spamassassin-talk  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [SAtalk] sa-learn question... Jim Ford
• [SAtalk] spamd/spamc parameters Daniel Daley
• [SAtalk] Attachment headers in body, rawbody, or header? David Parr
• [SAtalk] How to call SA in Sendmail? Leo Huang
  • Re: [SAtalk] How to call SA in Sendmail? Matt Kettler
  • Re: [SAtalk] How to call SA in Sendmail? Patrick Morris
  • RE: [SAtalk] How to call SA in Sendmail? Mark Emerle
  • Re: [SAtalk] How to call SA in Sendmail? Patrick Morris
  • Re: [SAtalk] How to call SA in Sendmail? Thomas Cameron
  • Re: [SAtalk] How to call SA in Sendmail? Thomas Cameron
  • Re: [SAtalk] How to call SA in Sendmail? alan premselaar
  • Re: [SAtalk] How to call SA in Sendmail? Thomas Cameron
• [SAtalk] Bayes Database. Marek Dohojda
• [SAtalk] Running spamd supervised? Ralf Guenthner
  • RE: [SAtalk] Running spamd supervised? Dallas L. Engelken
  • Re: [SAtalk] Running spamd supervised? Ralf Guenthner
• [SAtalk] Bug 1927 - spamd looping - v2.54 Dallas L. Engelken
  • RE: [SAtalk] Bug 1927 - spamd looping - v2.54 Dallas L. Engelken
  • RE: [SAtalk] Bug 1927 - spamd looping - v2.54 David Prall
• [SAtalk] spamd "simply replaces" spamassassin? don't think so Iago
  • Re: [SAtalk] spamd "simply replaces" spamassassin? don't think so Jim Ford
  • Re: [SAtalk] spamd "simply replaces" spamassassin? don't think so Martin Radford
  • Re: [SAtalk] spamd "simply replaces" spamassassin? d on't think so Hannu Liljemark
  • RE: [SAtalk] spamd "simply replaces" spamassassin? don't think so McClung, Darren W.
  • RE: [SAtalk] spamd "simply replaces" spamassassin? don't think so Chris Santerre
• [SAtalk] re: Help in installation Jon Miller
  • [SAtalk] Re: Help in installation Dan Jacobson
  • Re: [SAtalk] Re: Help in installation Tony Earnshaw
• [SAtalk] Two new techniques or old hat? adivvy
  • Re: [SAtalk] Two new techniques or old hat? Kelson Vibber
  • Re: [SAtalk] Two new techniques or old hat? Kris Deugau
  • Re: [SAtalk] Two new techniques or old hat? Kai Schaetzl
  • Re: [SAtalk] Two new techniques or old hat? Vivek Khera
  • Re: [SAtalk] Two new techniques or old hat? Kris Deugau
  • Re: [SAtalk] Two new techniques or old hat? Daniel Quinlan
• [SAtalk] Bug in whitelist_from? Adam T. Bowen
  • Re: [SAtalk] Bug in whitelist_from? Matt Kettler
  • Re: [SAtalk] Bug in whitelist_from? Adam T. Bowen
  • Re: [SAtalk] Bug in whitelist_from? Matt Kettler
  • Re: [SAtalk] Bug in whitelist_from? Simon Byrnand
• [SAtalk] skip some ip's to be checked Muenz, Michael
• RE: [SAtalk] Newbies? Thomas Kinghorn
• [SAtalk] Procmail+Spamassassin Recipe David Jacobson
• [SAtalk] USER_AGENT_MOZILLA scores Dr. Juergen Klueners
  • Re: [SAtalk] USER_AGENT_MOZILLA scores Kai Schaetzl
  • Re: [SAtalk] USER_AGENT_MOZILLA scores Theo Van Dinter
• AW: [SAtalk] best way for off-host users to submit to sa-learn? Martin Bene
  • Re: AW: [SAtalk] best way for off-host users to submit to sa-learn? Gary Schrock
• [SAtalk] "required hits" option t macek
  • Re: [SAtalk] "required hits" option Hannu Liljemark
  • Re: [SAtalk] "required hits" option t macek
• [SAtalk] Am I screwing up my bayes database? Tom Diehl
  • Re: [SAtalk] Am I screwing up my bayes database? Tony Earnshaw
• [SAtalk] ANNOUNCE: mass-checks starting for 2.60 Justin Mason
• [SAtalk] re: SA installation problem Jon Miller
  • Re: [SAtalk] re: SA installation problem Bob Apthorpe
• [SAtalk] learning mailserver headers Simon Byrnand
  • Re: [SAtalk] learning mailserver headers Justin Mason
  • Re: [SAtalk] learning mailserver headers Simon Byrnand
  • Re: [SAtalk] learning mailserver headers Justin Mason
  • Fwd: Re: [SAtalk] learning mailserver headers Simon Byrnand
  • Re: [SAtalk] learning mailserver headers Kai Schaetzl
• [SAtalk] Data Format Error Leo Huang
• [SAtalk] Default Scores of 0.001 R . W .
  • Re: [SAtalk] Default Scores of 0.001 Daniel Quinlan
  • [SAtalk] turning on the 0 score tests Dan Jacobson
  • Re: [SAtalk] Default Scores of 0.001 Matt Kettler
• [SAtalk] Reloading SpamAssassin's Preferences? Daniel M. Zimmerman
• [SAtalk] best way for off-host users to submit to sa-learn? Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC
  • Re: [SAtalk] best way for off-host users to submit to sa-learn? Leo Huang
  • Re: [SAtalk] best way for off-host users to submit to sa-learn? Chad Leigh -- Pengar Enterprises Inc
  • RE: [SAtalk] best way for off-host users to submit to sa-learn? sietze
  • Re: [SAtalk] best way for off-host users to submit to sa-learn? Robert Menschel
• [SAtalk] mrtg Ronny Roethof
  • RE: [SAtalk] mrtg Peter P. Benac
  • Re: [SAtalk] mrtg Tim Litwiller
  • RE: [SAtalk] mrtg Peter P. Benac
  • [SAtalk] mrtg Jason Philbrook
• [SAtalk] baeys config parameters? Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC
  • RE: [SAtalk] baeys config parameters? Tom Meunier
  • Re: [SAtalk] baeys config parameters? Theo Van Dinter
  • Re: [SAtalk] baeys config parameters? Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC
• [SAtalk] IMAP: Mark as read? Brian Klug
  • Re: [SAtalk] IMAP: Mark as read? Jim Cunning
  • Re: [SAtalk] IMAP: Mark as read? Brian Klug
  • Re: [SAtalk] IMAP: Mark as read? Kenneth Porter
• [SAtalk] Error message in /var/log/maillog confusion jwelk
• [SAtalk] Intriguing header forgery Martin Radford
  • Re: [SAtalk] Intriguing header forgery Tony Earnshaw
  • RE: [SAtalk] Intriguing header forgery Chris Santerre
• [SAtalk] why not use SA on this SA list? Dan Jacobson
  • Re: [SAtalk] why not use SA on this SA list? Martin Radford
  • Re: [SAtalk] why not use SA on this SA list? Alan Leghart
  • Re: [SAtalk] why not use SA on this SA list? Benjamin A. Shelton
  • Re: [SAtalk] why not use SA on this SA list? Steve Thomas
  • Re: [SAtalk] why not use SA on this SA list? Alexander Litvinov
• [SAtalk] Getting a full report on uncaught spam Mike Mills
  • Re: [SAtalk] Getting a full report on uncaught spam Matt Kettler
  • Re: [SAtalk] Getting a full report on uncaught spam Theo Van Dinter
  • Re: [SAtalk] Getting a full report on uncaught spam Jim Ford
• [SAtalk] HEADER: Delivered-To: Demitrious S. Kelly
  • Re: [SAtalk] HEADER: Delivered-To: Theo Van Dinter
  • Re: [SAtalk] HEADER: Delivered-To: Demitrious S. Kelly
  • Re: [SAtalk] HEADER: Delivered-To: Theo Van Dinter
  • Re: [SAtalk] HEADER: Delivered-To: Demitrious S. Kelly
• [SAtalk] Sitewide config Richard Humphrey
  • Re: [SAtalk] Sitewide config Theo Van Dinter
• [SAtalk] A question or two... Wendell Smith
  • Re: [SAtalk] A question or two... Theo Van Dinter
• [SAtalk] Problem W / Postfix SpamAssassin transport Nichols, William
• [SAtalk] Spamassassin and qmail-scanner Joe Young
  • [SAtalk] Spamassassin and qmail-scanner Joe Young
  • Re: [SAtalk] Spamassassin and qmail-scanner Ralf Guenthner
  • Re: [SAtalk] Spamassassin and qmail-scanner Joe Young
  • [SAtalk] Spamassassin and qmail-scanner Joe Young
  • RE: [SAtalk] Spamassassin and qmail-scanner Dallas L. Engelken
• [SAtalk] Wrapping spamassassin in a multi-threaded C program? Joe Flowers
• [SAtalk] SA with sendmail Dennis Breithaupt
• [SAtalk] Re: Quick question Luis Hernán Otegui
• [SAtalk] where to install.. Céline REDON
  • Re: [SAtalk] where to install.. Leo Huang
  • Re: [SAtalk] where to install.. Tony Earnshaw
• [SAtalk] New (to me) spam technique Robert Menschel
  • Re: [SAtalk] New (to me) spam technique Justin Mason
  • RE: [SAtalk] New (to me) spam technique Darren Coleman
  • Re: [SAtalk] New (to me) spam technique mikea
  • RE: [SAtalk] New (to me) spam technique Matt Kettler
• [SAtalk] "full" test and attachments honema
  • Re: [SAtalk] "full" test and attachments Matt Kettler
• [SAtalk] How do I know whether Bayes is working or not? Leo Huang
  • Re: [SAtalk] How do I know whether Bayes is working or not? SqM
  • Re: [SAtalk] How do I know whether Bayes is working or not? Leo Huang
  • Re: [SAtalk] How do I know whether Bayes is working or not? SqM
  • Re: [SAtalk] How do I know whether Bayes is working or not? Kris Deugau
  • Re: [SAtalk] How do I know whether Bayes is working or not? Kai Schaetzl
  • Re: [SAtalk] How do I know whether Bayes is working or not? Morten Kjeldgaard
  • Re: [SAtalk] How do I know whether Bayes is working or not? Chris Halverson
  • Re: [SAtalk] How do I know whether Bayes is working or not? Patrick Morris
  • Re: [SAtalk] How do I know whether Bayes is working or not? Martin Radford
  • Re: [SAtalk] How do I know whether Bayes is working or not? Justin Mason
  • Re: [SAtalk] How do I know whether Bayes is working or not? Morten Kjeldgaard
  • Re: [SAtalk] How do I know whether Bayes is working or not? Jim Ford
  • Re: [SAtalk] How do I know whether Bayes is working or not? Theo Van Dinter
  • Re: [SAtalk] How do I know whether Bayes is working or not? Justin Mason
• [SAtalk] Creative spam, any ideas? Ralf Guenthner
  • Re: [SAtalk] Creative spam, any ideas? Robert Menschel
  • Re: [SAtalk] Creative spam, any ideas? Ralf Guenthner
  • RE: [SAtalk] Creative spam, any ideas? Chris Santerre
• [SAtalk] why is this not caught? Martin Maechler
  • Re: [SAtalk] why is this not caught? Matt Kettler
• [SAtalk] 2.60-cvs (20030627) rules ODHIAMBO Washington
  • Re: [SAtalk] 2.60-cvs (20030627) rules Martin Radford
  • Re: [SAtalk] 2.60-cvs (20030627) rules ODHIAMBO Washington
• [SAtalk] merge sh script SA caller into .procmailrc Dan Jacobson
• [SAtalk] Is this "machine-homogenized intrisic pork-offal-vegetable-based-brains-likewisecanned substance" [Fwd: Ode to the Love : invitation] Tony Earnshaw
• [SAtalk] High Bayes scores with 2.60-pr1 Martin Radford
  • Re: [SAtalk] High Bayes scores with 2.60-pr1 Justin Mason
• [SAtalk] BUGGY_CGI? Spam Sucks
  • Re: [SAtalk] BUGGY_CGI? Martin Radford
  • Re[2]: [SAtalk] BUGGY_CGI? Abigail Marshall
  • Re: [SAtalk] BUGGY_CGI? Matt Kettler
  • RE: [SAtalk] BUGGY_CGI? Mad Martian
  • Re: [SAtalk] BUGGY_CGI? Kai Schaetzl
  • RE: [SAtalk] BUGGY_CGI? Mad Martian
  • RE: [SAtalk] BUGGY_CGI? Mad Martian
  • Re: [SAtalk] BUGGY_CGI? Kai Schaetzl
  • Re: [SAtalk] BUGGY_CGI? Bob Apthorpe
  • RE: [SAtalk] BUGGY_CGI? Mad Martian
  • Re: [SAtalk] BUGGY_CGI? Kai Schaetzl
  • RE: [SAtalk] BUGGY_CGI? Mad Martian
  • RE: [SAtalk] BUGGY_CGI? Darren Shrubsole
  • Re: [SAtalk] BUGGY_CGI? Bob Apthorpe
  • RE: [SAtalk] BUGGY_CGI? Spam Sucks
• [SAtalk] spamassassin and razor won't work together Chris
  • [SAtalk] spamassassin and razor won't work together Christof Wessely
• [SAtalk] 2.60 RC1 make test errors (not Invalid Date) Jay Levitt
  • Re: [SAtalk] 2.60 RC1 make test errors (not Invalid Date) Theo Van Dinter
• [SAtalk] Spammers using bounces and encoding Michael Long
  • Re: [SAtalk] Spammers using bounces and encoding Frank Pineau
  • Re: [SAtalk] Spammers using bounces and encoding SqM
  • Re: [SAtalk] Spammers using bounces and encoding Jerry Bell
  • Re: [SAtalk] Spammers using bounces and encoding SqM
  • Re: [SAtalk] Spammers using bounces and encoding Jerry Bell
• [SAtalk] This one got through (and an idea). Steve Prior
  • Re: [SAtalk] This one got through (and an idea). Frank Pineau
• [SAtalk] Chinese spam vs. Chinese non spam Dan Jacobson
  • Re: [SAtalk] Chinese spam vs. Chinese non spam Justin Mason
  • [SAtalk] New Domain spam Steve Phariss
  • Re: [SAtalk] New Domain spam Kai Schaetzl
  • Re: [SAtalk] New Domain spam Steve Phariss
  • Re: [SAtalk] New Domain spam Thomas Cameron
  • Re: [SAtalk] New Domain spam Kai Schaetzl
• [SAtalk] Need rule to filter out spying <img> tags MBR
  • RE: [SAtalk] Need rule to filter out spying <img> tags Mathew Hendry
  • Re: [SAtalk] Need rule to filter out spying <img> tags Tony Earnshaw
  • Re: [SAtalk] Need rule to filter out spying <img> tags MBR
  • Re: [SAtalk] Need rule to filter out spying <img> tags Robert Menschel
  • RE: [SAtalk] Need rule to filter out spying <img> tags Darren Coleman
  • Re: [SAtalk] Need rule to filter out spying <img> tags Kai Schaetzl
• [SAtalk] [Fwd: FWD: national opt-out directory] Warren Togami

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]