>>>>> "IA" == Ives Aerts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
IA> After upgrading to 2.42, I get a lot less (actually none so far) false IA> positives but I do get more false negatives. To do something about IA> that, I thought of adding pyzor, dcc or razor2 to my installation. Any IA> suggestions as to which one to use? Stability and effectivity are my IA> main concerns. I'm using amavisd-new for scanning incoming mail, and razor is disabled there. I do notice that when I get a spam, almost always it is listed in Razor2 and that would have thrown it over the spam thresshold. I haven't tried pyzor or DCC. I'm a bit leery of DCC since it is designed to detect bulk, not necessarily SPAM. I don't consider volume to be necessarily an indicator of SPAM. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: viaVerio will pay you up to $1,000 for every account that you consolidate with us. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;4749864;7604308;v? http://www.viaverio.com/consolidator/osdn.cfm _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
