Michael,

Thank you for sending along these files and the guidance!  We have sent replies 
to the individual document threads and copied them below for everyone’s 
convenience.

We believe all of our queries have been addressed for the documents in this 
cluster at this time. 

The AUTH48 status page for the entire cluster is viewable here: 
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/C508 

Please see further instruction and comments in the per-document messages 
(copied below).

Thank you.

RFC Editor/mf


—---
Michael,

Thank you for sending along the files updated with the capitalization guidance 
in response to our cluster-wide query.  We have adopted these files and posted 
them below.

We had one follow up when reviewing this file: 

-with the updates to capitalization, Section 1.4 (Glossary of Key Terms) now 
contains the following text:

   Local Endpoint:  The Local Endpoint.

Please consider if this redundant text appears as desired or if it should be 
updated or deleted from the list (we see Remote Endpoint contains a fair amount 
of description in comparison).

Please review the files carefully as we do not make changes after publication.  

The files have been posted here (please refresh):
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9621.txt
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9621.pdf
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9621.html
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9621.xml
 
The relevant diff files have been posted here (please refresh):
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9621-diff.html (comprehensive diff)
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9621-auth48diff.html (AUTH48 changes 
only)
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9621-lastdiff.html (last to current 
version only)
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9621-lastrfcdiff.html (ditto but 
rfcdiff)

Please contact us with any further updates/questions/comments you may have.  

We will await approvals from each of the parties listed on the AUTH48 status 
page prior to moving forward to publication.  

The AUTH48 status page for this document is available here:

https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9621

Thank you.

RFC Editor/mf

—---

Michael,

Thank you for sending along the files updated with the capitalization guidance 
in response to our cluster-wide query.  We have adopted these files and posted 
them below.

Note: We have made a single update to include a comma in the second sentence of 
the second paragraph in Section 9.1.3.5.

Please review the files carefully as we do not make changes after publication.  

The files have been posted here (please refresh):
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9622.txt
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9622.pdf
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9622.html
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9622.xml
 
The relevant diff files have been posted here (please refresh):
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9622-diff.html (comprehensive diff)
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9622-auth48diff.html (AUTH48 changes 
only)
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9622-lastdiff.html (last to current 
version only)
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9622-lastrfcdiff.html (ditto but 
rfcdiff)

Please contact us with any further updates/questions/comments you may have.  

We will await approvals from each of the parties listed on the AUTH48 status 
page prior to moving forward to publication.  

The AUTH48 status page for this document is available here:

https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9622

Thank you.

RFC Editor/mf
—----

Michael,

Thank you for sending along the files updated with the capitalization guidance 
in response to our cluster-wide query.  We have adopted these files and posted 
them below.  Note that we have made no changes to the file submitted by Michael.

Please review the files carefully as we do not make changes after publication.  

The files have been posted here (please refresh):
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9623.txt
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9623.pdf
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9623.html
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9623.xml
 
The relevant diff files have been posted here (please refresh):
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9623-diff.html (comprehensive diff)
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9623-auth48diff.html (AUTH48 changes 
only)
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9623-lastdiff.html (last to current 
version only)
   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9623-lastrfcdiff.html (ditto but 
rfcdiff)

Please contact us with any further updates/questions/comments you may have.  

We will await approvals from each of the parties listed on the AUTH48 status 
page prior to moving forward to publication.  

The AUTH48 status page for this document is available here:

https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9623

Thank you.

RFC Editor/mf





> On Dec 17, 2024, at 11:34 AM, Michael Welzl <mich...@ifi.uio.no> wrote:
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> I am now finished with the capitalization task for the entire cluster. I’m 
> attaching “before” and “after” versions of the XML files (filenames 
> “-OLD.xml” and “-NEW.xml”).
> I would like to say that I approve publication (as Megan wrote, please see 
> here:  https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/C508  - everyone needs to approve 
> everything so this can go ahead!), but this update was so big and I think 
> it’s important to get this right due to our special use of capitals to 
> indicate the abstract element offered to the application, versus small 
> letters to indicate elements related to the transport protocols below.
> 
> So, I would like to give it 1-2 days, in the hope that some of my co-authors 
> here take a look at the diffs and either make corrections or say that they 
> approve. Let’s get a few approvals from you others, and then let’s quickly 
> all approve, please. I believe that this is the very last thing we have to do 
> here!
> 
> 
> TO MY CLUSTER CO-AUTHORS:
> 
> The best way to look at these files is to upload them here:
> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff
> 
> Also, I think it’s fair to say that, at this point, *each and every one of 
> you* owes me a beer   :-)))
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> Michael
> 
> <rfc9621-NEW.xml>
> <rfc9621-OLD.xml>
> <rfc9622-NEW.xml>
> <rfc9622-OLD.xml>
> <rfc9623-NEW.xml>
> <rfc9623-OLD.xml>

-- 
auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org

Reply via email to