spamassassin-talk  

Messages by Thread

• [SAtalk] Problem with razor2 check: No such file or directory Insecure dependency Wolfgang . Fuertbauer
  • Re: [SAtalk] Problem with razor2 check: No such file or directory Insecure dependency Daniel Quinlan
• [SAtalk] Spamd domain sockets implementation Mike Loiterman
  • Re: [SAtalk] Spamd domain sockets implementation Jim
  • Re: [SAtalk] Spamd domain sockets implementation Kenneth Porter
  • [SAtalk] Re: Spamd domain sockets implementation Malte S. Stretz
  • Re: [SAtalk] Spamd domain sockets implementation Bob Apthorpe
  • Re: [SAtalk] Spamd domain sockets implementation Mike Loiterman
  • [SAtalk] Re: Spamd domain sockets implementation Malte S. Stretz
• [SAtalk] Why is auto-learn set to no? Robert Nicholson
  • Re: [SAtalk] Why is auto-learn set to no? Robert Nicholson
  • Re: [SAtalk] Why is auto-learn set to no? Patrick Morris
  • Re: [SAtalk] Why is auto-learn set to no? Martin Radford
  • Re: [SAtalk] Why is auto-learn set to no? Renato G. Troitino
  • Re: [SAtalk] Why is auto-learn set to no? Theo Van Dinter
  • Re: [SAtalk] Why is auto-learn set to no? Martin Radford
• [SAtalk] Monitoring which Rules are being used... Steve Brorens
  • Re: [SAtalk] Monitoring which Rules are being used... Ryan Moore
• [SAtalk] SpamAssassin 2.60 release Michael Bell
  • Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin 2.60 release Daniel Quinlan
• [SAtalk] Cannot change scores Jay R. Yablon
  • Re: [SAtalk] Cannot change scores Matt Kettler
• [SAtalk] suddenly SA broke on me and provides this msg landy
• [SAtalk] SpamAssassin 2.60 released!! Theo Van Dinter
  • Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin 2.60 released!! Chris Paul
  • Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin 2.60 released!! Chris Paul
  • Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin 2.60 released!! landy
  • Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin 2.60 released!! landy
  • Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin 2.60 released!! Kenneth Porter
  • Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin 2.60 released!! Theo Van Dinter
• [SAtalk] local.cf not being read Stephen Lau
  • [SAtalk] Re: local.cf not being read Malte S. Stretz
• [SAtalk] Philosophical SA questions Darren Madams
  • Re: [SAtalk] Philosophical SA questions Kai MacTane
  • Re: [SAtalk] Philosophical SA questions Matt Kettler
  • Re: [SAtalk] Philosophical SA questions Robert Menschel
  • RE: [SAtalk] Philosophical SA questions Tom Meunier
• [SAtalk] upping BAYES_80 score Jonathan Nichols
  • Re: [SAtalk] upping BAYES_80 score Matt Kettler
• [SAtalk] SA Gone Wild??? Dan Tappin
  • Re: [SAtalk] SA Gone Wild??? Klaus Mueller
  • RE: [SAtalk] SA Gone Wild??? Dan Tappin
  • Re: [SAtalk] SA Gone Wild??? Kai Schaetzl
• RE: [SAtalk] Using Procmail with SpamAssassin for redirecting spa m email... Chris Santerre
• [SAtalk] How to add New Rules Bert Rapp
  • Re: [SAtalk] How to add New Rules Theo Van Dinter
• [SAtalk] HTML has images with 600-800 bytes of words Tory M Blue
  • Re: [SAtalk] HTML has images with 600-800 bytes of words Theo Van Dinter
• RE: [SAtalk] Using Procmail with SpamAssassin for redirecting spa m email... Chris Santerre
• [SAtalk] Virus checkers v.s. spam filters Philip Mak
  • [SAtalk] Re: Virus checkers v.s. spam filters Malte S. Stretz
  • RE: [SAtalk] Re: Virus checkers v.s. spam filters Bill Polhemus
• [SAtalk] Spam not Alicia Forsythe
  • Re: [SAtalk] Spam not mikea
  • RE: [SAtalk] Spam not Martin, Jeffrey
  • [SAtalk] autolearn=ham Landy
• [SAtalk] Help in Understanding how to make a local.cf file... L. D. James
  • RE: [SAtalk] Help in Understanding how to make a local.cf file... Chris Santerre
• [SAtalk] Best virus scanner? Philip Mak
  • Re: [SAtalk] Best virus scanner? Bob Sully
• [SAtalk] OBFUSCATING comment not matching. Seelig, CD (Chris)
  • Re: [SAtalk] OBFUSCATING comment not matching. Fred I-IS.COM
  • RE: [SAtalk] OBFUSCATING comment not matching. Seelig, CD (Chris)
  • RE: [SAtalk] OBFUSCATING comment not matching. Chris Santerre
• [SAtalk] Running spamd under daemontools with debugging enabled Ralf Guenthner
• [SAtalk] Error message from DCC since upgraded to RC5 Luis Hernán Otegui
  • Re: [SAtalk] Error message from DCC since upgraded to RC5 Daniel Quinlan
  • Re: [SAtalk] Error message from DCC since upgraded to RC5 Luis Hernán Otegui
  • Re: [SAtalk] Error message from DCC since upgraded to RC5 Daniel Quinlan
• [SAtalk] Proposal for X-Spam-Status Robert Nicholson
  • Re: [SAtalk] Proposal for X-Spam-Status Robert Nicholson
  • [SAtalk] Re: Proposal for X-Spam-Status Shane Williams
  • Re: [SAtalk] Proposal for X-Spam-Status Bob Apthorpe
• [SAtalk] 2.55 and FAILURE NOTICE's Robert Nicholson
  • Re: [SAtalk] 2.55 and FAILURE NOTICE's Ralf Guenthner
  • Re: [SAtalk] 2.55 and FAILURE NOTICE's Robert Nicholson
  • [SAtalk] 2.55 and FAILURE NOTICE's Robert Nicholson
  • Re: [SAtalk] 2.55 and FAILURE NOTICE's Daniel Quinlan
• [SAtalk] Better logging? Markus Gaugusch
  • RE: [SAtalk] Better logging? Tom Meunier
  • RE: [SAtalk] Better logging? Markus Gaugusch
  • RE: [SAtalk] Better logging? landy
  • Re: [SAtalk] Better logging? Matt Thoene
  • RE: [SAtalk] Better logging? Markus Gaugusch
  • Re: [SAtalk] Better logging? Jim Knuth
  • RE: [SAtalk] Better logging? Erik Slooff
  • Re: [SAtalk] Better logging? Jim Knuth
  • Re: [SAtalk] Better logging? mikea
  • RE: [SAtalk] Better logging? Tom Meunier
• [SAtalk] user_prefs or SQL prefs under Win32 SpamAssassin? Me
  • [SAtalk] user_prefs or SQL prefs under Win32 SpamAssassin? Todd Routhier - Lightwave Tech.
  • Re: [SAtalk] user_prefs or SQL prefs under Win32 SpamAssassin? Fred
• [SAtalk] SpamAssassin filters seem too weak out of the box... Mike Klein
  • Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin filters seem too weak out of the box... Matt Kettler
  • Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin filters seem too weak out of the box... Fred
  • RE: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin filters seem too weak out of the box... Tom Meunier
  • RE: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin filters seem too weak out of the box... Mike Klein
  • Re[2]: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin filters seem too weak out of the box... Abigail Marshall
  • RE: Re[2]: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin filters seem too weak out of the box... Mike Klein
  • Re[4]: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin filters seem too weak out of the box... Robert Menschel
  • Re[4]: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin filters seem too weak out of the box... Abigail Marshall
  • Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin filters seem too weak out of the box... Daniel Quinlan
  • RE: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin filters seem too weak out of the box... Tom Meunier
• [SAtalk] Running spam/nospam tests just sits there/hangs...what is required? Mike Klein
  • Re: [SAtalk] Running spam/nospam tests just sits there/hangs...what is required? Bob Apthorpe
• [SAtalk] summary landy
• [SAtalk] i would like to know how to score landy
  • Re: [SAtalk] i would like to know how to score Matt Kettler
• [SAtalk] why it pass SA landy
  • Re: [SAtalk] why it pass SA Matt Kettler
  • Re: [SAtalk] why it pass SA landy
• [SAtalk] All these Microsoft patch spams Philip Mak
  • Re: [SAtalk] All these Microsoft patch spams Matt Kettler
  • Re: [SAtalk] All these Microsoft patch spams landy
  • Re: [SAtalk] All these Microsoft patch spams Markus Gaugusch
  • Re: [SAtalk] All these Microsoft patch spams Matt Kettler
  • Re: [SAtalk] All these Microsoft patch spams Russ
  • Re: [SAtalk] All these Microsoft patch spams Kenneth Porter
  • RE: [SAtalk] All these Microsoft patch spams Dallas L. Engelken
  • RE: [SAtalk] All these Microsoft patch spams Larry Gilson
  • RE: [SAtalk] All these Microsoft patch spams Kenneth Porter
• [SAtalk] Blacklist from Jim Knuth
  • Re: [SAtalk] Blacklist from Matt Kettler
  • Re: [SAtalk] Blacklist from Jim Knuth
  • Re: [SAtalk] Blacklist from Matt Kettler
• [SAtalk] Really really simple spams - not enough to accumulate 4 points Ed Greenberg
  • RE: [SAtalk] Really really simple spams - not enough to accumulate 4 points Tom Meunier
• [SAtalk] Bayes questions Ed Greenberg
  • RE: [SAtalk] Bayes questions Tom Meunier
  • Re: [SAtalk] Bayes questions Dave Kliczbor
  • Re: [SAtalk] Bayes questions Tony Lill
  • Re: [SAtalk] Bayes questions Dave Kliczbor
• [SAtalk] to much spam landy
  • Re: [SAtalk] to much spam Robert Menschel
• [SAtalk] how does it work Muhannad Tamemi
• [SAtalk] defang every (spam) mail Robert Kehl
• [SAtalk] Autodeleting spam based on score without deleting all spam Mike Shkolnik
  • Re: [SAtalk] Autodeleting spam based on score without deleting all spam Steven W. Orr
  • Re: [SAtalk] Autodeleting spam based on score without deleting all spam Tomáš Macek
  • Re: [SAtalk] Autodeleting spam based on score without deleting all spam Patrick Morris
  • Re: [SAtalk] Autodeleting spam based on score without deleting all spam Tomáš Macek
  • Re: [SAtalk] Autodeleting spam based on score without deleting all spam Jim
  • Re: [SAtalk] Autodeleting spam based on score without deleting all spam Benny Pedersen
  • RE: [SAtalk] Autodeleting spam based on score without deleting all spam Mike Shkolnik
  • Re: [SAtalk] Autodeleting spam based on score without deleting all spam Jim
  • Re[2]: [SAtalk] Autodeleting spam based on score without deleting all spam Robert Menschel
  • Re: Re[2]: [SAtalk] Autodeleting spam based on score without deleting all spam Mike Carlson
  • Re: Re[2]: [SAtalk] Autodeleting spam based on score without deleting all spam Sean McCrohan
  • Re: Re[2]: [SAtalk] Autodeleting spam based on score without deleting all spam David B Funk
  • Re: Re[2]: [SAtalk] Autodeleting spam based on score without deleting all spam Mike Carlson
  • Re: Re[2]: [SAtalk] Autodeleting spam based on score without deleting all spam Martin Schroeder
  • RE: Re[2]: [SAtalk] Autodeleting spam based on score without deleting all spam Bill
  • SMTP reject != bounce (was Re[2]: [SAtalk] Autodeleting spam based on score without deleting all spam) David B Funk
  • Re: Re[2]: [SAtalk] Autodeleting spam based on score without deleting all spam David B Funk
  • [SAtalk] Re: Autodeleting spam based on score without deleting all spam Michael Schaap
  • Re: [SAtalk] Re: Autodeleting spam based on score without deleting all spam Simon Byrnand
  • Re: [SAtalk] Re: Autodeleting spam based on score without deleting all spam David B Funk
  • Re: [SAtalk] Autodeleting spam based on score without deleting all spam Abigail Marshall
  • RE: [SAtalk] Autodeleting spam based on score without deleting all spam Mike Shkolnik
  • Re[2]: [SAtalk] Autodeleting spam based on score without deleting all spam Abigail Marshall
  • RE: [SAtalk] Autodeleting spam based on score without deleting all spam Tom Meunier
  • RE: [SAtalk] Autodeleting spam based on score without deleting all spam Tom Meunier
  • RE: [SAtalk] Autodeleting spam based on score without deleting all spam Tomáš Macek
• [SAtalk] Spamassassin algorithm question. Mark London
  • Re: [SAtalk] Spamassassin algorithm question. Fred
  • Re: [SAtalk] Spamassassin algorithm question. Patrick Morris
• [SAtalk] blocking executable's Drew Wymore
  • Re: [SAtalk] blocking executable's Daniel Quinlan
• [SAtalk] microsoft worm - working solution Andreas Kotowicz
  • Re: [SAtalk] microsoft worm - working solution Carlo Wood
  • [SAtalk] microsoft worm - working solution Andreas Kotowicz
  • RE: [SAtalk] microsoft worm - working solution Chris Santerre
  • RE: [SAtalk] microsoft worm - working solution Dave Stern - Former Rocket Scientist
• [SAtalk] Spamassassin and qmail? Michael W. Cocke
  • Re: [SAtalk] Spamassassin and qmail? john
  • [SAtalk] Re: Spamassassin and qmail? william f guyton jr
  • Re: [SAtalk] Re: Spamassassin and qmail? Michael W. Cocke
  • Re: [SAtalk] Re: Spamassassin and qmail? Stephane Lentz
  • Re: [SAtalk] Re: Spamassassin and qmail? Tomáš Macek
  • Re: [SAtalk] Re: Spamassassin and qmail? john
  • [SAtalk] Re: Spamassassin and qmail? drew
  • Re: [SAtalk] Re: Spamassassin and qmail? up
  • RE: [SAtalk] Re: Spamassassin and qmail? Ian Southam
  • Re: [SAtalk] Re: Spamassassin and qmail? Dave Kliczbor
  • Re: [SAtalk] Re: Spamassassin and qmail? Michael W. Cocke
  • RE: [SAtalk] Re: Spamassassin and qmail? Daniel
• [SAtalk] SpamAssassin 2.60 rc5 Peter P. Benac
  • Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin 2.60 rc5 Martin Radford
• [SAtalk] SA-2.60rc5 problem Odhiambo Washington
  • Re: [SAtalk] SA-2.60rc5 problem Theo Van Dinter
  • Re: [SAtalk] SA-2.60rc5 problem Odhiambo Washington
• [SAtalk] 2.60 Doc Changes Mike Loiterman
  • Re: [SAtalk] 2.60 Doc Changes Daniel Quinlan
  • RE: [SAtalk] 2.60 Doc Changes Mike Loiterman
  • RE: [SAtalk] 2.60 Doc Changes Daniel Quinlan
• [SAtalk] Using Procmail with SpamAssassin for redirecting spam email... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  • Re: [SAtalk] Using Procmail with SpamAssassin for redirecting spam email... Jim
• [SAtalk] Negative score from spamd, positive from spamassassin script up
  • Re: [SAtalk] Negative score from spamd, positive from spamassassin script Fred I-IS.COM
  • Re: [SAtalk] Negative score from spamd, positive from spamassassin script up

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]