>>>>> "TLS" == Tony L Svanstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
TLS> I want to add one thing: SA could actually be a weakness... TLS> As one rule among many this sure spamsign might not be enough to TLS> tag the e-mail as spam, and even if it is you'll just end up with TLS> yet another e-mail you have to check to see if it is a fp. Personally, I think that any rule that triggers only in the spam corpus, and never in the non-spam, it should have a minimum score of 1 or 2 (or even higher). -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Vivek Khera, Ph.D. Khera Communications, Inc. Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rockville, MD +1-240-453-8497 AIM: vivekkhera Y!: vivek_khera http://www.khera.org/~vivek/ ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk