>>>>> "TLS" == Tony L Svanstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

TLS>  I want to add one thing: SA could actually be a weakness...

TLS> As one rule among many this sure spamsign might not be enough to
TLS> tag the e-mail as spam, and even if it is you'll just end up with
TLS> yet another e-mail you have to check to see if it is a fp.

Personally, I think that any rule that triggers only in the spam
corpus, and never in the non-spam, it should have a minimum score of 1
or 2 (or even higher).

-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Vivek Khera, Ph.D.                Khera Communications, Inc.
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]       Rockville, MD       +1-240-453-8497
AIM: vivekkhera Y!: vivek_khera   http://www.khera.org/~vivek/


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to