[SAtalk] understanding header

own. ? Eric --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists

[SAtalk] Funky subject line

g00d dTbt c0ns0lidati0n pr0graAm what would catch the subject line as shown above Eric --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US

[SAtalk] funky subject

support issue numbering in a subject. any comments? Eric Nyre Computer Systems Administrator Kier Construction, Kier Management, Kier Corporation http://www.kiercorp.com/ The opinions and/or expressions contained in the adjoined communication are strictly those of the individual conveying the

[SAtalk] spamd processing time excessive

most of my emails process by spamd under a second but some are taking 150 seconds what would cause this. the box is only used for email. thanks for any input --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net

Re: [SAtalk] spamd processing time excessive

what is typical in your maillog? --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://

[SAtalk] maillog 153 Seconds

What would cause spam to be identified (as shown in maillog) in 153 seconds most spam are detected under 1 second ? --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it h

[SAtalk] required hits setup

. I need to change the global required_hits Linux rh 8, spamassassin current version       Eric   The opinions and/or expressions contained in the adjoined communication are strictly those of the individual conveying the communication and may or may not be those of The Kier Companies.

[SAtalk] can I run a file (mail folder) through SA after the fact

I stopped the spamd and didn't restart it . over night of course spam came in.  Can I run spamassassin on the mail folder  (file) /var/spool/mail/myfolder somehow to manually filter it. now that its already passed through procmail and missed the sleeping spamd ?       Eric The opi

[SAtalk] (no subject)

when I try to install digest-sha1 I am getting errors. What is the best way to install digest::sha1 from cpan it hangs on ftp from source it wont pass the tests 1/16 failed Eric --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware With

[SAtalk] Country codes

What are you doing for country codes? If I want to mark all mail from junkmail.com.tw or junkmail.com.au what would be the best way to trap all the country codes? should I OR it ie from ~= {\.com\.au|\.com\.tw| etc |etc} or is there a better way Thanks -

[SAtalk] Re: spamassassin on Gateway server (MX)

postfix/smtpd[18786]: disconnect from unknown[64.191.76.56] -- Eric Sorenson - Systems / Network Administrator, MIS - Transmeta Corporation --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integ

[SAtalk] Re: user_prefs on a gateway machine

y mitigated with a spamtrap address for Bayes training, reasonable threshold defaults, and user education (ie. show them how to whitelist spam-ish newsletters that they actually want in their clients) -- Eric Sorenson - Systems / Network Administrator, MIS - Transmeta Corporation --

[SAtalk] Re: Per-user exceptions

header. Then users can opt in by setting up client filtering rules to match on the 'X-Spam-Flag: YES' header. (Unless Outlook doesn't let you match on arbitrary header fields in which case the opt-out guy is out of luck.) -- Eric Soren

[SAtalk] Forward mail to a specific mailbox

up line for the out of office users).   Thank you,   Eric  

[SAtalk] Installation problem

I did a simple install of Spam Assassin today using the make install method as follows: perl Makefile.PL make make install When I test my setup with: spamassassin -t < sample-nonspam.txt > nonspam.out spamassassin -t < sample-spam.txt > spam.out it produces the .out files like it should but I

RE: [SAtalk] Installation problem

nd with luck it might fix my problem but if anybody has other ideas I'd be happy to hear them. -Original Message- From: Craig Hughes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 1:57 PM To: Woodworth, Eric Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Install

[SAtalk] Can't seem to get Spamassassin to work properly

Here's my setup: I have a vanilla install of Red Hat linux running a fairly plain Intel server. I have Q-mail, Q-mail Scanner, and Sophos AV running. All 3 of these worked fine before trying to install Spamassassin. When I install SA downloaded 2.01 and used the perl makefile to do the install.

RE: [SAtalk] Has anybody gotten SA to work with Qmail and Qmail s canner?

seen other people with posts like mine on the qmail-scanner mail list so I know I'm not alone. -Original Message- From: Dallas Engelken To: Woodworth, Eric Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 2/11/02 8:14 PM Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Has anybody gotten SA to work with Qmail and Qmail s canner? > W

RE: [SAtalk] Has anybody gotten SA to work with Qmail and Qmail s canner?

g -u root a bad thing in any way? -Original Message- From: Dallas Engelken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 10:17 AM To: Woodworth, Eric Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Has anybody gotten SA to work with Qmail and Qmail s canner? > Well in my insta

[SAtalk] Non-english spam

Anybody have any rules to stop Portuguese spam?:) Seems somebody in my company gets pounded with Brazilian spam. I could probably fashion something myself, but if somebody has something premade that'd be great. Anybody else have a problem with non-english spam? Thanks in advance for any he

[SAtalk] question about the HTTP_CTRL_CHARS_HOST rule please

Hi all! Ok, so I figured out exactly what this rule was doing (nice refresher on reg ex, which I needed anyway) but I have a question. Why is using control code evidence of spam? Especially because this rule gives 4 points, so it seems like it's considered pretty heavy evidence of spam

[SAtalk] SA doesn't see everything in local.cf

Hmmm, I already sent this to the list but I dont see it in there so I guess I'll try 1 more time. Sorry if this shows twice. I have 3 e-mail boxes all configured exactly the same with qmail, qmail-scanner, and SA. The boxes work fine all things considered but I do have 1 problem. On 2 of my b

[SAtalk] SA doesn't see everything in local.cf

I have 3 e-mail boxes all configured exactly the same with qmail, qmail-scanner, and SA. The boxes work fine all things considered but I do have 1 problem. On 2 of my boxes, when I edit local.cf and change required_hits to 7, it doesn't take. When I check my spam reports it still tells me that

RE: [SAtalk] SA doesn't see everything in local.cf

suggestion. Thanks for the help. -Original Message- From: Greg Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 8:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SAtalk] SA doesn't see everything in local.cf On 27 February 2002, Woodworth, Eric said: > On 2 of my boxes, wh

RE: [SAtalk] Why am I having so many problems..spamc not working

I also have to run spamc with the -u flag to get it to work. I use "-u root". If I didn't add the -u root it would run as the user qmailq and fail every time. At the time I made the change people on this list told me I was wrong, but I'm certain that it fixed my problem. If I remove it, spamc

[SAtalk] floating point math formatting

I'm seeing some floating point rounding errors (examples below). I think it isn't really an error -- just an artifact of IEEE floating point math. It might look better with some sort of sprintf formatting to something like %6.4f or similar. eric SPAM: Content analys

Re: [SAtalk] floating point math formatting

Think the core processing needs to stick with standard floating point (especially for auto-whitelist). Perhaps just the report formatting of the output could be 'cleaned' up a little bit. eric Vivek Khera wrote: > > >>>>> "EW" == Eric Whiting <[E

[SAtalk] [Statistics]

Helps ? Thanks, -- Vielet Eric | CRIHAN Phone : 02 32 91 42 91 | Technopôle du Madrillet Fax : 02 32 91 42 92 | 745, avenue de l'Université E-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 76800 Saint-Étienne du Rouvray, France __

[SAtalk] Dumping email with spamass-milter

Is there a way to dump all "spam" email to a file or redirect it to another user account? I am using the latest spamass-milter for spamassassin. Before I can implement this company wide, we want to be able to see how much real mail is lost. TIA Eric Six [EMAIL

[SAtalk] spamassassin --report

still don't get detected as spam ? And are the pyzor / razor / dcc checks performed on all messages ? How do I know if these checks were done ? Best regards, Eric Veltman --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites inclu

Re: [SAtalk] Running sa-learn on multiple mboxes

exec sa-learn --ham --mbox {} \; sa-learn --spam --mbox /home/someuser/mail/spam/definitely_spam Best regards, Eric Veltman --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums a

Re: [SAtalk] spamassassin --report

e. I don't trust my own RPM packaging skills enough to publish them, but they seem to work, I'll see how much spam will evade the filters now. Best regards, Eric --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites inclu

[SAtalk] Testing and weighting rules against corpus of spam/non-spam

they running these tests? 2. I would like to run my entire rulebase against a ham/spam corpus, and arrive at statistically "best" weighting of rules. How is this done? Cordially, Eric hart ehart [nospam] npi.net === All NPI email scanned for spam and viruses by SpamRejector(tm). SpamRejector.net ===

[SAtalk] More complex rules

t's mail name ("ehart" for example). It would then test the subject field to see if this stored mail name is contained in the subject. Any help appreciated! Cordially, Eric -- Eric Hart Network Performance, Inc. (NPI) ehart

re[2]: [SAtalk] More complex rules

question is, *can* I use storage here? How is it done? As to the eval rules, I've seen some mention of them elsewhere, and will give it a try. Thanks again, Eric > At 01:48 AM 8/18/03 -0400, Eric Hart wrote: >1. I want to find a string that matches on the regular >expression /

[SAtalk] SA & MySQL Setup Question

even with all of the DB settings done in local.cf when I watch spam -D output I never see it trying to talk to my database. Is there something else I can look at to see what I have done wrong? -- Eric Ochoa ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.g

Re: [SAtalk] reporting

ry with automatically generated user ID / password by using 'razor-admin -create' under the same user ID that you also use for 'spamassassin -r'. Best regards, Eric Veltman --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware

[SAtalk] A problem and a general question for SpamAssassin

ilter/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/W: lock failed: File exists Cannot open bayes databases /var/spool/filter/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/W: lock failed: File exists Also, is there a way for spamd to parse an HTML document for bad things but not muck with HREF and IMG tags? Thanks, Eric McDonald Systems Admin,

[SAtalk] A problem and a general question for SpamAssassin

amAssassin::Conf' for details of what can be # tweaked. # ### # #rewrite_subject 0 #report_safe 1 required_hits 7.0 skip_rbl_checks 1 use_bayes 0 Thanks! Eric -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric McDonald Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 11:20 AM To:

[SAtalk] spamass & spamass-milter logfile errors

I'm fairly new to SA and I'm also fairly confused There's a couple of issues that I need help with, based on what I'm seeing in the logs. I think they're all related: 1. "Still running as root" 2. cannot write to ~/.spamassassin/bayes_journal 3. bayes expire_old_tokens: lock:490 cannot creat

[SAtalk] How does a message like this get through?

be appreciated. Thanks, Eric Vollmer Received: from sav2.domain.com [10.1.8.98] by GW_M1.domain.com; Wed, 08 Oct 2003 21:57:17 -0400 Received: from mail2.domain.com ([xx.xx.xx.xx])  by sav2.domain.com (SAVSMTP 3.1.2.35) with SMTP id M2003100822111016948  for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed,

Re: [SAtalk] spamd and user_prefs

Mine was the original question, and I was able to get spamc / spamd to use individual ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs files. I think the only trick is to make sure you call spamc as the user who owns ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs. I don't know enough about your setup to know if that is the case. - Or

[SAtalk] mail forwarding loop with lists

*know* it must work because SA, postfix, and mailman are all popular enough for someone else to have encountered a similar situation. Again, sorry about the OT post and thanks to anyone who can help in advance. -- Eric Sammer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.bluemonkeystuff.com developer /

[SAtalk] Whitelisting mail server by ip or hostname

x27;t scan mail from *.corp.com # score CORP_SERVER_WHITELISTED -100 Regards, Eric Bellotti --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features you'

[SAtalk] RE:

Is this spamassassin doing this or is there a something wrong with sendmail? I am running spamass-milter with 8.9.12 sendmail... anyone having a problem? 70% of messages are getting re-written with this.. Eric S!x [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Specialist Sirsi Corporation

[SAtalk] merging bayes, auto white/black list info between servers

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello list! I am running SA 2.53 on a few servers, two load balanced primary servers (equal precedence mx record) and two failover servers. There servers are running spamd/qmail-spamc. How do I get the primary servers to periodically merge their aut

[SAtalk] Qmail-scanner and SA, scanning question

Hey all,   I would like to be able to Use Qmail Scanner and SA to tag spam and then be able to filter mail based on the X-Spam Level – not just whether it’s spam or not but actually by the hit points. Thus some mail (say between 5.0 and 8.0 hits) still goes to the normal inbox and tagged

[SAtalk] Spamassassin Report generation??

clamav for virus filtering. So far this configuration with postfix has worked well with 300 users. Eric --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now

[SAtalk] redirecting spam to a script

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello. I'm trying to set this up, and I'm just not quite getting it... Here's what I have: I am running qmail as an MTA, with spamassassin (qmail-spamc and spamd, sitewide) This is a scanning only relay box (no local accounts). I want to write a wra

[SAtalk] Failed to run BAYES_*

New to Spam Assassin...new install..anybody know how to make this go away..feel free to embarrass me. Running spamd with auto-learn enabled. Jul 15 09:56:25 maverix1 spamd[29552]: Failed to run BAYES_10 SpamAssassin test, skipping: ^I(gdbm store returned -1, errno 0, key "^M^A^G^I^CRUNNINGEXPIRE

RE: [SAtalk] Failed to run BAYES_*

Theo, I suspect that you understand what wrong with my setup..could you point me in a more obvious direction? > -Original Message- > From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 10:59 AM > To: Eric Dean > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Su

[SAtalk] Information on writing rules

RL IF expressions in SA rules. CF processing algorithm Thanks! - Eric -- Eric Hart Network Performance, Inc. (NPI) ehart <&

re[2]: [SAtalk] Information on writing rules

> Good afternoon, Eric, Hi Eric! On Mon, 21 Jul 2003, Eric Hart wrote: > I've been writing custom SA rules for awhile, and have a pretty good > grasp now on regular expresssions and BODY and HEADER rules. Search as > I might, I have not found sources of information on advan

[SAtalk] Upgrade 2.41?

ether to wait. -- Regards, Eric Mings --- Sponsored by: AMD - Your access to the experts on Hammer Technology! Open Source & Linux Developers, register now for the AMD Developer Symposium. Code: EX8664 http://www.developwithamd.com/dev

[SAtalk] 2.42 release date?

I am a little reluctant to upgrade to 2.41 since it appears that 2.42 may be in the wings. Any idea how long before this becomes available for upgrade? Thanks much! -- Regards, Eric Mings --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek

[SAtalk] Make test failure on Solaris 8...

ldren.ok 31/33Terminated make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 143 Terminated Any ideas on how to resolve this? Eric S!x[EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Specialist Sirsi Corporation +1.800.372.8527 +1.314.432.1100.356 --- T

Re: [SAtalk] disable razor2?

hat I don't want to use? It is not only I want a score of zero, but I don't want resources spent checking rbl's that don't interest me. Thanks much. -- Regards, Eric Mings --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:Thi

[SAtalk] 2.4x seems much improved

I had been using it previously with very little problem on another system. I can only go by results. Thanks much to the team members! -- Regards, Eric Mings Ph.D. --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: viaVerio will pay you up to $1,000 for

[SAtalk] rbl checks appear to not be working

e for suggestions. -- Regards, Eric Mings --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;4729346;7592162;s?http://www.su

[SAtalk] Listbuilder rule?

spam. -- Regards, Eric Mings Ph.D. --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[SAtalk] Problem with SpamAssassin and SQL setup.

eference, value from userpref where username = '%username%' OR username = 'GLOBAL' ERROR: Relation "userpref" does not exist -- Eric Renfro Myrddin Computers & Designs - CEO/President --- This sf.net email

RE: [SAtalk] Sitewide use of spamassassin

Actually every user does have a Unix account, but it is separate from the mail server. They are in the process of changing the whole email architecture to be a 16-node Linux cluster right now. Should be interesting to see how it all works out. -Eric --On Saturday, October 19, 2002 4:57 PM

[SAtalk] removing markup from a whole mbox?

Hi, I see that spamassassin -d will remove markup from a single message, but is there a good way to remove spamassassin markup from an entire mbox? Thanks, -Eric --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http

[SAtalk] Re: Spamassassin-talk digest, Vol 1 #811 - 12 msgs

Sorry to hear the news. I guess I need to get a backup in place for my maxtor. eric Scott Serr wrote: > > I woke up this morning, brushed my teeth and went to run something on my > home computer. There was this aweful noise. I moved my case to open it > (while it was still runni

[SAtalk] runaway spamd, process relicating...

I am running the CVS 2.50 SpamAssassin from 2 days ago   When I run the command /etc/init.d/spamassassin restart spamd begins to accumulate in the process list.  When I check the mail error log, I see:   spamc[21775]: connect() to spamd at 127.0.0.1 failed, retrying (1/3): Connect

Re: [SAtalk] spamassassin / postfix: messages stuck in maildrop

ivery processes running. A process restart is required. I haven't had the time to run the bug down -- and with .13 running fine for me, I'll likely just stay there. =eric - Original Message - From: "News" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent

[SAtalk] bigevil.cf

According to what I have read, all you have to do is drop bigevil.cf into /etc/mail/spamassassin and restart spamd. Is that correct or do I need to make any configuration changes to tell SA to use this cf file? TIA Eric --- This SF.net

Re: [SAtalk] Tripwire breaking exim/spamd setup

How hard would it be to set an upper limit in SA when writing rule hits as headers? Zarjazz wrote: Well it had to happen, I've been recieving some spam that triggered LOTS of tripwire rules and overflowing the smtp daemon header buffer. Extracts from exim panic log below. 2004-01-16 13:17:08 1Ah

Re: [SAtalk] fresh installation not working (yp_match: clnt_call: RPC: timed out)

I believe you have neglected to hook SA into your mail delivery path. There are a number of ways to do this; but the most straight forward is to use procmail and add a .forward and a .procmailrc file into your home directory. Fernan Aguero wrote: Hi, I just installed SpamAssassin-2.6.1 under

Re: [SAtalk] Making SA on Windows with Perl 5.8.2

Sorry, thot we were using 5.8.2. However, after checking more closely: perl 5.8.1 SA 2.62 FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE Works well. Bret Miller wrote: Has anyone successfully made SA on Windows with Perl 5.8.2? I finally gave up on it and went back to Perl 5.6.1. Any suggestions? Bret ---

[SAtalk] looking for positive effects, pgp signatures?

[THIS LIST HAS MOVED! see http://useast.spamassassin.org/lists.html .]I have a customer using a Verizon DSL which automatically scores a number of hits from the dynamic IP RBL's. We all understand the impossibility of changing Verizon's lax enforcement policies; but I'm hoping there might be a

[SAtalk] more razor problems

19, protocol version 2. debug: 121591 seconds before closest server discovery debug: Agent terminated razor-report failed: Permission denied undefined Razor::Client and I'm not sure what to do because: [esj@harvee esj]$ perl -MRazor::Client -e 'pri

Solution: Re: [SAtalk] more razor problems

At 06:09 PM 4/2/2002 -0500, Eric S. Johansson wrote: >I didn't see the warnings about 1.20 razor in time and now I am well and >truly hosed. I installed 1.19 over 1.20 (never did figure how to >uninstall perl-hairballs) and now I get.. > >[esj@harvee esj]$ cat IMap/00mis

[SAtalk] Another auto-whitelist problem

s to solutions would be greatly appreciated. I'm currently running with auto white list turned off in order to garner the other benefits of spamassassin. ---eric debug: running header regexp tests; score so far=0 debug: running body-text per-line regexp tests; score so far=0 debug: runnin

Re: [SAtalk] I am so happy, I could kiss you...

;t work well because they handle e-mail either too late or too early for camram. so, any ideas would be welcome. ---eric ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

[SAtalk] Magnitude of problem

I'm trying to get some numbers on number of pieces of spam, numbers of spammers, etc.. Are there any good references I could use? ---eric ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamass

Re: [SAtalk] Porn mail deleting for school

t offers porn filtering for email. > > Maybe you'll MS> feel differently about that too? > > > > Burn him! Burn him! > >He's a witch! He turned me into a newt. --- eric (I got better) ___ Spamassassin-talk maili

Re: [SAtalk] false positive

At 02:56 PM 4/21/2002 +0200, Klaus Heinz wrote: >Or is a threshold of 5 too low ? What do other people use ? I typically use 8 to 9 --- eric ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listi

RE: [SAtalk] Magnitude of problem

I would like to thank Richard, Matt, Charlie, Tony, Rich, and anyone else I may have missed for giving me some stats on spam. Unfortunately, it's not quite what I need. As I said before, I'm working on a complementary antispam technique that should provide extremely high barriers to spam visi

Re: [SAtalk] Magnitude of problem

At 02:30 PM 4/21/2002 -0700, Kelsey Cummings wrote: >On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 05:06:55PM -0400, Eric S. Johansson wrote: > > So, any ideas on: > > > > number of active spammers per day > >NFC > > > number of pieces of Spam sent per day > >I

Re: [SAtalk] Magnitude of problem

he administrator wants to. granted this is not practical during early phase of the adoption process but it is something that would be possible. Anyway, this is becoming way off topic for the Spamassassin mailing list. I do appreciate the feedback I get and at worst, I will only disagre

Re: [SAtalk] Magnitude of problem

specially if one wants to preserve end to end connectivity and the ability for any node on Internet to participate fully. My experimentation with camram is an attempt to provide another part of the solution. ---eric ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Re: [SAtalk] Magnitude of problem

because if a spammer decides to start using the coins then it will take the combination of a filter and coins to keep out spam from a mailbox. --- eric ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Re: [SAtalk] Win32 port of SA

and do the right thing. I've found one vendor of a bump in the stack for Windows in South Africa but when I pressed them for documentation, they stopped responding. ---eric ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Re: [SAtalk] Magnitude of problem

At 08:51 AM 4/22/2002 -0700, Bart Schaefer wrote: >On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, Eric S. Johansson wrote: > > > in any case, if one is going to be successful in fighting spam, one needs > > to look at solutions other than filtering, blacklisting network > connections > >

Re: [SAtalk] Magnitude of problem

At 10:26 AM 4/24/2002 -0700, Bart Schaefer wrote: >On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Eric S. Johansson wrote: > > > At 08:51 AM 4/22/2002 -0700, Bart Schaefer wrote: > > > > > >The trouble is that any solution that places a burden on the sender is > > >lousy social engin

[SAtalk] header: "Lid-Tracking: "

ring on it... Thanks! Eric --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.

[SAtalk] spamassassin (2.52) -V reports: SpamAssassin version 2.43

x27;../rules',# ##REMOVED_ON_BUILD## '__def_rules_dir__', '__prefix__/share/spamassassin', '/usr/local/share/spamassassin', '/usr/share/spamassassin', ); Any light anyone can shed on thi

Re: [SAtalk] Procmail recipe question...

e the message subjects and to which mailboxes the messages are going to. However I'm still getting spam comming thru the system and I have also done the following to test that everything is working... [eric@MosEspa eric]$ telnet localhost 783 Trying 127.0.0.1... Connected to localhost. Escape ch

[SAtalk] Re: Procmail recipe question...

On Mon, 2002-06-24 at 01:58, Malte S. Stretz wrote: Sorry the one item I forgot to add to the email was that I do NOT see the X-SPAM-FLAG in the headers in ANY of the emails. > Hi again, Eric :o) > > On Monday 24 June 2002 03:36 CET you wrote: > > I have spamassassin setup in a

[SAtalk] spamc/spamd questions

quot; line in my procmaillog. I would appreciate any assitance with this. I find people asking similar questions in the archives, but they seem to go unanswered. Thanks, Eric --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Bringing you mound

Re: [SAtalk] Re: spamc/spamd questions

n spamc and spamd? I appreciate the suggestion... thanks. --Eric --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Bringing you mounds of caffeinated joy. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Spamassassin-talk mai

Re: [SAtalk] Re: spamc/spamd questions

Or -- what should be equivalently -- have you tried changing > the recipe to > > :0fw > | spamc -u $LOGNAME I've tried both forms -- I did not know what to give -u as an argument before -- but the results are the same: spamc, spamd, but no further logging and no tags. --Eric -

[SAtalk] Sitewide use of spamassassin

Has anyone here implemented a similar design to this? Any feedback you can give me, positive or negative, will be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Eric Bryant IT Security Analyst Purdue University -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use <http:/

[SAtalk] Sql question

Title: Sql question When using an SQL database to store user preferences, once SA queries a particular user, does it cache their preferences or is a query done for every message?  I'm looking at doing this sitewide and I'm wondering how well this performs. Thanks, Eric

Re: [SAtalk] Continuing saga of runaway spamd

We experienced a similar problem on FreeBSD. The problem was addressed when we upgraded perl from 5.5 to 5.8. As a workaround until we managed to upgrade we launched spamd under the control of Dan Bernstein's Daemontools which can be configured to automatically impose limits and restart misbeh