>>>>> "TVD" == Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> What is the difference between spamc and spamassassin? Is this the only >> difference? Can I safely replace 'spamc' by 'spamassassin' in my >> .procmailrc? TVD> See "man spamd". But basically, spamc/spamd is much more efficient than TVD> "spamassassin" since spamd daemonizes, then spamc calls it to scan mails, TVD> instead of having spamassassin try to start up for each and every message. I was just thinking about PersistentPerl (see CPAN)... has anyone run spamassassin under it? It would seem to eliminate many of the issues with the startup delays for running SA if you get a burst of mail, and you'd get the benefit of your own private instance of an SA "daemon" which would automagically disappear after a while of no activity. Personally, I don't need it now since I run under amavisd-new, but perhaps in another life I may... -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D. Khera Communications, Inc. Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rockville, MD +1-240-453-8497 AIM: vivekkhera Y!: vivek_khera http://www.khera.org/~vivek/ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
