Hi Neil, Thank you for your reply! We have updated the document to reflect your updates. We have no further followup questions at this time.
Please review the document carefully to ensure satisfaction as we do not make changes once it has been published as an RFC. Contact us with any further updates or with your approval of the document in its current form. We will await approvals from each author prior to moving forward in the publication process. The files have been posted here (please refresh): https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9610.txt https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9610.pdf https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9610.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9610.xml The relevant diff files have been posted here (please refresh): https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9610-diff.html (comprehensive diff) https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9610-rfcdiff.html (side-by-side diff) https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9610-auth48diff.html (changes made in AUTH48) For the AUTH48 status of this document, please see: https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9610 Thank you, RFC Editor/mc > On Dec 2, 2024, at 7:54 PM, Neil Jenkins > <neilj=40fastmailteam....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > > Hi > > Please find attached a revised XML file. I have addressed all the editor's > questions and updated some formatting to match what we are doing in the other > JMAP docs (e.g. RFC9670). I think this is now looking good for publication, > but please let me know if there are any further queries. > > Cheers, > Neil. > <rfc9610.xml> -- auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org
