tagging  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [Tagging] How to Tag Steps in a Bridleway Graeme Fitzpatrick
  • Re: [Tagging] How to Tag Steps in a Bridleway Jo
  • Re: [Tagging] How to Tag Steps in a Bridleway Martin Koppenhoefer
  • Re: [Tagging] How to Tag Steps in a Bridleway Peter Neale via Tagging
  • Re: [Tagging] How to Tag Steps in a Bridleway Warin
  • Re: [Tagging] How to Tag Steps in a Bridleway Graeme Fitzpatrick
  • Re: [Tagging] How to Tag Steps in a Bridleway Andy Townsend
  • Re: [Tagging] How to Tag Steps in a Bridleway Jens Glad Balchen via Tagging
  • Re: [Tagging] How to Tag Steps in a Bridleway Peter Neale via Tagging
  • Re: [Tagging] How to Tag Steps in a Bridleway Jass Kurn
  • Re: [Tagging] How to Tag Steps in a Bridleway Jo
  • [Tagging] Difference between "yes" and "designated" in access tags (was: Re: How to Tag Steps in a Bridleway) Andy Townsend
  • Re: [Tagging] Difference between "yes" and "designated" in access tags (was: Re: How to Tag Steps in a Bridleway) stevea
  • Re: [Tagging] Difference between "yes" and "designated" in access tags (was: Re: How to Tag Steps in a Bridleway) stevea
  • Re: [Tagging] Difference between "yes" and "designated" in access tags (was: Re: How to Tag Steps in a Bridleway) Andrew Harvey
  • Re: [Tagging] Difference between "yes" and "designated" in access tags Andrew Welch via Tagging
  • Re: [Tagging] Difference between "yes" and "designated" in access tags Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
  • Re: [Tagging] Difference between "yes" and "designated" in access tags Graeme Fitzpatrick
  • Re: [Tagging] Difference between "yes" and "designated" in access tags Martin Koppenhoefer
  • Re: [Tagging] Difference between "yes" and "designated" in access tags Szem
  • Re: [Tagging] Difference between "yes" and "designated" in access tags Martin Koppenhoefer
  • Re: [Tagging] Difference between "yes" and "designated" in access tags Niels Elgaard Larsen
  • Re: [Tagging] Difference between "yes" and "designated" in access tags Jens Glad Balchen via Tagging
  • Re: [Tagging] Difference between "yes" and "designated" in access tags Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
  • Re: [Tagging] Difference between "yes" and "designated" in access tags (was: Re: How to Tag Steps in a Bridleway) Natfoot
  • Re: [Tagging] Difference between "yes" and "designated" in access tags (was: Re: How to Tag Steps in a Bridleway) stevea
  • Re: [Tagging] Difference between "yes" and "designated" in access tags (was: Re: How to Tag Steps in a Bridleway) stevea
  • Re: [Tagging] Difference between "yes" and "designated" in access tags (was: Re: How to Tag Steps in a Bridleway) stevea
  • Re: [Tagging] Difference between "yes" and "designated" in access tags (was: Re: How to Tag Steps in a Bridleway) Jass Kurn
  • Re: [Tagging] Difference between "yes" and "designated" in access tags Greg Troxel
  • Re: [Tagging] Difference between "yes" and "designated" in access tags Andy Townsend
  • Re: [Tagging] How to Tag Steps in a Bridleway Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
  • Re: [Tagging] How to Tag Steps in a Bridleway Jens Glad Balchen via Tagging
  • Re: [Tagging] How to Tag Steps in a Bridleway Mike Thompson
• [Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - works:type and works:process Daniel Evans
  • Re: [Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - works:type and works:process Marc_marc via Tagging
  • Re: [Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - works:type and works:process Daniel Evans
  • Re: [Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - works:type and works:process Daniel Evans
  • Re: [Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - works:type and works:process Martin Koppenhoefer
  • Re: [Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - works:type and works:process Daniel Evans
  • Re: [Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - works:type and works:process Martin Koppenhoefer
• [Tagging] Direct reduced iron plants Daniel Evans
  • Re: [Tagging] Direct reduced iron plants _ _
  • Re: [Tagging] Direct reduced iron plants Daniel Evans
  • Re: [Tagging] Direct reduced iron plants Martin Koppenhoefer
  • Re: [Tagging] Direct reduced iron plants Daniel Evans
  • Re: [Tagging] Direct reduced iron plants Martin Koppenhoefer
  • Re: [Tagging] Direct reduced iron plants Daniel Evans
  • Re: [Tagging] Direct reduced iron plants Martin Koppenhoefer
• [Tagging] Highway classification in Antarctica Fernando Trebien
  • Re: [Tagging] Highway classification in Antarctica Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
  • Re: [Tagging] Highway classification in Antarctica Fernando Trebien
  • Re: [Tagging] Highway classification in Antarctica Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
  • Re: [Tagging] Highway classification in Antarctica Brian M. Sperlongano
  • Re: [Tagging] Highway classification in Antarctica Fernando Trebien
  • Re: [Tagging] Highway classification in Antarctica Frederik Ramm
  • Re: [Tagging] Highway classification in Antarctica Martin Koppenhoefer
  • Re: [Tagging] Highway classification in Antarctica Martin Koppenhoefer
  • Re: [Tagging] Highway classification in Antarctica Christoph Hormann
  • Re: [Tagging] Highway classification in Antarctica Fernando Trebien
  • Re: [Tagging] Highway classification in Antarctica Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
  • Re: [Tagging] Highway classification in Antarctica Fernando Trebien
  • Re: [Tagging] Highway classification in Antarctica Fernando Trebien
  • Re: [Tagging] Highway classification in Antarctica Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
  • Re: [Tagging] Highway classification in Antarctica Fernando Trebien
  • Re: [Tagging] Highway classification in Antarctica Warin
  • Re: [Tagging] Highway classification in Antarctica Fernando Trebien
  • Re: [Tagging] Highway classification in Antarctica Fernando Trebien
  • Re: [Tagging] Highway classification in Antarctica Brian M. Sperlongano
  • Re: [Tagging] Highway classification in Antarctica Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
  • Re: [Tagging] Highway classification in Antarctica Martin Koppenhoefer
  • Re: [Tagging] Highway classification in Antarctica Frederik Ramm
  • Re: [Tagging] Highway classification in Antarctica Fernando Trebien
  • Re: [Tagging] Highway classification in Antarctica Christoph Hormann
  • Re: [Tagging] Highway classification in Antarctica Brian M. Sperlongano
  • Re: [Tagging] Highway classification in Antarctica Fernando Trebien
  • Re: [Tagging] Highway classification in Antarctica Martin Koppenhoefer
  • Re: [Tagging] Highway classification in Antarctica Juan Pablo Tolosa Sanzana
  • Re: [Tagging] Highway classification in Antarctica Fernando Trebien
  • Re: [Tagging] Highway classification in Antarctica Fernando Trebien
  • Re: [Tagging] Highway classification in Antarctica Juan Pablo Tolosa Sanzana
  • Re: [Tagging] Highway classification in Antarctica Martin Koppenhoefer
  • Re: [Tagging] Highway classification in Antarctica Fernando Trebien
  • Re: [Tagging] Highway classification in Antarctica Warin
  • Re: [Tagging] Highway classification in Antarctica Fernando Trebien
  • Re: [Tagging] Highway classification in Antarctica Juan Pablo Tolosa Sanzana
  • Re: [Tagging] Highway classification in Antarctica Fernando Trebien
  • Re: [Tagging] Highway classification in Antarctica Juan Pablo Tolosa Sanzana
  • Re: [Tagging] Highway classification in Antarctica Fernando Trebien
  • Re: [Tagging] Highway classification in Antarctica Juan Pablo Tolosa Sanzana
  • Re: [Tagging] Highway classification in Antarctica Fernando Trebien
  • Re: [Tagging] Highway classification in Antarctica Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
  • Re: [Tagging] Highway classification in Antarctica Fernando Trebien
  • Re: [Tagging] Highway classification in Antarctica Martin Koppenhoefer
  • Re: [Tagging] Highway classification in Antarctica Juan Pablo Tolosa Sanzana
  • Re: [Tagging] Highway classification in Antarctica Martin Koppenhoefer
  • Re: [Tagging] Highway classification in Antarctica Felipe Edwards
• [Tagging] [Voting] Feature Proposal - open= Wieland Breitfeld
• [Tagging] Request for help in determining how to tag car barriers Jens Glad Balchen via Tagging
• [Tagging] traffic_signs: human readable values vs. ISO and law codes yo paseopor
  • Re: [Tagging] traffic_signs: human readable values vs. ISO and law codes Martin Koppenhoefer
  • Re: [Tagging] traffic_signs: human readable values vs. ISO and law codes Greg Troxel
  • Re: [Tagging] traffic_signs: human readable values vs. ISO and law codes Martin Koppenhoefer
• [Tagging] [RFC] Deprecation of the `railway=facility` tag Máté Gyöngyösi via Tagging
  • Re: [Tagging] [RFC] Deprecation of the `railway=facility` tag stevea
  • Re: [Tagging] [RFC] Deprecation of the `railway=facility` tag Máté Gyöngyösi via Tagging
• [Tagging] Please join the OSM accessibility initiative bkil
  • Re: [Tagging] Please join the OSM accessibility initiative Simon Poole
  • Re: [Tagging] Please join the OSM accessibility initiative bkil
  • Re: [Tagging] Please join the OSM accessibility initiative Hartmut Holzgraefe
  • Re: [Tagging] Please join the OSM accessibility initiative bkil
• [Tagging] [Voting] Feature Proposal - traffic signs national id and human readable values (traffic_sign=* and traffic_sign:id=*) yo paseopor
• [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Laboratory:biosafety level fireball73--- via Tagging
• [Tagging] The reason to not use loc_name is far too subjective. Dave F via Tagging
  • Re: [Tagging] The reason to not use loc_name is far too subjective. Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
  • Re: [Tagging] The reason to not use loc_name is far too subjective. Martin Koppenhoefer
• [Tagging] Where should name tags be added on administrative boundaries? Julien Etienne
  • Re: [Tagging] Where should name tags be added on administrative boundaries? Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
• [Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - (Charging connectors) Kevin Quiatkowski via Tagging
• [Tagging] capacities for tents, caravans, and motorhomes on tourism=caravan_site Niels Elgaard Larsen
• [Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - Tag:natural=fiery_fountain Gabriele Sani via Tagging
• [Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - Key:opened= Wieland Breitfeld
• [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Approved - GTFS Tagging Standard Zoon van Michiel
• [Tagging] RFC: Social facility=equine assisted centre Cody Marine
• [Tagging] [Voting] Feature Proposal - Elevator Dimensions Wieland Breitfeld
• [Tagging] clootie trees/ rag trees Anne-Karoline Distel via Tagging
  • Re: [Tagging] clootie trees/ rag trees Anne-Karoline Distel via Tagging
  • Re: [Tagging] clootie trees/ rag trees Philip Barnes
  • Re: [Tagging] Re: clootie trees/ rag trees Anne- Karoline Distel via Tagging
  • Re: [Tagging] clootie trees/ rag trees Warin
  • Re: [Tagging] Re: clootie trees/ rag trees Anne- Karoline Distel via Tagging
  • Re: [Tagging] clootie trees/ rag trees Jass Kurn
• [Tagging] [Voting] Feature Proposal - Barbers (hairdresser=barber) Nathan Case
• [Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - Deprecating demolished railway tags Ewrt1 OSM
  • Re: [Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - Deprecating demolished railway tags Volker Schmidt
  • Re: [Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - Deprecating demolished railway tags Frederik Ramm
• [Tagging] What is the recommended tagging approach for routing narrow residential roads? Julien Etienne
• [Tagging] Draft Proposal: Tagging Equine-Assisted Therapeutic Centers Cody Marine
• [Tagging] tagging "loose" paving stones Anne-Karoline Distel via Tagging
  • Re: [Tagging] tagging "loose" paving stones Åbn
  • Re: [Tagging] tagging "loose" paving stones Åbn
  • Re: [Tagging] tagging "loose" paving stones Anne-Karoline Distel via Tagging
  • Re: [Tagging] tagging "loose" paving stones Fernando Trebien
  • Re: [Tagging] tagging "loose" paving stones Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
  • Re: [Tagging] tagging "loose" paving stones Anne-Karoline Distel via Tagging
  • Re: [Tagging] tagging "loose" paving stones Yves via Tagging
  • Re: [Tagging] Re: tagging "loose" paving stones Anne- Karoline Distel via Tagging
  • Re: [Tagging] tagging "loose" paving stones Anne-Karoline Distel via Tagging
  • Re: [Tagging] tagging "loose" paving stones Yves via Tagging
  • Re: [Tagging] tagging "loose" paving stones Volker Schmidt
  • Re: [Tagging] tagging "loose" paving stones Yves via Tagging
  • Re: [Tagging] tagging "loose" paving stones Anne-Karoline Distel via Tagging
  • Re: [Tagging] tagging "loose" paving stones Warin
• [Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - Details of construction Ewrt1 OSM
• [Tagging] [RFC] traffic signs national id and human readable values (traffic_sign=* and traffic_sign:id=*) yo paseopor
  • [Tagging] Last week for [RFC] for traffic signs national id and human readable values (traffic_sign=* and traffic_sign:id=*) yo paseopor
• [Tagging] How to tag permanently/temporarily closed u-turn links on major roads? Julien Etienne
• [Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - Types of highway construction (2) Ewrt1 OSM
• [Tagging] [RFC] Barbers (hairdresser=barber) Nathan Case
  • Re: [Tagging] [RFC] Barbers (hairdresser=barber) Anne- Karoline Distel via Tagging
• [Tagging] Defibrillators Timothy Noname
  • Re: [Tagging] Defibrillators Graeme Fitzpatrick
  • Re: [Tagging] Defibrillators Timothy Noname
  • Re: [Tagging] Defibrillators _ _
• [Tagging] airport taqs Warin
  • Re: [Tagging] airport taqs LeTopographeFou
• [Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - Elevator dimensions Wieland Breitfeld
• [Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC - Documenting feet as an an optional elevation unit Minh Nguyen
  • Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC - Documenting feet as an an optional elevation unit Greg Troxel
  • Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC - Documenting feet as an an optional elevation unit Minh Nguyen
  • Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC - Documenting feet as an an optional elevation unit Greg Troxel
  • Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC - Documenting feet as an an optional elevation unit Brian M. Sperlongano
  • Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC - Documenting feet as an an optional elevation unit Minh Nguyen
  • Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC - Documenting feet as an an optional elevation unit Greg Troxel
  • Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC - Documenting feet as an an optional elevation unit Minh Nguyen
  • Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC - Documenting feet as an an optional elevation unit Philip Barnes
  • Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC - Documenting feet as an an optional elevation unit Peter Neale via Tagging
  • Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC - Documenting feet as an an optional elevation unit Warin
  • Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC - Documenting feet as an an optional elevation unit Greg Troxel
  • Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC - Documenting feet as an an optional elevation unit Kevin Kenny
  • Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC - Documenting feet as an an optional elevation unit Graeme Fitzpatrick
  • Re: [Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC - Documenting feet as an an optional elevation unit Jeremy Harris
• [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Menstrual products moanos
• [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Approved - emergency=disaster_response os-emmer
• [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Menstrual products moanos
  • Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Menstrual products moanos
• [Tagging] [Voting] Feature Proposal - emergency=disaster_response os-emmer
• [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Approved - Bicycle Wash mcliquid
• [Tagging] Liquidator store tagging Jherome Miguel
  • Re: [Tagging] Liquidator store tagging Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
  • Re: [Tagging] [talk-ca] Liquidator store tagging Jherome Miguel
• [Tagging] Call for Pictures Asa Hundert
• [Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - emergency=disaster_response os-emmer
• [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Key:tourism=camp_lodging Joel Christophel
• [Tagging] [Voting] Feature Proposal - Continuous crossings Alex
• [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Approved - Millstone Mitchel van Duuren
• [Tagging] [Voting] Feature Proposal - Bicycle Wash (amenity=bicycle_wash) mcliquid
• [Tagging] [Voting] Feature Proposal - GTFS Tagging standard Zoon van Michiel
  • Re: [Tagging] [Voting] Feature Proposal - GTFS Tagging standard Zoon van Michiel
  • [Tagging] [Voting] Feature Proposal - GTFS Tagging standard Zoon van Michiel

• Earlier messages
• Later messages