>>>>> "AM" == Alan Munday <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
AM> If the mailer is a legitimate habeas user then surely they won't be sending AM> mail that would rate as spam anyway? AM> So if the habeas test scores 0 it should make no difference. AM> Just a thought. If all the world used SpamAssassin, that might make sense. However this is not the case. The variety of spam filtering systems out there make it so that if you adjust your ligitimate mail message so it doesn't trigger on SA, it might trigger on some other filter or vice versa. Having a "watermark" that gets you by these filters for ligitimate mail makes sense. Personally, I think the right thing to do is to add counter-rules for this specific spammer (the messages appear to be very easy to spot) rather than blank out the habeas rules. Funny thing is I haven't seen more than one or two of these spams on my SA-protected mailboxes, and my email address is on *every* "millions of addresses" CD out there. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D. Khera Communications, Inc. Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rockville, MD +1-301-869-4449 x806 AIM: vivekkhera Y!: vivek_khera http://www.khera.org/~vivek/ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms. Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
