At Tue Sep 23 06:52:40 2003, Patrick Morris wrote:
> Robert Nicholson wrote:
> 
> > X-Spam-Status:
> > Yes, hits=10.7 required=0.6 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_03_06,
> > DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K,FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML,HTML_60_70,
> > HTML_FONTCOLOR_BLUE,HTML_FONTCOLOR_GREEN,HTML_FONTCOLOR_RED,
> > HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY,MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI,MISSING_MIMEOLE,
> > NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP autolearn=no version=2.60
> >
> > Why is autolearn=no
> 
> That means that particular message was not auto-learned, since the score
> wasn't high enough.  It doesn't mean autolearning is disabled.

Interesting point.  Perhaps instead of "autolearn=", it should read:

  autolearnt=ham/spam/no
or 
  autolearned=ham/spam/no

(depending on spelling preference :-)

Martin
-- 
Martin Radford              |   "Only wimps use tape backup: _real_ 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | men just upload their important stuff  -o)
Registered Linux user #9257 |  on ftp and let the rest of the world  /\\
- see http://counter.li.org |       mirror it ;)"  - Linus Torvalds _\_V


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to