On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 20:19:34 +0700 Robert Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In addition to the tests that were performed I'd like to see the effect
> on the overall score each test had.
>
> so instead of
>
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.6 required=0.6
> tests=IN_REP_TO,NO_REAL_NAME,REFERENCES,X_AUTH_WARNING,X_LOOP
> version=2.55
>
> I'd like to see (-1.0) etc after each test. so that I can easily see
> which test skewed the score.
Try
egrep 'IN_REP_TO|NO_REAL_NAME|REFERENCES|X_AUTH_WARNING|X_LOOP' \
/usr/share/spamassassin/50_scores.cf
score IN_REP_TO -0.498 -0.499 -0.498 -0.369
score NO_REAL_NAME 0.993 0.820 1.137 1.149
score REFERENCES -0.498 -0.499 -0.498 -0.001
score X_AUTH_WARNING -0.498 -0.399 0.0 -0.398
score X_LOOP 0.001
There are known weaknesses in the 2.5x ruleset, specifically in
negative-scoring rules like IN_REP_TO and REFERENCES; I haven't seen
X_AUTH_WARNING abused until now.
Add the following to /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf or
~/.spamassassin/user_prefs:
score MSGID_GOOD_EXCHANGE 0.0
score IN_REP_TO 0.0
score REFERENCES 0.0
score EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0.0
score X_AUTH_WARNING 0.0
Also, use sa-learn on those messages that sneak past SA.
hth,
--
Bob Apthorpe
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
