Hi Neil, Thank you for your reply! We have posted the updated files below that contain your most recent changes.
Please review the document carefully to ensure satisfaction as we do not make changes once it has been published as an RFC. Contact us with any further updates or with your approval of the document in its current form. We will await your approval prior to moving forward in the publication process. The files have been posted here (please refresh): https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9610.txt https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9610.pdf https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9610.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9610.xml The relevant diff files have been posted here (please refresh): https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9610-diff.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9610-rfcdiff.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9610-auth48diff.html For the AUTH48 status of this document, please see: https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9610 Thank you, RFC Editor/mc > On Dec 11, 2024, at 8:52 PM, Neil Jenkins <ne...@fastmailteam.com> wrote: > > Hi Madison, > > On further review I found one error plus a few small indentation > inconsistencies in the examples. I have corrected these; please see attached > XML. > > Kind regards, > Neil. > <rfc9610.xml> -- auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org
