I would like to thank Richard, Matt, Charlie, Tony, Rich, and anyone else I 
may have missed for giving me some stats on spam.  Unfortunately, it's not 
quite what I need.

As I said before, I'm working on a complementary antispam technique that 
should provide extremely high barriers to spam visibility at the end user 
mailbox.  A rough draft of the documentation is at www.camram.org.  another 
nice side effect of the camram system is that it would provide for 
opportunistic encryption of e-mail in transit without requiring any user 
intervention.

One of the core concepts is that initial e-mails between users must contain 
a proof of work postage stamp.  In order for the postage stamp to be 
effective, it must be sufficiently expensive in terms of time or money to a 
bulk mailer to slow them down but not so expensive to an individual as to 
impede their normal usage of e-mail.

One of the problems with modeling the viability of camram is that I don't 
know how many coins spammers would need outside of the obvious one per 
message.  If I knew the number of spammers and the amount of spam they 
generated, I should be able to get a good feel for whether or not proof of 
work postage stamps would be viable and under what conditions would they 
cease to be viable.

So, any ideas on:

        number of active spammers per day
        number of pieces of Spam sent per day
        number of people receiving Spam everyday
        total population of e-mail users


_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to