I disagree because a flush median is still a median and I consider `flush_median` to be unnecessarily long, especially with the rule that a single carriageway is typically mapped as one way i.e. it should be a given that the median of a single carriageway is flush (I'd also point out that "divider" is equally misleading since it's intended for painted lines on OSM, not physical barriers — not that there aren't any mappers which have used these for regardless, though). I can, however, change the title to make it clear which type of median I actually mean.
-- Original-Nachricht -- Von: Greg Troxel <g...@lexort.com> Betreff: Re: [Tagging] Proposal - Median strip Datum: 15.02.2025, 01:57 Uhr An: Manuel B. <manuel.bin...@t-online.de> Cc: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools <tagging@openstreetmap.org> "Manuel B." <manuel.bin...@t-online.de> writes: > To avoid any sort of confusion out there: I'm specifically talking > about *flush* medians (one which can easily be repurposed into a > driving lane), not just the tagging of *any* highway median. Some Then maybe don't call your proposal or your tag "median"? _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
