Bart Schaefer writes: > Last time you wrote, I got the impression you weren't getting any procmail > log output. Oh, that was when you were writing to the procmail list ... > sometimes it gets a little confusing to read both lists. You wrote:
Yeah, initially I traced my problems to procmail, but after some changes and testing, I have convinced myself that procmail is holding up its end of the bargain. > Is there a corresponding /var/log/maillog entry for spamd, indicating > that a connection was made? Yes, spamd indicates that a connection was made from localhost, but there's no followup log entry for the virtual domain addresses; email to me generates 'clean message' or 'identified spam' followups, but not so for the virtual users. > Did you try adding DROPPRIVS=yes to /etc/procmailrc before the recipe that > calls spamc? Or -- what should be equivalently -- have you tried changing > the recipe to > > :0fw > | spamc -u $LOGNAME I've tried both forms -- I did not know what to give -u as an argument before -- but the results are the same: spamc, spamd, but no further logging and no tags. --Eric ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Bringing you mounds of caffeinated joy. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
