>>>>> "ML" == Mike Loiterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
ML> I followed the instuructions below to patch Razor2's taint problem. ML> The Config.pm patch worked perfectly, but the Core.pm patch failed at ML> hunk 1. Is this an SA issue, or a Razor issue..(i.e. patch created ML> by Razor folks or SA folks)? It is a Razor issue. I've submitted patches to them twice so far, but apparently they don't believe in security thru taint-mode in perl. Their choice. I posted my latest patches for razor 2.34 here a few days ago. I don't user razor anymore since it has been pretty ineffective for me. Thus I don't have a suitable patch for taint-safeness for anything newer. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D. Khera Communications, Inc. Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rockville, MD +1-240-453-8497 AIM: vivekkhera Y!: vivek_khera http://www.khera.org/~vivek/ ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
