> > > > No I actually think this should reflect the affiliation at the time of the > workshop, >
I think this is a problem much bigger than workshops. RFCs come into the same question at times when a draft gets to AUTH48 sometimes authors change their affiliation at the last second. As everyone knows, the IETF is an odd place where "we work as individuals but yet somehow the company name still really really matters". I cloud see CDT being annoyed at losing publicity (as would potentially cisco, or USC, or Mozilla, or ...). or we could just remove affiliation in that section completely for all. In > other reports I found both cases, with or without affiliation. Maybe we > could also established a common practice for future reports…? > It does seem the last few we've published removes affiliation, which makes sense. Though it does remove transparency to easily detect if one company flooded the workshop or something. -- Wes Hardaker USC/ISI
-- auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org
