>>>>> "WT" == Warren Togami <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
WT> the past have been accused of. Would anyone else agree that the SBL is WT> generally safe to add to your MTA's rejection list? The DNSBLs I use at server rejection time are: list.dsbl.org sbl.spamhaus.org in that order. The list.dsbl.org is by far the most effective spam blocking tool I've encountered. It blocks nearly 2000 messages at the gate per day on my domain (which only has 3 or 4 real addresses in it.) The SBL list blocks an additional dozen or so per day. The rest, naturally, are tagged by SA quite effectively (about 30% of what makes it past those blocks). -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D. Khera Communications, Inc. Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rockville, MD +1-240-453-8497 AIM: vivekkhera Y!: vivek_khera http://www.khera.org/~vivek/ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
