Try to address whatever reasons were given on the linked discussion
threads. Then create a new proposal by mentioning you have fixed all
said things, linking to the earlier proposal and then put it up for
another set of voting. It will converge over time, or lazy people will
start giving better reasoning. It will result in an improvement either
way.
On Sat, Nov 16, 2024 at 3:30 PM Illia Marchenko
<illiamarchenk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Sometimes people really votes for simular reasons ("this tag is used only *
> times"), that is against purpose of the proposal process (development and
> documenting of "the best practices"), approval of widely used tags is
> harmless, but give little benefits.
>
> Actually no way for nullification votes against, filled under strange or
> absurd reasons, except for voting by sock puppets.
>
> 16 Nov. 2024, 16:39 brecht devriese <brecht.devries...@gmail.com>:
>>
>> Hey,
>>
>> I ask myself the following question but do not immediately find an answer.
>> With a wiki proposal during voting, can one have an "I appose" vote
>> invalidated if no thorough reason is given ? Such as, for example, I oppose
>> this proposal. It makes no sense to "approve" this tag - it has never been
>> used. If someone wants to use this tag they can just use it; it does not
>> need "approval".
>>
>> If it is possible to invalidate an "I appose" vote, how do you do this?
>>
>> Thx
>>
>> Brecht
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
