Dear all,

I am now working on cluster-wide question 5:

> 5) We have already sent some document-specific queries related to the use of 
> <tt>.  For your convenience, we have also created a cluster-wide list that is 
> sorted alphanumerically and marked by RFC number: 
> 
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/clusterC508tt.txt
> 
> Please verify that the use of <tt> appears as desired both within the 
> documents and across the cluster.  Again, any desired updates are best 
> communicated through updates to the XML file itself.
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> RFC Editor/mf

… and I don’t think that this question will need discussion among the authors. 
I’m working only on RFC 9622 for now, which, I believe, is otherwise final ?? - 
and I’m done with RFC 9621, which is attached. The changes to RFC 9621 are 
extremely minor.

I will delay working on RFC 9623 until I hear that the last requests from Reese 
have been incorporated to avoid versioning problems between your and my XML 
files.

Cheers,
Michael


Attachment: rfc9621.xml
Description: XML document

-- 
auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org

Reply via email to