Hi Neil, Thank you for your reply! We will keep the text as is.
Since we have received your approval, we consider AUTH48 complete (see https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9610). Thank you for your attention and guidance during the AUTH48 process! We will prepare the document for publication at this time. Best regards, RFC Editor/mc > On Dec 15, 2024, at 10:24 PM, Neil Jenkins <ne...@fastmailteam.com> wrote: > > p.MsoNormal,p.MsoNoSpacing{margin:0} > On Sat, 14 Dec 2024, at 14:50, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: >> Just on the question of use of "whitespace": >> I concur that it's a term of art, and that even if we were to try to >> neutralize it by referencing ABNF, ABNF also calls it whitespace (i.e., >> "WSP" and its derivatives). >> >> On the other hand, I believe there's no loss of precision or generality by >> simply calling it "space" either. > > Personally, I think this is less clear as "space" is liable to be interpreted > as just the Space character (U+0020), rather than any whitespace character. > So I would prefer to keep the current text. > > Cheers, > Neil. -- auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org
