Hi, I have written quite a few of my own rules, and would like to test them more systematically than I do now.
1. I've seen people commenting on specific rules, saying that a particular rule generates x false positives and y false negatives against their corpus of ham and spam. How are they running these tests? 2. I would like to run my entire rulebase against a ham/spam corpus, and arrive at statistically "best" weighting of rules. How is this done? Cordially, Eric hart ehart [nospam] npi.net === All NPI email scanned for spam and viruses by SpamRejector(tm). SpamRejector.net ===
