At 07:17 PM 9/21/03 -0400, landy wrote:
how does this sum 4.0,

Not to be rude, but this is so easy you really should be able to answer it yourself. The scores of the rules are added together.


So, looking at 50_scores.cf and yanking out the score lines we get:

score FREE_TRIAL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.017
score NO_REAL_NAME 0.993 0.820 1.137 1.149
score RCVD_IN_SBL 0.0 1.013 0.0 1.101
score STOCK_PICK 0.0 0.0 0.812 0.182
score SUBJ_BUY 0.813 1.898 0.808 1.586

Based on the rules that matched, you obviously are using bayes and network checks, otherwise FREE_TRIAL would never show up. Hence, you must be using the set3 scores.


If you add all of the set3 scores (which is the last one on each line since set0 is the first) you get a total score of 4.035



and the best way to make it score 5.0

Since you're using bayes, I'd suggest revisiting your bayes training. This email wound up at the 50/50 mark on the bayes analysis, and that's a bit suspicious. I'd very much wonder if the HTML of this message is hiding some bayes poison.






-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to