At 09:40 AM 4/4/2002 +0100, Nigel Metheringham wrote: >On Thu, 2002-04-04 at 05:23, Olivier Nicole wrote: > > > BTW, a serious question. Do you any of you know if on a Cisco router > > it is possible to do transparent redirection for SMTP? > >Yes - you use policy routing. You need a box to accept the SMTP >sessions as the next hop
I need the same answer from the other end of the spectrum. I'm working on a complementary antispam technique (www.camram.org) and I'm fairly close to a working prototype on UNIX boxes. Unfortunately, I need to make this thing work on Windows and Macintosh and what I need is the ability to intercept SMTP/pop 3/IMAP traffic and modify the datastream. Ordinary proxies don't work as well because a user may have multiple e-mail accounts each with their own SMTP/pop 3 addresses. Most plug-in systems don't work well because they handle e-mail either too late or too early for camram. so, any ideas would be welcome. ---eric _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
