To everyone who has the DDIWatch code you'll get more mileage by adding the
following in ddiwatch.cpp
void ReceiveArea(WPARAM wParam, LPARAM lParam, int& x, int& y, int& w, int&
h)
{
x = (wParam>>4) & 0x0FFF;
y = ((wParam & 0x000F)<<8) | ((lParam>>24) & 0x00FF);
w = ((lPar
I could be wrong, but the issue I had (I haven't tried with VNC yet) is
that the both were trying to plug in to the under lying layer of the screen
driver. This caused one of them to bomb out (normal the one installed
second) or sometimes in my case, a BOD happened
Remove the PCA software and
> For what it's worth, winddi.h and the other headers needed to make
> SetDDIHook work are from the 95/98 DDK, since this involves hooking calls
> destined for the device driver.
Aha. I wonder my Microsoft didn't tell me that when I asked? ;)
> Win2000 (and maybe ME?) uses DDML, the Display Dri
Gerald,
Not positive, but you might want to change your path variable to have
/usr/local/bin first instead of your user bin directory (or now that I think
of it, ./ should be first). Also, have you tried calling Xvnc explicitly IE
/usr/local/bin/Xvnc ?
-Dave
-Original Message-
From: [EM
This is the exact reason why I asked the original question. I am looking
at suporting (upto) 4 remote Win32 machines across a Internet
connection. I want a easy to deply single setup. At the moment, all the
Win32 FTP servers I have looked at (like Microsoft IIS and PWS) require
complex inst
>> Win2000 (and maybe ME?) uses DDML, the Display Driver Management Layer, at
>> least according to Beta 3 of the 2000DDK. I have been unable to download
>> the 67MB final DDK to see if it is present in the final release.
>
>It's a feature present in NT from SP3 and upwards, I think. It's little
Greetings -
I have been using VNC (as a serveice under NT) for
some time on a number of WindowsNT machines - both
workstation and server - and have noticed that
sometimes a machine will peg at 80 - 100% CPU with no
change until VNC is stopped and restarted. Then the
CPU will behave normally.
I
I, too, have this problem. I wish to restrict access to VNC to the adapter
on the 192.168.x.x network. Having read the documentation, I set the
registry keys shown below and stopped and restarted the VN service.
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\ORL\WinVNC3]
"AuthHosts"="-;+192.168"
[HKEY_CURRENT_USE
(soapbox on)
Why is discussion so adversarial. One class of users has a problem and keeps
posting requests. Another class of users desn't have that problem and
basically declares the first group to be stupid because they can't figure it
out.
Let me state my suspicion:
I think we have a UNIX gu
I guess that's all ya get with free software. Let's not forget the Windows
gurus. ;)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Morris, Steve
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 8:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: FTP Server
(soapbox on)
Why
The winvnc service was hung on one of the servers. This apparently
happened while one server was connected to another server causing both
servers to generate the problem. When I went on-site I found a message
on one say "connection closed", when I clicked OK, this one was then
accessible. I cou
there so many posts on this subject yesterday, this one was
either lost in the shuffle or most likely ignored. i still
think it has merit, so please pardon the reposting. i've
edited out most of the verbiage and just left the question.
but what about on the fly file xfers?
1. i sometimes hav
>RAdmin just uses the DDML system, which just passes all graphics calls to
>multiple graphics drivers, one of which is a hooking one.
Any ideas how RAdmin works under 95/98?
_ /"\
Mac Reiter\ /ASCII Ribbon Campaign
Nomadics, Inc.
Thanks for all your help guys. It seems I have some
hope to get this thing to work with even my feable
skills. But I have run into a snag.
My machines is NT @ work (behind the firewall) but the
other is at home running on Win 98. I realized quickly
that when I try to run nts on Win 98 it does not
I think you have to run the program as root.(There is something in the FAQ
on how to run as nonroot). In any case try running
Xvnc :
directly from the shell as a root.
-shashi
-Original Message-
From: Dave Drager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 4:35 AM
To: [
My beef is that Xvnc behaves much different than other X servers in how it
handles the startup script. Most X servers will read the .xinitrc file or
whatever startup file is specified and exit once the script exits. This
allows you to run the window manager (whether it's mwm, twm, CDE, VUE/RX,
GNO
For what it's worth:
I rather like the clipboard method of file transfer. Writing a simple pair
of "send" and "receive" programs to put files onto the clipboard in a
standard format and pick them back off would be useful in other situations,
wouldn't be overly complicated (UUencode could almost
As it turned out, the winvnc service was hung between two machines.
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Palm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 5:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: can no longer use vnc on some servers
I could be wrong, but the issue I had (I hav
Only for Windows users -- NetMeeting.
NetMeeting supports Remote Desktop Sharing. Also, as a conferencing
manager, NetMeeting supplies file transfer operations. It also supplies
audio and video communication, shared whiteboards, chat room, etc., which
may or may not be useful. NetMeeting also
Hmmm...I'm running vncserver as a non root user with
no extra steps. Wouldn't running as root be an
unwarranted extra security risk?
--- "Sharma, Shashi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I think you have to run the program as root.(There
> is something in the FAQ
> on how to run as nonroot). In any c
DDML is an NT technology, not a Win9x/ME one, I don't think.
James "Wez" Weatherall
--
"The path to enlightenment is /usr/bin/enlightenment"
Laboratory for Communications Engineering, Cambridge - Tel : 766513
AT&T Labs Cambridge, UK - Tel : 343000
- Ori
>I think we have a UNIX guru v.s Windoz end user split here.
I totally agree.
>I am a long time UNIX user/developer. I did a port of V7 UNIX to a 68000 in
>1981. I conceed UNIX guru standing to few people. In many ways my carreer
>has been data transfer. I could create a solution from scratch wi
At 10:46 AM 3/14/01 +0100, you wrote:
>To everyone who has the DDIWatch code you'll get more mileage by adding the
>following in ddiwatch.cpp
I wish to apologize to Mr. Adeney if the tone of my message offended. (the
term "bogus" is particularly regrettable...) I did not have the time to
proper
The same way as VNC, I assume, or possibly just simple polling. Last time I
looked, they were only faster than VNC under NT, so naturally that's all
you'll hear about... ;)
James "Wez" Weatherall
--
"The path to enlightenment is /usr/bin/enlightenment"
Laboratory for Communications Eng
It is a security risk but there is a way to run as nonroot. Its somewhere in
the FAQ.
-shashi
-Original Message-
From: Charles Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 7:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: problem with installation/use of vnc
Hmmm...I'm runn
I rather like the clipboard method of file transfer. Writing a simple pair
of "send" and "receive" programs to put files onto the clipboard in a
standard format and pick them back off would be useful in other situations,
wouldn't be overly complicated (UUencode could almost do the job) and would
>there so many posts on this subject yesterday, this one was
>either lost in the shuffle or most likely ignored. i still
>think it has merit, so please pardon the reposting. i've
>edited out most of the verbiage and just left the question.
>
>
>
>but what about on the fly file xfers?
>
>1. i som
well, that's fine for simple text, or i guess if u wanted to
use uuencode or even hex...but really that's hardly a robust
solution. i mean, sure it can be done, but i'd think it
would be easier to just split the file using a simple
utility and email the pieces.
my question was meant for large fo
mac, as one who keeps arguing for a solution to the file
xfer problem, i don't believe netmeeting offers a decent
solution. i believe it is using IRC to do the file xfer and
if so it is infinitely easier to just set aol IM or yahoo
messenger or even icq.
if it doesn't use IRC, then even with the
- Original Message -
From: "Jonathan Morton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 10:58 AM
Subject: Re: file xfer
> >there so many posts on this subject yesterday, this one
was
> >either lost in the shuffle or most likely ignored. i
still
> >think
I've been using VNC to access our Solaris servers with good success.
We have also used it to connect to Windows servers with slightly less
success. The problems are slower screen updates and screen artifacts left on
all clients (Solaris, Windows, MacOS). The artifacts are from the client n
A simple, one file at a time, binary file transfer would be a big leap
forward. There are times when I want a whole directory but mostly I just
want to edit locally that single word file or C file and then send it back.
The main reason I want to do that is because the cursor lag behind mouse
posit
I would go for that, too.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dries Feys
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 10:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: File Transfer
I rather like the clipboard method of file transfer. Writing a simple pair
Thanks Dave,
Now I am presented with the applet login. However, now when I login it
gives me the following error message:
com.ms.security.SecurityExceptionEx[rfbProto.]: cannot connect to
"10.1.0.15"
Here is the HTML code. Keep in mind that the this HTML file is on a
separate web server, which
At 03:56 PM 3/14/01 -, you wrote:
>The same way as VNC, I assume, or possibly just simple polling. Last time I
>looked, they were only faster than VNC under NT, so naturally that's all
>you'll hear about... ;)
RAdmin 2.0 and Remote-Anything 3.5 are both substantially faster than VNC
under Wi
In fact, I've transfered *binary* files this way (to/from Unix systems, mind,
no
Winders anywhere in sight). I'm not sure what restrictions Winders puts on
the clipboard, if any, but there is very little restriction put on it in X.
I used a modified version of the 'xselection' program for X that
HI, there,
I downloaded Windows CE client source code, and migrated the project to
Microsoft Embedded Visual C++ 3.0.
I successfully compiled SH3 release, MIPS release and ARM release by making
some modifications both to the source codes and to compiler/linker settings:
1. The source code used
I'd expect you too see some minor glitches wih WinVNC server under Win2K but
seeing display glitches when viewing VNC servers running on Unix is very odd
indeed. Have you tried rebuilding the binaries from source?
Cheers,
James "Wez" Weatherall
--
"The path to enlightenment is /usr/bi
> In fact, I've transfered *binary* files this way (to/from Unix systems,
mind,
> no
> Winders anywhere in sight). I'm not sure what restrictions Winders puts on
> the clipboard, if any, but there is very little restriction put on it in
X.
This is unsafe in general, since between Unxi and Windows
Hello Steve Waltner,
The following xstartup is what I use to terminate Xvnc when I exit out from any
Window Manager. Works great for me. Hope VNC could implantment this on the
next release.
--- xstartup
#!/bin/sh
xrdb $HOME/.Xresources
xsetroot -solid grey
twm
# When twm exit or any WM exit,
At 11:04 AM 3/14/01 -0500, you wrote:
>mac, as one who keeps arguing for a solution to the file
>xfer problem, i don't believe netmeeting offers a decent
>solution. i believe it is using IRC to do the file xfer and
>if so it is infinitely easier to just set aol IM or yahoo
>messenger or even icq.
yes, but for that it's so simple to just email the word doc
back and forth...
- Original Message -
From: "Morris, Steve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 12:02 PM
Subject: RE: File Transfer
> A simple, one file at a time, binary file transfer
I've had the same thing happen on 1 of 2 Windows 2000 computers. One is perfectly
fine and doesn't do that when I VNC into it. The other always leaves artifacts. Like
the screen lock. after I input my password to unlock the computer, the desktop comes
up with the icons and taskbar, but the
At 12:02 PM 3/14/01 -0500, you wrote:
>A simple, one file at a time, binary file transfer would be a big leap
>forward. There are times when I want a whole directory but mostly I just
>want to edit locally that single word file or C file and then send it back.
>The main reason I want to do that is
"Kevin M. Hilscher" wrote:
>
> Thanks Dave,
>
> Now I am presented with the applet login. However, now when I login it
> gives me the following error message:
>
> com.ms.security.SecurityExceptionEx[rfbProto.]: cannot connect to
> "10.1.0.15"
>
> Here is the HTML code. Keep in mind that the th
On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 11:19:53AM -0600, Mac Reiter wrote:
> You might also look at http://www.tridia.vnc That site is more actively
(That's www.tridiavnc.com.)
> engaged in support for the professional remote-control industry. As an
> example, they now have VNC remote control of the Linux T
>it up? Doubt it. Is there a free, easy-to-use Windows FTP server, along
>the lines of NetPresenz for the Mac? Again, doubt it. BTW, even
>NetPresenz is shareware.
>- --
>from: Jonathan "Chromatix" Morton
>mail: [EMAIL PROTECT
>void ReceiveArea(WPARAM wParam, LPARAM lParam, int& x, int& y, int& w, int&
>h)
>{
> x = (wParam>>4) & 0x0FFF;
> y = ((wParam & 0x000F)<<8) | ((lParam>>24) & 0x00FF);
> w = ((lParam>>12) & 0x0FFF);
> h = lParam & 0x0FFF;
>}
>
>and in 'DdiDlgProc(HWND hdlg, UINT uMsg, WPARA
>forward. There are times when I want a whole directory but mostly I just
For those times, you'd probably be better off to zip the directory anyway,
which would then result in a single-file transfer.
Dave
-
To unsubscribe, send
Kevin,
I'm not positive but I'm pretty sure that VNC doesn't let you log in to a
server at another IP address. You must serve the page on the computer where
VNC is running. However, don't forget VNC is totally open source. I'm sure
it would be possible to code it so that isn't the case. It would
>> You might also look at http://www.tridia.vnc That site is more actively
>
>(That's www.tridiavnc.com.)
Oops. Thanks.
>> engaged in support for the professional remote-control industry. As an
>> example, they now have VNC remote control of the Linux TEXT mode console.
>
>Um. That's intere
Is this discussion getting past the initial basic requirement of
cross-platform bidirectional file transfer capability ?
Someone yesterday mentioned clipboard based transfers, which is trivial for
small and viewable, thus clip-able based files. I too use this method
exte
On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 11:50:27AM -0600, Mac Reiter wrote:
> It's the Beta 2.0 version. The download link is on the righthand side,
> down roughly one screen, on the homepage. Haven't played with it myself.
> I think it is meant to grab /dev/console, and allow control of things that
> normally
Raji:
Hello! So if I recall the situation correctly...your
workplace firewall only allows a handful of 'standard' ports
thru, like HTTP and FTP, and not something like VNC. You've
an NT machine behind this firewall at work, and want to VNC
to your home Win98 machine that's using an always-
Hi.
Can some one show me how to install VNC on i386 Solaris platform? Thank
you.
Phu
-
To unsubscribe, send a message with the line: unsubscribe vnc-list
to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
See also: http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/intouc
Dave Drager wrote:
>
> Kevin,
>
> I'm not positive but I'm pretty sure that VNC doesn't let you log in to a
> server at another IP address.
But it does! That's what it's all about;-)
> You must serve the page on the computer where
> VNC is running.
No you don't. You must however host the appl
Hi.
Can some one show me how to install VNC on "i386 Solaris" platform? I
couldn't find the manual on line, it took me a day; but no thing done :(.
Thank you.
Phu
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 13
- Original Message -
From: "Mac Reiter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 12:19 PM
Subject: Re: FTP SOLUTION!
> At 11:04 AM 3/14/01 -0500, you wrote:
> >mac, as one who keeps arguing for a solution to the file
> >xfer problem, i don't believe net
well
as with all ftp recs, does anyone have a clue about the
security issues with this one? meaning for all the reasons
people say 'don't use ftp' why should we use this one?
- Original Message -
From: "Steven Vallarian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTE
remember;
Windows; a 32 bit operating environment built on a 16 bit operating system
for an 8 bit processor by a 2 bit company
Or something like that
-Original Message-
From: Mac Reiter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 9:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE:
To the users who only want a program (or pair of programs) rather than a
protocol extension:
Would a Visual Basic application be acceptable? If no external controls
are used, the only requirement for running the app would be MSVBVM60.dll,
which is installed by any VB6 app. The app itself would
How I can hide the VNC tray icon ???
Please .. help me!
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices.
http://auctions.yahoo.com/
-
To unsubscribe,
Last time I checked, Tridia was just duping this mailing list.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tim Waugh
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 12:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FTP SOLUTION!
On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 11:19:53AM -0600,
as for a-ftp, i'll direct u to:
http://www.securiteam.com/exploits/SoftHead_A-FTP_vulnerable
_to_DoS_attack.html
as well as:
http://www.bookcase.com/library/software/msdos.network.undef
.html
which slams the program w/o any supporting documentation
- Original Message -
From: "Steven V
As I pointed out in a earlier message, X does support it, so Unix-to-Unix is
no problem.
Unfortunately, as Wez pointed out, it won't work cross-platform; when moving
between Winders and X, VNC does line end translations (Winders: CR LF v.s.
Unix LF). Presumably the Mac server/viewer does the same
I've asked this before but no one responded. Is there a way in VNC to
prevent another person from logging on and killing your session?
Please respond. Thanks
Zmer Andranigian
Systems Administrator
213-599-4117 (w)
800-471-4035 (p)
-
>>I really wish when Microsoft made a 32 bit operating system it would use 32
>>bit components...
>remember;
>Windows; a 32 bit operating environment built on a 16 bit operating system
>for an 8 bit processor by a 2 bit company
>Or something like that
"A 32-bit extension to a 16-bit graphical s
For Windows, look at http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/winvnc.html under
"Connect Priority". I don't know about other platforms.
Dave Habermann
-Original Message-
From: Zmer Andranigian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 2:46 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject:
from the secret journal of Zmer Andranigian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I've asked this before but no one responded. Is there a way in VNC to
> prevent another person from logging on and killing your session?
>
> Please respond. Thanks
the other client must request a shared session.
--
Jacob Kuntz
Angus Macleod wrote:
>
> I, too, have this problem. I wish to restrict access to VNC to the adapter
> on the 192.168.x.x network. Having read the documentation, I set the
> registry keys shown below and stopped and restarted the VN service.
>
> [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\ORL\WinVNC3]
> "AuthHo
"Sharma, Shashi" wrote:
[snip]
> I think the unsafe part of the ftp is that it uses two different ports and
> by default one is outbound and the other is inbound. Port 21 is used for
> sending ftp commands and the other port(20 by default) is used for actual
> data. All client I have seen changes
"S.C.Best" wrote:
>
> Raji:
> Hello! So if I recall the situation correctly...your
> workplace firewall only allows a handful of 'standard' ports
> thru, like HTTP and FTP, and not something like VNC.
>You've
> an NT machine behind this firewall at work, and want to VNC
> to your home Wi
On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Bryan A. Pendleton wrote:
> [snip]
> But, from the #2
> perspective, you've got a custom session running, which is started by the
> user, runs everything as the user, can only do things the user is allowed
> to do, etc. This is how the unix side of VNC has been implemented
On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Steve Bostedor wrote:
> No one was asking for a SMTP, IRC, gopher, . . .
Correction, no one asked for it yet, but then I'm sure at the begginning
of the VNC project no one asked for FTP.
> Who cares about a single diskette? Isn't your pocket big enough for tw
Kevin:
Hello! Quick thought, perhaps it's nothing:
> Now I am presented with the applet login. However, now when I
> login it gives me the following error message:
>
> com.ms.security.SecurityExceptionEx[rfbProto.]: cannot connect to
> "10.1.0.15"
>
> Here is the HTML code. Keep in min
: "Morris, Steve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: Why is discussion so adversarial. One class of users has a problem
: and keeps posting requests. Another class of users desn't have that
: problem and basically declares the first group to be stupid because
: they can't figure it out.
Well I certainly ap
Harmen:
Heya. Some quick comments:
> I don't see how having another machine at a home-LAN would help,
> and why Win98 can't do network tricks (although I have no experience
> with it 98).
My experience with making Win98 do networking tricks is
about as vast. Though my
Got it working - here's the code:
http://10.1.0.15:5800"
WIDTH=800 HEIGHT=600>
Thanks all!
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dave Drager
Sent: March 14, 2001 10:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTEC
I have been having problems in a W2K environment sending the "ctl-alt-del"
sequence from the drop-down menu. Nothing seems to happen. No firewall
issue, as far as I have been able to deduce. Has anyone else ran into a
similar problem with W2K (Workstation to server, or workstation to
workstatio
I want to rewind a little.
In the his post [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] made a proposal that could the
the good enough solution many of us could live with. He made several
suggestions but the one I liked best requires a utility on the server side
and a utility on the client side. One utility reads
: Jonathan Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: The same goes for file transfer - and by that I mean across the Internet.
: Putting security concerns aside for a moment, I can run a freeware FTP
: server and/or client on my Mac with a reasonable amount of ease. However,
: these Macs are behind a double-f
: Grant McDorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: If we decide on a way of handling the "line end" in binary, I can put
: together an X application to handle it.
I would suggest using pkzip format to handle multiple files
(and compression), and MIME encapsulation to describe the
content format and provide
: David Rothman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: my thinking is that since there isn't (at least no one in multiple
: forums or newsgroups has truly answered the question) a simple
: standalone utility to effectuate simple, secure 2 way file
: transmission in windows (IRC,FTP - not safe. SSH,FTP - need to s
Ok, from now on, only those who would have something to do with the
development of such a feature in VNC need reply. I can't stop you, I'm just
suggesting that there is no need for you to. We've all heard that a bunch
of people want it and a few people don't (for reasons that don't hold
water)
While I sympathize with the group that is for including ftp capability it is
entirely non-trivial. I spent many years moving data around from machine to
machine and I concur with Steve Morris (from soapbox below). I have always
had an ftp server running on at least one side of the transfer so ru
On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, Jonathan Morton wrote:
> Well put. I haven't even been able to *find* a workable, free SSH or SCP
> implementation for my Macs, let alone figure out how to use it.
http://www.macssh.com/
> The same goes for file transfer - and by that I mean across the Internet.
> Putting
yeah, thats the one. ok, copying it down.
the 8080 and 8086 were both 16bit registers (I guess that means 16bit
internals), but intel had to make the 8080 for IBM because they wanted a
8bit interface. I always thought dos 2.x was 16bit, but not sure.
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Mort
https servers would be a solution except that (in the
windows world) u have to set it up and that's not trivial.
- Original Message -
From: "Wayne Throop" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 5:20 PM
Subject: Re: file xfer
how well do u think cut and paste will work for a 1,2 or 10
gb file?
why bother continuing with the cut and paste idea when u can
simply email smaller files? and for slightly larger than
small files, u can (with a utility) split the file and email
the pieces. this is surely simpler than uuencod
On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, Dries Feys wrote:
> That was my idea too... I think this it pretty easy to implement. A file
> picker (open file dialog) on the server side to choose a file, which is
> uuencoded, and then after the clipboard transfer (or a similar system) a
> save file dialog on the client
>I want to rewind a little.
>
>In the his post [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] made a proposal that could the
>the good enough solution many of us could live with. He made several
>suggestions but the one I liked best requires a utility on the server side
>and a utility on the client side. One utility
Just for that, I'll chime in. The reasons I wouldn't want such
a feature are creeping bloat and creeping bugs. If you are on
the 'net (required for VNC, right?) then you already have the
ability to run FTP or any number of other file transfer progs,
on any real computer system, anyway.
I don't
>Those double firewalls deny common file transfer mechanisms for a
>reason. I have to side with you network administrator on this.
Actually, the firewall denies very little per se. It's a double-NAT
firewall. The Mac which I want to connect on is on 192.168.*, behind a NAT
gateway which interf
>I'd still suggest an http-based (maybe with java) solution,
>which would be easily runnable on a web server visible to both
>ends of the file transfer.
Who provides this HTTP server? Is it built into the VNC server or client -
or both? One can't expect everyone to have webspace which they can
Hi.
I ran into a problem on i386 Solaris O/S when I try to start "vncserver".
The out put look like this: vncpasswd: syntax error at line 1: `('
unexpected
Have any one of you know how to correction this error? I'm appreciate for
you help.
Phu
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Thanks for your comments, but the approach seems a bit heavy handed (and
expensive) when VNC seems to have a built in mechanism that I can't get to
work (because, I assume, I am doing it wrong).
Anyone else know how to make this work?
TIA, Angus.
- Original Message -
From: "Neil J Pilgr
One problem with BO2K is that virus checkers claim it as a virus.
At 06:35 PM 13/03/2001 +0100, Gustafsson, Bjorn wrote:
>Actually, I tried BO2k before I tried VNC, and no, VNC is much easier to
>use.
>BO2k gives you better control over some things (namely running processes),
>but VNC is better w
Is it possible to send function key strokes to the server I'm using
win98se; the servers are win98se and win95.
Thanks Gary Lee
Gary Lee Radcliff
11780 92nd St No
Largo, FL 22773
Voice 727 392 2787
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Include on no mailing
or phone lists.
-
Jonathan Morton wrote:
>
> Consider the scenario where a VNC user sets up a fiendishly complicated
> tunnel system to get his VNC client to connect to his server, but then he
> wants to do some file transfer. If the HTTP server is built into the
> server (and there is usually already one present
VNC documents state that it would not work with a MSDOS prompt at full screen
mode. However, my application requires it ... is there a patch that someone
knows to get around this?
Also, I installed the viewer from conduits.com onto the iPAQ and I get a
quick message flash when I attempt to conne
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
