>>>>> "g" == gabriel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
g> Hi. I'm currently evaluating SpamAssassin for use in filtering / g> tagging spam, and I'm curious to know how well it performs. That is, on g> a given bit of hardware, let's say P-III @ 1GHz, 1GB Ram, about how many g> messages could spam assassin handle? Any pointers? Depends on how you incorporate it into your mail server. I use it with amavisd-new and postfix on a similar machine (only 768 MB RAM) with a wicked fast disk. If I turn of network checks, it takes about 50ms to 300ms per message to process thru SA. The combo of amavisd-new and postfix is great in that you can limit the resources you allocate to filtering. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D. Khera Communications, Inc. Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rockville, MD +1-240-453-8497 AIM: vivekkhera Y!: vivek_khera http://www.khera.org/~vivek/ ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
