Re: [WL] Re: [SAtalk] OT: forged habeus mark

2004-01-13 Thread Vivek Khera
n't seen more than one or two of these spams on my SA-protected mailboxes, and my email address is on *every* "millions of addresses" CD out there. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D.Khera Communications,

Re: [SAtalk] SA for IM?

2003-12-12 Thread Vivek Khera
er. i occasionally get some troller randomly chatting with me pretending to be the "person I met last friday at the party" but they are easily ignored. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D.Khera Communication

Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin 2.61 released!

2003-12-12 Thread Vivek Khera
elf: http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2569 Thanks. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D.Khera Communications, Inc. Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rockville, MD +1-240-453-8497 AIM: vivekkhera Y!: vivek_kh

Re: [SAtalk] amavisd-new & spamassassin = no headers. Ugh!

2003-12-08 Thread Vivek Khera
ly the ones that affect the module will be effective in amavisd-new. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D.Khera Communications, Inc. Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rockville, MD +1-240-453

Re: [SAtalk] BIG HUGE EVIL RULE NEWS!!!!

2003-12-03 Thread Vivek Khera
"cn-inflatables.com" ;-) -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D.Khera Communications, Inc. Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rockville, MD +1-240-453-8497 AIM: vivekkhera Y!: vivek_khera

Re: [SAtalk] Mailinglist-letter marked as spam every time

2003-11-20 Thread Vivek Khera
ollowups of other cases where it fails miserably. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D.Khera Communications, Inc. Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rockville, MD +1-240-453-8497 AIM: vivekkhera Y!: vivek_khera http://www.khera.org/~vivek/ ---

Re: [SAtalk] A black listing question

2003-11-11 Thread Vivek Khera
ith the reverse to avoid forgeries of DNS. my bet is that you will find very few, if any, of those spam messages originated at outlazed.com. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D.Khera Communications, Inc. Internet: [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: SpamCop pre-emptive listings (RE: [SAtalk] Offsetting rules?)

2003-11-07 Thread Vivek Khera
s, or even months later will drastically skew the results when comparing the lists, since they are dynamic. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D.Khera Communications, Inc. Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rockville, MD +1-240-453-8497 AIM: vivekkhera Y!:

Re: [SAtalk] (not) up to date SpamAssassin

2003-11-05 Thread Vivek Khera
ations in future I think... Yep. Just stick with the underscores. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D.Khera Communications, Inc. Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rockville, MD +1-240-453-

Re: [SAtalk] Re: [RD] Open source is Naughty!!!

2003-10-30 Thread Vivek Khera
counting the imaginary characters off the beginning and end of the string as matching a "\W". [ ... ] -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D.Khera Communications, Inc. Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [SAtalk] Re: Re: [OT] What is next step?

2003-10-27 Thread Vivek Khera
ster@ addresses would hope that more would skip them. :-( -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D.Khera Communications, Inc. Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rockville, MD +1-240-453-8497 AIM: vive

Re: [SAtalk] I wish I wasn't discarding high scorers

2003-10-27 Thread Vivek Khera
rded after KG> scoring 127.509. I'm impressed and would like to see how he did that :) Do you have your amavisd-new keep a spam quarantine directory? It does that by default, so look for something like /var/virusmails and see if it is there. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [SAtalk] IP Blocks to kill at the firewall?

2003-10-25 Thread Vivek Khera
ng of mailing list mail. For me, this reduces scanning load by nearly 50%, since most of my mail is list mail. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D.Khera Communications, Inc. Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rockville,

Re: [SAtalk] Problems installing SpamAssassin 2.6

2003-10-24 Thread Vivek Khera
> e. -T is good, and you shouldn't modify @INC. try setting PERL5LIB. The -T switch will cause perl to ignore that environment variable... -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D.Khera Communications, Inc. Internet:

[SAtalk] integration for SortMonster MessageSniffer

2003-10-17 Thread Vivek Khera
For anyone interested, I've just posted some patches against SA 2.60 to add support for SortMonster's MessageSniffer product (another spam detecting tool). By combining these tools, all of those "4.9 point" FN's get whacked pretty effectively. I'm debating adding a rule to subtract 3.0 points if

Re: [SAtalk] Is there a way to reject a message before it arrives?

2003-10-09 Thread Vivek Khera
. What I do is use some strict SMTP-time checks on commonly forged domains (aol.com, hotmail.com, etc.) and a handful of low-collateral damage DNSBLs to reduce the amount of crap that gets in to the filtering step. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khe

Re: [SAtalk] tag vs deleted spam w/ SA

2003-10-09 Thread Vivek Khera
amavisd-new source code is your friend, as are the lookup readme files. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D.Khera Communications, Inc. Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rockville, MD +1-240-

Re: [SAtalk] RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK problem

2003-09-25 Thread Vivek Khera
a text file. Now run that thru spamassassin -t. Now, remove one "Received" header at a time from the top and run it thru again. Repeat until it flags your message with dynablock. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D.

Re: [SAtalk] monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death (fwd)

2003-09-24 Thread Vivek Khera
o take more than a DDoS to take out monkeys.com BA> permanently. He has posted a statement to spamtools to the contrary, that for at least 6 months he will respond negatively to every query, and after 6 months he will give ample warning of when the zones may go away. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [SAtalk] 2.6.0 on CPAN -- when will it get there?

2003-09-24 Thread Vivek Khera
he module and any listed dependencies. If you already have SA installed, there are no new dependencies you need. So fetch, extract, make and install manually is identical to CPAN. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D.Khera

Re: [SAtalk] spamassassin v 2.53 + amavisd-new

2003-09-23 Thread Vivek Khera
> "MA" == Mrvka Andreas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: MA> so i see that spamassassin is working, BUT where do i configure MA> spamassassin? MA> (company-wide) You can do it in the site-wide spam assassin local.cf file, or since amavisd runs as a particular user, do it in that user's personal co

Re: [SAtalk] Razor 2.22- 2.36 Taint issue patch

2003-09-16 Thread Vivek Khera
user razor anymore since it has been pretty ineffective for me. Thus I don't have a suitable patch for taint-safeness for anything newer. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D.Khera Communications, Inc. Internet: [EMAIL PR

Re: [SAtalk] no spam today uses SA?

2003-09-16 Thread Vivek Khera
es. Maybe because NA bought Deersoft? -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D.Khera Communications, Inc. Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rockville, MD +1-240-453-8497 AIM: vivekkhera Y!: vivek_khera http://www.khera.org/~vivek/ -

Re: [SAtalk] no spam today uses SA?

2003-09-16 Thread Vivek Khera
retty obvious a lot of people assume things about the SA licence but haven't actually read it or tried to understand it... Same goes for a lot of Open Source projects, it seems. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D.Khera Comm

Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin 2.60 rc4 released

2003-09-12 Thread Vivek Khera
} } elsif ($rr->type eq "CNAME") { if ($rr->cname eq 'list.terminator') { pop @list if $pushed; -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D.Khera Com

Re: [SAtalk] Is no message-id header a good measure of spam?

2003-09-10 Thread Vivek Khera
ee one off-hand, but there might be. You'll notice when you submit messages to SpamCop, it often detects that the msg-id was inserted by an intermediate mail relay. Perhaps that is a good test since many mail servers do this for you as a favor (eg, Postfix). -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [SAtalk] spam assassin helps make spam

2003-08-27 Thread Vivek Khera
to other software (whether to refile, redirect, drop, or 'bounce'). -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D.Khera Communications, Inc. Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rockville, MD +1-

Re: [SAtalk] FreeBSD Upgrade to 4.8

2003-08-27 Thread Vivek Khera
nice updates you install. What you probably want to do is re-run cpan and ask it what modules are out of date (the 'r' command) and update them with 'install'. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D.Khera C

Re: [SAtalk] DCC stopping this list?

2003-08-10 Thread Vivek Khera
ed to whitelist your _receiving_ code so that it does not block your requested list/bulk mail based on the DCC check, since by definition those messages should be in DCC. You should not bypass _reporting_ any message you receive. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Re: [SAtalk] My rules don't work.

2003-08-07 Thread Vivek Khera
d results. Globals? Who uses globals? Everything should be encapsulated in an object anyway, or can be made into lexically scoped "my" variables. This solves the "problem" handily. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D.

Re: [SAtalk] My rules don't work.

2003-08-06 Thread Vivek Khera
er a while of no activity. Personally, I don't need it now since I run under amavisd-new, but perhaps in another life I may... -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D.Khera Communications, Inc. Internet: [EM

Re: [SAtalk] Blocking during MTA

2003-07-18 Thread Vivek Khera
leases can do this using amavisd-new (or anything that speaks SMTP and can run SA for you). -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D.Khera Communications, Inc. Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rockville, MD +1-240-453-849

Re: [SAtalk] Re: Re[2]: Re: Movie FILTER THIS VIRUS ALREADY!!!

2003-07-18 Thread Vivek Khera
prints this: started 1058557662.08352 ended 1058557662.08387 elapsed 0.000345945358276367 The regexp engine in perl is quite smart, and if you give it hints, it gets even better... -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D.

Re: [SAtalk] Vexira antivirus

2003-07-17 Thread Vivek Khera
s. we use the command line vexira product in conjunction with amavisd-new to manage calling it and SA. If you bought the vexira mail server version, you have to daisy chain it with amavisd-new, which is a lot of duplicated effort. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Re: [SAtalk] Re: Re[2]: Re: Movie FILTER THIS VIRUS ALREADY!!!

2003-07-17 Thread Vivek Khera
is now closed to non-member posts, as I have just had to resubscribe myself with nomail in order to post (I read from a local list exploder). -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D.Khera Communications, Inc. Internet: [EM

Re: [SAtalk] Two new techniques or old hat?

2003-07-07 Thread Vivek Khera
OK if the MX records exist. The standards define that if they exist, they must be honored. If they don't exist, then one must use the A record, as was the way before MX records were invented. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D.

Re: [SAtalk] Hormel sues

2003-07-02 Thread Vivek Khera
ademark as an ISP and MSS> software vendor. Think "Coke" and "Pepsi" and see how far you get trademarking that in a computer context... Not that SPAM is at that same level of brand awareness... -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vive

Re: [SAtalk] Re: misc virus warnings...

2003-06-30 Thread Vivek Khera
own" to be a forger, even though it was considered "new" too. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D.Khera Communications, Inc. Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rockville, MD +1

Re: [SAtalk] Re: misc virus warnings...

2003-06-27 Thread Vivek Khera
t forges the return address. Like I've always said, it is a lot easier to write crappy programs than it is to write good programs... -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D.Khera Communications, Inc. Internet: [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: [SAtalk] Re: spammers aren't the only ones who can teach. (wasWe TEACH you how

2003-06-25 Thread Vivek Khera
y-abusing software will even report 5xx errors back, as that would waste time. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D.Khera Communications, Inc. Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rockville, MD +1-24

Re: [SAtalk] DNSBL MTA rejection and more efficiency?

2003-06-19 Thread Vivek Khera
, naturally, are tagged by SA quite effectively (about 30% of what makes it past those blocks). -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D.Khera Communications, Inc. Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rockville, MD +1-240-

RE: [SAtalk] spammers aren't the only ones who can teach. (was We TEACH you how to ...)

2003-06-17 Thread Vivek Khera
> "BJ" == Ben Johansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: BJ> LOL! BJ> Teaching implies that the student will learn and put the learning into BJ> practice. BJ> How can there be learnin' if their dead behind the shed? ;-) You assume the student is the one behind the shed.

Re: [SAtalk] SA used as a gateway

2003-06-17 Thread Vivek Khera
k advice from your mail server vendor/mailing list on how to teach it to forward mail appropriately. Personally, I use postfix+amavisd-new for this purpose, and postfix' transport tables to do the routing to the final destination. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Re: [SAtalk] OT: SCO may have violated GNU

2003-06-12 Thread Vivek Khera
s. He cannot retroactively change the license terms of existing licencees. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D.Khera Communications, Inc. Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rockville, MD +1-240-453-8497 AIM: vivekkhera Y!: vivek_khera http://www.khera.org/~vivek/ -

Re: [SAtalk] Spamtrap account?

2003-06-06 Thread Vivek Khera
> "JF" == Jim Ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: JF> they spam me, procmail will report them to Razor. But the obvious JF> thing for a spammer to do would be to delete any addresses in his JF> DB that contain the string 'spam' - I would think that they would You'd think it was obvious to them t

Re: [SAtalk] A newbie question about spam rules

2003-06-06 Thread Vivek Khera
> "PM" == Patrick Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: PM> Your mail server is listed by Osirusoft as an open relay. You may want PM> to take it up with them. ROTFL. Lots of luck. Osirusoft is probably one of the most poorly managed lists. Total black hole when you try to contact them, and

Re: [SAtalk] OT: Randomly picking X addresses from a file

2003-06-03 Thread Vivek Khera
> "JS" == Justin Shore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: JS> What I don't know how to do is randomly pick a line from a file. Like I JS> said I'm doing this from the CLI where it only takes a nominal amount of JS> shell scripting to have a working product in the end. Any tips would be /usr/games/

Re: [SAtalk] Advice Please

2003-05-31 Thread Vivek Khera
> "L" == Larry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: L> The default formatting for Lotus iNotes messages is RichText (base64 L> encoding). >> How does rich text imply base64 encoding? Apple Mail can do rich >> text, but it is sent clear. L> You will need to ask IBM/Lotus why they do not do it the way

Re: [SAtalk] Attaboy

2003-05-31 Thread Vivek Khera
> "SP" == Steve Prior <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: SP> I'd start to question what that employee is doing that is getting him SP> on that many spammer lists - does this employee actually do stuff or just SP> register his email address with pr0n sites all day... I've had the same email address s

Re: [SAtalk] Advice Please

2003-05-31 Thread Vivek Khera
an do rich text, but it is sent clear. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D.Khera Communications, Inc. Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rockville, MD +1-240-453-8497 AIM: vivekkhera Y!: vivek_khera http://www.khera.org/~vivek/ --- Th

Re: [SAtalk] Advice Please

2003-05-30 Thread Vivek Khera
> "AL" == Alan Leghart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: AL> to use different encoding (although, IIRC, it's not base-64 by AL> default). I tested on one machine on our LAN, and from inside AL> Excel 2000, select File and Send as email. Voici, base-64 encoded AL> when it goes out. I'm glad I didn

Re: [SAtalk] Worried about RBLs

2003-05-30 Thread Vivek Khera
ually mean. Like you, I only use the automated technical-criteria BLs plus the SBL list. Actually, currently I only use list.dsbl.org and sbl.spamhaus.org since adding more lists only results in a bunch of more DNS lookups for very little gain. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

RE: [SAtalk] Spam nstallingassasin

2003-05-30 Thread Vivek Khera
> "SL" == Shayne Lebrun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: SL> nslookup relays.monkeys.com SL> Server: black.MUSKOKA.COM SL> Address: 216.123.107.2 SL> Name:relays.monkeys.com SL> Relays.monkeys.com doesn't currently have an IP addy assigned to it, looks SL> like. Which has nothing to do wit

Re: [SAtalk] sa 2.51 and line termination

2003-03-25 Thread Vivek Khera
> "SR" == Sönke Ruempler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> SA is not writing directly to your mail storage. It is handing it off >> to procmail or back to your MTA for final delivery. It is the SR> but if the MTA requires CRLF, it would be great to have an option for that Or better yet, get y

Re: [SAtalk] sa 2.51 and line termination

2003-03-25 Thread Vivek Khera
> "SR" == Sönke Ruempler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> It is only a *must* when MTA speaks with MTA. SA is not an MTA, so it >> can use native line encoding to speak with the local MTA. >> >> POP3 is not an MTA either... the RFC you cite has nothing to day about >> how the local mail system

Re: [SAtalk] Double opt-in versus confirmed opt-in?

2003-03-13 Thread Vivek Khera
> "TVD" == Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: TVD> and a few other URLs that specify no difference/define the term: TVD> http://www.smallbizmailer.com/features/opt_in.ttml Wow... that's run by me (it is actually a copy of our main site, www.mailermailer.com). I think that page is p

Re: [SAtalk] Does anyone know how to setup Spam Assassin to automatically count all messages over a certain size as spam so they can be bounced back?

2003-02-04 Thread Vivek Khera
> "KAJ" == Kelly Annette Jameson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: KAJ> Does anyone know how to setup Spam Assassin to automatically count all KAJ> messages over a certain size as spam so they can be bounced back? why not just make your server refuse messages over a certain size?

Re: [SAtalk] oddness with FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD

2003-01-16 Thread Vivek Khera
> "JM" == John Madden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> else, do it. But don't fake the SMTP sender. JM> Right - the SMTP sender wasn't faked. It was "blackboard JM> (blackboard.ivy.tec.in.us...)" -- no mention of hotmail.com. You're confusing the SMTP sender with the SMTP client. -

Re: [SAtalk] oddness with FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD

2003-01-16 Thread Vivek Khera
e test is misnamed perhaps, but the test itself is correct. If you want to set the From address to something else, do it. But don't fake the SMTP sender. Either that, or bypass the spam tests for locally originating mail and let it all go out. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Re: [SAtalk] Guidelines for Mass Mailings

2003-01-10 Thread Vivek Khera
> "TLS" == Tony L Svanstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: VK> Never underestimate the need for confirmation records... TLS> Never understimate the stupidity of some people... TLS> Never underestimate the usefulness of adding a "this was sent to TLS> [EMAIL PROTECTED]" at the top of mailings;

Re: [SAtalk] Guidelines for Mass Mailings

2003-01-09 Thread Vivek Khera
t was destined to the original person whose address he redirected. Never underestimate the need for confirmation records... -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D.Khera Communications, Inc. Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [SAtalk] Deersoft acquisition (thumbs down)

2003-01-07 Thread Vivek Khera
ach source, that's impossible. This is precisely why the FSF requires copyright assignment for any alterations to projects they 'own' such as emacs and gcc -- there is one and only one copyright holder who can make all the necessary decisions for upholding the license. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [SAtalk] Guidelines for Mass Mailings

2003-01-07 Thread Vivek Khera
> "SE" == Steve Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: SE> I have a few users who want to know how to send mass mailings and not SE> get in trouble for sending spam. Does anyone know of a website with You can't. Period. You will *always* get complaints about your mail no matter what you do. No

Re: [SAtalk] Goodbye

2003-01-07 Thread Vivek Khera
, how does it change their ability to use the open source code? -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D.Khera Communications, Inc. Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rockville, MD +1-240-453-8497 AIM: vivekk

[SAtalk] spamassassin v. snortmonster's sniffer

2002-12-31 Thread Vivek Khera
perhaps sniffer could be a scored test within SA... How have other people's experiences been? -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D.Khera Communications, Inc. Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rockville, MD

Re: [SAtalk] X-Rot version

2002-12-25 Thread Vivek Khera
just end up with TLS> yet another e-mail you have to check to see if it is a fp. Personally, I think that any rule that triggers only in the spam corpus, and never in the non-spam, it should have a minimum score of 1 or 2 (or even higher). -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Re: [SAtalk] Re: [AMaViS-user] SA 2.50 and AWL

2002-12-23 Thread Vivek Khera
What would go a long way to help is per-recipient manual white lists in amavisd-new, rather than the current site-wide single white list. Ditto for black lists, but that's not as important. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D.

Re: [SAtalk] 2.50 question

2002-12-20 Thread Vivek Khera
ep of the way there, and if you don't exec anything, it does nothing to help you. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D.Khera Communications, Inc. Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rockville, MD +1-240-453-8

Re: [SAtalk] 2.50 question

2002-12-20 Thread Vivek Khera
.. Razor2 seems to override timeouts set by SA (supposedly worked-around in the next SA). Razor2 is not taint-mode safe (without the two Razor patches posted on the amavisd-new site). I find that amavisd-new is the best way to do spam/virus filtering at a site-wide level. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [SAtalk] Reporting to Razor

2002-12-18 Thread Vivek Khera
is a *VERY BAD IDEA*. You *will* end up reporting some mailing list mail to razor when it triggers enough rules. Did you ever wonder why things like the SourceForge monthly list membership reminder are in Razor? -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera,

Re: [SAtalk] Doh: false positive *SPAM* Majordomo results (fwd)

2002-12-13 Thread Vivek Khera
> "MK" == Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: MK> Razor is notorious for having some quantity of invalid submissions.. Not MK> too many, but some... (note: I'm excluding the null-mime-block issue from MK> this, since that's now fixed). Usually bad submitters get bad CF ratings, MK> but

Re: [SAtalk] Re: OT: No tag? (was: sql support)

2002-12-13 Thread Vivek Khera
CC'd most of the time. When I hit "reply" to this last message, it wanted to send To you, and Cc the list. Obviously, something gets lost by the time the message got to me... I'm using VM in XEmacs, which is a pretty decent program that tends to DTRT. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [SAtalk] Anti-spam-assassination?

2002-12-13 Thread Vivek Khera
> "BA" == Bob Apthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: BA> mailing lists, so it's in your organization's best interest to move to BA> 'confirmed opt-in' (or in greasy DMA-speak, 'double opt-in') as soon as BA> reasonably achievable. There's nothing greasy DMA-speak about "double opt-in". Describ

Re: [SAtalk] Anti-spam-assassination?

2002-12-13 Thread Vivek Khera
> "TVD" == Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: TVD> Another thing to make that subset smaller is double opt-in (ie: verify the TVD> initial opt-in). We're actually not doing that yet, although I hear it's TVD> on the board for next year. (so someone could, sign up for an account TVD>

Re: [SAtalk] Anti-spam-assassination?

2002-12-12 Thread Vivek Khera
me (possibly significant) subset of the world will consider you to be a spammer no matter what you do, unless you're 100% *confirmed* opt-in with all records to prove it. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D.

Re: [SAtalk] A Taste of their own....

2002-12-10 Thread Vivek Khera
> "DF" == Duncan Findlay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: DF> On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 10:12:26AM -0500, Mike Burger wrote: >> While I agree with what they're doing, I disagree with how they're doing >> it. For all intents and purposes, the "anti-spammers" in question are >> still costing someone

Re: [SAtalk] GENUINE_EBAY_RCVD

2002-12-10 Thread Vivek Khera
ng the transport. There's nothing fishy about it. As to determining if it is really ebay, well, that's a really good question. I guess if the last received header prior to your mail server's header is ebay, it would be a good hint. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [SAtalk] Integration with an MTA (sendmail)

2002-12-10 Thread Vivek Khera
e/amavisd/ I use it with postfix as a content filter. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D.Khera Communications, Inc. Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rockville, MD +1-240-453-8497 AIM: viv

Re: [SAtalk] Minor problem re rfc822 & SA

2002-12-09 Thread Vivek Khera
uot; KWG> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is. It seems that is where Webshield is I believe that would be an incorrect interpretation. The only time you need double quotes on the name part of an address is when it contains things like commas or other quotes. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

RE: [SAtalk] 2.43 - too many false negatives

2002-12-06 Thread Vivek Khera
> "MM" == Michael Moncur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: MM> These folks are serious spammers. They even register each of the domain MM> names to look legit. Look up findhsm-list-cluster-182-643.com or any of the MM> others, they're all registered to Daily Promotions. (It's a shame a WHOIS MM> loo

Re: [SAtalk] Bayesian hybrid

2002-12-03 Thread Vivek Khera
ter or worse than SA does now. I've not tried this out because I havn't the time, but I should within a couple of months or so. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D.Khera Communications, Inc. Internet: [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: [SAtalk] what's wrong with my SA's math?

2002-11-27 Thread Vivek Khera
> "TK" == Tilman Kastner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: TK> Obviously, the negative score did not apply to the TK> sum. (It's a custom rule to avoid false positives). Where did you learn arithmetic? ;-) It adds up fine in my calculation. What score did you expect to get from adding up all thos

Re: [SAtalk] bouncing as an alternative to /dev/null

2002-11-25 Thread Vivek Khera
Postfix ? RH> amavisd-new does that. No, it does not reject at the SMTP level. It accepts the message, scans it, then generates bounces as necessary. The postfix content filter just can't do the reject at SMTP connect time. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [SAtalk] bouncing as an alternative to /dev/null

2002-11-25 Thread Vivek Khera
m is BAD. Look it up on Google. I don't think it is much worse than refusing to accept it in the first place. Auto-dropping spam is, bad, though, since the real FP's won't ever know what happened. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek

Re: [SAtalk] Web Interface for Spamassassin

2002-11-25 Thread Vivek Khera
ring tool, and does not run SA in a way that it knows who the local user (if there is one) is. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D.Khera Communications, Inc. Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rockville, MD +1-240-45

Re: [SAtalk] False Negative Corpus

2002-11-22 Thread Vivek Khera
f use to the SA guys. I think it is about as useful as reporting virii missed by several months old antivirus software... SA has advanced significantly since 2.31, and spam has evolved since then too. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D.

Re: [SAtalk] Bayesian attack

2002-11-19 Thread Vivek Khera
> "RV" == Ross Vandegrift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: RV> On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 05:14:46PM +, Justin Mason wrote: >> I notice the bayes-busting spam posted on spambayes used linuxy text. >> That probably works quite well given the current bayes userset ;) RV> Ah, that's friggin geni

Re: [SAtalk] Re: Spammer forums?

2002-11-18 Thread Vivek Khera
> "DM" == David Masterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: DM> H. If it was truly "opt-in", why would they need to avoid DM> filters? They could simply have their customers white-list them. Not everyone has control over their filters. Think AOL. Think Yahoo! They apparently do some sort o

Re: [SAtalk] Razor being attacked?

2002-11-15 Thread Vivek Khera
> "DS" == Dave Slusher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: DS> Software and Winamp announce newsletters. I've been revoking them as DS> they come through, but it is becoming an increasing pain. I guess the DS> question is if this is deliberate or someone erroneously set on DS> automatic report? I've

Re: [SAtalk] Razor being attacked?

2002-11-15 Thread Vivek Khera
> "DS" == Dave Slusher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: DS> Software and Winamp announce newsletters. I've been revoking them as DS> they come through, but it is becoming an increasing pain. I guess the DS> question is if this is deliberate or someone erroneously set on DS> automatic report? I've

Re: [SAtalk] Postfix. How do I do quick set-up for SA? (NEWBIE)

2002-11-11 Thread Vivek Khera
amavisd/ Full instructions are provided within. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D.Khera Communications, Inc. Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rockville, MD +1-240-453-8497 AIM: vivekkhera Y!: vivek_kher

RE: [SAtalk] Why was -S option depreciated?

2002-11-07 Thread Vivek Khera
> "DWM" == Darren W McClung writes: DWM> I wish. In the last week, out of 4,816 messages, 2,744 (56%) DWM> were spam, and I've blocked a good number of the problem DWM> mailservers (*.colonize.com) at the firewall. I have found that using a relays and proxy server block list at the SMTP lev

Re: [SAtalk] Well written spam advertising how to spam

2002-11-05 Thread Vivek Khera
> "JS" == Jan Schreckenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: JS> Hi, JS> why is this list not filtered on the list server? It's open to JS> post for everyone. Should not every list like that be filtered? How exactly do you propose discussing spam and spam techniques without examples? Lists that *

Re: [SAtalk] how to bounce mail above a threshhold?

2002-10-29 Thread Vivek Khera
> "RG" == Roland Gaspar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: RG> oooh.. that would open-up a whole can of email DDOS RG> whup-ass... just imagine I don't like someone, so I send spam, as RG> them, to hundreds of sites, imagine now that it's a perfect world RG> and 100% of those use SA and have it confi

Re: [SAtalk] Perspectives on (not) using SA

2002-10-29 Thread Vivek Khera
> "JM" == Justin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: JM> Ralf Hildebrandt said: >> He's wrong on this: >> Fourth, and I've saved the best for last: SA is a HOG. I refuse to >> fire up perl for each message, and I refuse to full-body-grep each >> message that comes in. >> (spamc/spamd and also

Re: [SAtalk] SA/Razor effectiveness

2002-10-29 Thread Vivek Khera
it was the Dilbert newsletter) that was listed in Razor2. Luckily, it did not go over my threshhold ;-) I'm gonna upgrade the inbound filtering box soon, as Razor2 seems to be doing pretty well. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D.

Re: [SAtalk] Nigerian spam scores 3.1 in SA 2.43?

2002-10-18 Thread Vivek Khera
> "TVD" == Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: TVD> Overall, I don't get very many of these -- do other people see more? TVD> I get maybe 1 or 2 a month if that (out of ~1700 spams/month). I get tons. At least 5 to 10 a week. But then, I've actually received two of these via postal

Re: [SAtalk] Pyzor, DCC or Razor2?

2002-10-17 Thread Vivek Khera
> "IA" == Ives Aerts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: IA> After upgrading to 2.42, I get a lot less (actually none so far) false IA> positives but I do get more false negatives. To do something about IA> that, I thought of adding pyzor, dcc or razor2 to my installation. Any IA> suggestions as to wh

Re: [SAtalk] spamassassin 2.41 "tests=none"

2002-10-17 Thread Vivek Khera
t of date modules, and update them (except where they insist on installing a newer perl). -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D.Khera Communications, Inc. Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rockville, MD +1-240-453-849

Re: [SAtalk] SA performance information

2002-10-15 Thread Vivek Khera
0ms to 300ms per message to process thru SA. The combo of amavisd-new and postfix is great in that you can limit the resources you allocate to filtering. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D.Khera Communications, Inc. Internet: [

  1   2   >