Re: [SAtalk] SA-2.60rc5 problem

* Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20030921 01:35]: wrote: > On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 10:55:29AM +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > > I installed 2.60rc5 yesterday (I had been running 2.60rc1) and since that time, > > I am seeing the following in the paniclog output of my MTA: > > > > 2003-09-

[SAtalk] All messgages are getting X-Spam-Report as spam, even when not

Hi all - I have been bussy settiing up the new version of Spamassassin 2.6 and it's utilities as suggested by the folks at peregrinehw.com. The install seemed to go without a problem and I have not modified the default "local.cf" I had been running Spamassassin 2.4 for quite a while with no trou

Re: [SAtalk] Outlook rules produce FPs

Hi Kai: Interesting that you are using MailCorral. We spent a few weeks testing it with about 20 email accounts and it would tend to crash and hang - thereby refusing to accept mail. This was two or three months ago and the developer was unable to figure out what was happenning. When it worked

RE: [SAtalk] Whitelist Issue

At 09:26 AM 10/1/03 -0600, Dan Tappin wrote: How would I whitelist a machine? AFAIK there's no normal whitelist support for that, but you could get that effect with a custom header rule. For example: header LOCAL_RCVD_PRIV_TELUSPLANET Received =~ /priv-.{0,20}\.telusplanet\.net/i score LO

Re: [SAtalk] Tons of emails that are masqueraded

Hi Martin, On 2003-10-01 02:36:52 +, Peter Richards wrote: > About 95% of the emails are from AOL. Is this something that SpamAssasin > can do ? I do have about 20 "valid" email addresses for the domain, it all Yes. http://www.exit0.us/index.php/VirusBounceRules Great, thanks for the link,

Re: [SAtalk] Tons of emails that are masqueraded

Hi Martin, On 2003-10-01 02:36:52 +, Peter Richards wrote: > About 95% of the emails are from AOL. Is this something that SpamAssasin > can do ? I do have about 20 "valid" email addresses for the domain, it all Yes. http://www.exit0.us/index.php/VirusBounceRules Great, thanks for the link,

Re: [SAtalk] More Bayes (again)

> >0.000 0 2 0 non-token data: bayes db version > >0.000 0 1 0 non-token data: nspam > >0.000 0 0 0 non-token data: nham > >0.000 0116 0 non-token data: ntokens > > ---sni

[SAtalk] RE: Help? SA2.60 can't locate SOA.pm Related to Received headers, and BlackList(s) query in local.cf

> Error: Can't locate Net/DNS/RR/SOA.pm in @INC > Related to Received headers, and BlackList(s) query. After much more testing, ... spamassassin -D < ~/saetc/mail/spamassassin/sample-nonspam.txt results in an error: Can't locate Net/DNS/RR/SOA.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /home/anitech/sausr/li

Re: [SAtalk] BAYES broken from 2.55 to 2.6

At 08:24 30/09/2003 -0700, Danny Aldham wrote: > As with any major new release of software, it pays to read the README and > INSTALL file. Right at the very top of the INSTALL file: > > Important Note For Users Upgrading From Earlier Versions > -

Re: [SAtalk] More Bayes (again)

At 17:55 1/10/2003 -0400, Jack Gostl wrote: > > Now that I've straightened out my sa-learn script, I've stopped getting > > BAYES__ and false positives. The problem is that I've also stopped getting > > any Bayes hits at all. > > > > I've put a heckuvalot of spam/ham through the learning process.

[SAtalk] RE: Help? SA2.60 can't locate SOA.pm Related to Received headers, and BlackList(s) query in local.cf

> Related to Received headers, and BlackList(s) query in local.cf. > Error does NOT happen if added RBL checks are removed from local.cf > Error does happen with: > header RCVD_IN_BONDEDSENDER eval:check_rbl('bonded', 'query.bondedsender.org.') > Error does NOT happen with: > header RCVD_IN_BONDE

[SAtalk] Unable to connect to any discovery servers

For some reason razor-check and razor-report doesn't work at all with Spamassassin. I am running Spamassassin 2.60 and Razor 2.36 on RH 9.0 with Perl 5.8.1. SA (spamd) is being called from procmail using spamc. The Spamassassin daemon is running as 'spamd' without any root privileges. A patc

Re: [SAtalk] Spam Assassin for w32

On 2003-10-01 13:26:52 -0500, Your Own ISP .com wrote: > Since there seems to be a ton of activity on this list and near zero to do > with SA on Windows, I have created list specific to SpamAssassin on W32 > platforms. Good! Now please all of you who use Outlook, can't quote and send HTML mails pl

[SAtalk] Help? SA2.60 can't locate SOA.pm Related to Received headers, and BlackList(s) query in local.cf

Related to Received headers, and BlackList(s) query in local.cf. Error does NOT happen if added RBL checks are removed from local.cf Error does happen with: header RCVD_IN_BONDEDSENDER eval:check_rbl('bonded', 'query.bondedsender.org.') Error does NOT happen with: header RCVD_IN_BONDEDSENDER eva

Re: [SAtalk] X-Header: SUBJ_ILLEGAL_CHARS

On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Thorsten Franzke wrote: > Hi, > > I am having the problem that certain messages from my message board get > bounced at gmx.de (large German freemailer) which is using spamassassin for > header filtering. > > If I look into the X-headers I do find the following: > > X-GMX-Antisp

Re: [SAtalk] More Bayes (again)

Jack Gostl writes: >Now I'm really really confused. I wiped the Bayes database and did a >spam/ham learning run. Here is the output from sa-learn. > >Learned from 13 message(s) (13 message(s) examined). >Learned from 121 message(s) (121 message(s) examined). >Learned from 274 message(s) (274 messa

Re: [SAtalk] Does the * in the X-Spam-Level header upset procmail

> On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 20:26:22 -0400 (EDT) > Satya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Oct 1, 2003 at 00:03, Nigel Wilkinson wrote: > > > > >I want to filter useing the number of asterixes in the X-Spam-Level > > >header but I think this is a wildcard in procmail. Does anyone know > > >if this wi

[SAtalk] Outlook rules produce FPs

I got one of the few FPs today. SA 2.60. 1.1 FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML Outlook can't send HTML message only 1.0 FORGED_OUTLOOK_TAGS Outlook can't send HTML in this format I get the first when spamd gets the message from our milter (MailCorral), which apparently munges it a bit, and the second when usi

Re: SMTP reject != bounce (was Re[2]: [SAtalk] Autodeleting spam based on score

On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Pat Masterson wrote: > Dave - what is the purpse of having required_hits at 6 and reject at 18? > what do you do with the mail that rates more than 6? -pat Because of the possibility of False-Positives, I don't want to risk rejecting stuff that users might want. (faculty get r

Re: [SAtalk] Does the * in the X-Spam-Level header upset procmail

On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 20:26:22 -0400 (EDT) Satya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Oct 1, 2003 at 00:03, Nigel Wilkinson wrote: > > >I want to filter useing the number of asterixes in the X-Spam-Level > >header but I think this is a wildcard in procmail. Does anyone know > >if this will upset procmai

[SAtalk] Debugging Spamassassin

As suggested I added the -D to the startup: [EMAIL PROTECTED] log]# ps afx | grep spamd 705 ?S 0:00 /usr/bin/perl /usr/bin/spamd -d -c -a -D Here is what I see in my maillog file: NOTE To me (an unaided eye) it all looks good. But, if I send mail in from the outside I see no

Re: Re[2]: [SAtalk] Autodeleting spam based on score without deleting all spam

On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Mike Carlson wrote: > How do I set up Sendmail to reject email with a high score or forward email > to a local mailbox if it is within a certain range of score? > > I am a sendmail n00b, and so far my google searches haven't gotten me too > far. OK, you need 3 pieces: 'spamd

Re: [SAtalk] More Bayes (again)

> > Now that I've straightened out my sa-learn script, I've stopped getting > > BAYES__ and false positives. The problem is that I've also stopped getting > > any Bayes hits at all. > > > > I've put a heckuvalot of spam/ham through the learning process. Is there > > any easy way to check if I've h

[SAtalk] 2.60 install RH 7.1 failed dependencies

Trying to install 2.60 using src rpms on RH 7.1. After doing rpm --rebuild spamassassin-2.60.src.rpm and rpm -ivvh perl-Mail-SpamAssassin-2.60-1.i386.rpm...getting failed dependencies error: failed dependencies: perl(Pod::Usage) is needed by perl-Mail-SpamAssassin-2.60-1 perl(HTML::

[SAtalk] Cannot open bayes.. R/W lock failed

SA 2.60 on Windows 2000 under CommuniGate Pro using CGPSA (which calls SA through the perl object, not using the .bat file), but is single-threaded under Windows. I regularly see the following error message in the log: Cannot open bayes databases C:\Documents and Settings\Default User.WINNT/.spama

RE: [SAtalk] Prevalence of BASE64 messages containing '

On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Chris Santerre wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Shane Allen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 3:43 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: [SAtalk] Prevalence of BASE64 messages containing > > 'http://www.emphasys.net > > > > 1) Yo

Re: [SAtalk] Re: spamd & qmail, round 2...

The ifspam script I looked at specifically had a test for mail greater than 250k... mail of that size is delivered via forward to the address after the call to ifspam. Double check your script and look for a "`cat $output | wc -c`" call... thats the one that gets the message size. You may need

Re: [SAtalk] More Bayes (again)

> > Now that I've straightened out my sa-learn script, I've stopped getting > BAYES__ and false positives. The problem is that I've also stopped getting > any Bayes hits at all. > > I've put a heckuvalot of spam/ham through the learning process. Is there > any easy way to check if I've hit the thre

[SAtalk] RE: blacklist_to

As a few people have kindly replied, this feature is in 2.60. I am using 2.55 and was waiting for final release of 2.60 which apparently happened last week. Thanks for the info, folks. As an aside... I never was able to find a changelog on the SA website. Is there one and if so, can someone point

Re: [SAtalk] Bayes

Bart Schaefer wrote: On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Jack Gostl wrote: That new Bayes algorithm is mighty touchy. So far its tagged four real messages with a BAYES_99, three of them today alone. In just five days it has had twice the false positives that 2.55 had in four months. I noticed similar be

[SAtalk] Prevalence of BASE64 messages containing '

We are debating banning appropriate base64-encoded strings on our server, probably via SpamAssassin, but I had a question regarding its feasability. Specifically, there are techniques for generating every possible permutation on a base64 string. We would like to apply these techniques to the strin

SMTP reject != bounce (was Re[2]: [SAtalk] Autodeleting spam based on score without deleting all spam)

On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Bill wrote: > > > How do I set up Sendmail to reject email with a high score or > > forward email to a local mailbox if it is within a certain > > range of score? > > The way I would do it is with a procmail recipe. Configure spamassassin to > use the stars header system and th

RE: [SAtalk] Prevalence of BASE64 messages containing '

> -Original Message- > From: Shane Allen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 3:43 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [SAtalk] Prevalence of BASE64 messages containing > 'http://www.emphasys.net > 1) You read my mind! I've wanted to do this for quite some ti

RE: [SAtalk] Spam Assassin for w32

Not trying to pick fights, this is not a flame just an IMO. I'm not sure how I feel about Spamassassin porting to Windows. SA is a great example of why Open Source is a superior method of programming. Porting a free binary for Windows seems a little against the spirit of the OS philosophy. However

Re: [SAtalk] Microsoft Outlook and saving spams for learning..

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/10/2003 15:43 Richard Bates wrote: > I have a question about when you save a mail as mailname.msg from > microsoft outlook > > sa-learn --spam --dir /home/bates/JunkMail > sa-learn --ham --dir /home/bates/HamMail > > It doesn't seam to be le

RE: [SAtalk] Spam Assassin for w32

I'd be very much for this. As much as I like unix, I think that there is a need for this type of technology on the Windows platform as well. Some companies don't use linux because they're not used to it. However they still want anti-spam, and like the spamassassin name, since they have read abo

RE: [SAtalk] Spam Assassin for w32

> -Original Message- > From: Frank Pineau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 2:57 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Spam Assassin for w32 > > > On Wed, 2003-10-01 at 13:26, Your Own ISP .com wrote: > > Since there seems to be a ton of activity

Re: [SAtalk] required value met, but spam not flagged

On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 12:00:41PM -0400 or thereabouts, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 08:55:08AM -0700, John Schneider wrote: > > I have been working too much lately, so my eyes might be a little > > crossed But, the following message seems to have met the required value > >

[SAtalk] Re: Pyzor in 2.60?

On Wednesday 01 October 2003 17:14 CET Robert Leonard III wrote: > Since upgrading to 2.60, I don't see that Pyzor is being used anymore.. > yet I don't see any reference saying that it is no longer supported.. has > anybody else noticed this, or can anybody clue me in as to what happened > or migh

Re: [SAtalk] Spam Assassin for w32

On Wed, 2003-10-01 at 13:26, Your Own ISP .com wrote: > Since there seems to be a ton of activity on this list and near zero > to do with SA on Windows, I have created list specific to SpamAssassin > on W32 platforms. > > > > I searched for this first but did not find anything. I would love to

Re: [SAtalk] blacklist_to

This feature is included with 2.60, which version are you using? Frederic Tarasevicius Internet Information Services, Inc. Colin A. Bartlett wrote: > Hello All, > > Been using SpamAssassin myself for about a year now; about a month or > so site-wide. > > Only one feature I wish existed: black

[SAtalk] Re: Microsoft Outlook and saving spams for learning..

On Wednesday 01 October 2003 16:43 CET Richard Bates wrote: > I have a question about when you save a mail as mailname.msg from > microsoft outlook >[...] > After looking at the mailname.msg files, they appear to look like this.. > > –œ ‡°± · IIRC are the Outlook .msg files binary files, no format

[SAtalk] Spam Assassin for w32

Title: Message Since there seems to be a ton of activity on this list and near zero to do with SA on Windows, I have created list specific to SpamAssassin on W32 platforms.   I searched for this first but did not find anything. I would love to get some folks together to discuss some Wind

[SAtalk] Re: Upgraded from 2.60beta to 2.60 final, now problems

On Wednesday 01 October 2003 17:36 CET Chris Barnes wrote: >[...] > What am I missing? TFM, the FAQ and sa-learn --import. Cheers, Malte -- [SGT] Simon G. Tatham: "How to Report Bugs Effectively" [ESR] Eric S. Raymond: "How To Ask Qu

Re: [SAtalk] blacklist_to

Colin A. Bartlett writes: > Only one feature I wish existed: blacklist_to Use SpamAssassin 2.60. --j. --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf

Re: [SAtalk] Microsoft Outlook and saving spams for learning..

thank you this seems like a viable solution. On Wednesday, October 1, 2003, at 01:38 PM, Brad Tarver wrote: The header info isn't stripped, but it the .msg files are still wrapped in TNEF.   Another way to save them (this is how I do it) is to setup an IMAP account thru Outlook Express, sync the

Re: [SAtalk] 10_misc.cf in brazilian portuguese

ZOE - Marcelo writes: > Here is the 10_misc.cf file translated to brazilian portuguese. Hi Marcelo -- could you open a bug at http://bugzilla.SpamAssassin.org/ ? that's the correct way to pass code for inclusion in SpamAssassin (it means we can track the contributions better). --j. ---

RE: [SAtalk] Microsoft Outlook and saving spams for learning..

It's not stripped... It's a binary file.. Outlook needs to read it (or at least the outlook object model -- which is available to win32-perl through Win32::OLE and the MAPI.Session object). Steven -Original Message- From: Richard Bates [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, Octobe

RE: [SAtalk] Microsoft Outlook and saving spams for learning..

Title: Message  The header info isn't stripped, but it the .msg files are still wrapped in TNEF.   Another way to save them (this is how I do it) is to setup an IMAP account thru Outlook Express, sync the messages, then drag them out to a folder on your filesystem. This will expor

RE: [SAtalk] dynablock confusion...

On Oct 1, 2003 at 12:02, VonEssen, John wrote: >Given your info, I am still confused why this test is in SA with a >significant score. Tons of people legitimately relay to mails hosts that >are off their network: > >- people who use a third party hosting company for @theirdomain.com >email This i

[SAtalk] blacklist_to

Hello All, Been using SpamAssassin myself for about a year now; about a month or so site-wide. Only one feature I wish existed: blacklist_to I give out LOTS of different email addresses that all go back to the same box. Often I give out [EMAIL PROTECTED] when I register on a site that I'm a bit

[SAtalk] new mail with old headers

Is there a score for mail that comes in more than 4 days old? I had Nigerian spam come in today, that was properly flagged as such, and the date/time stamps from my server are accurate, but I would like to add additional weight for spamishness when all the other Recieved or Date headers are more t

Re: [SAtalk] Will just header work for Bayes

On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 11:22:18AM -0500, Smart,Dan wrote: > Can you trap just headers to train bayes? An :0hci created file is much > smaller than a :0ci file. you can, but you're not going to get very far that way. the point of bayes is to generate probabilities on the message, not just the he

Re: [SAtalk] Microsoft Outlook and saving spams for learning..

both Text and HTML seem strip the Header information... On Wednesday, October 1, 2003, at 12:19 PM, Nicholson, Rob wrote: .msg files are binary Outlook messages and I doubt they can be read apart from anything but Outlook. Would converting them into HTML or plain text help? -Original Messa

RE: [SAtalk] dynablock confusion...

John, clearly you have a special case. For me the DYNABLOCK test is significant, and I'll explain why. An ISP puts its blocks of IP addresses that are dynamically assigned into the black list because those addresses should not be sending mail directly. It's a way to enforce their terms of servic

[SAtalk] More Bayes (again)

Now that I've straightened out my sa-learn script, I've stopped getting BAYES__ and false positives. The problem is that I've also stopped getting any Bayes hits at all. I've put a heckuvalot of spam/ham through the learning process. Is there any easy way to check if I've hit the threshold yet? I

RE: [SAtalk] Microsoft Outlook and saving spams for learning..

Most likely not, from what I've seen (though, I am SA newbie). You probably want to look into the outlook object model.. (mail me offline if you need some pointers) But the short answer is that you want to $string = $message->Fields()->Item(0x7D001E).$message->{Text}; open(FILE,">thismessageas

[SAtalk] Re: where do i defined what should happen with SPAM mails

Mrvka Andreas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hi > > where do i define what should happen with spams? > move to specific folder, get deleted, etc. ? Most people use procmail. Note that procmail is not for the faint of heart... -- + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +

[SAtalk] Will just header work for Bayes

Title: Blank Stationery Can you trap just headers to train bayes?  An :0hci created file is much smaller than a :0ci file.   <>

RE: [SAtalk] required value met, but spam not flagged

Thanks for the quick reply. I'm sure this must have been in the list archives. Thanks. Regards, John Schneider Information Systems Manager, DAUM Commercial Real Estate Services -Original Message- From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 9:01

RE: [SAtalk] dynablock confusion...

Matt, Thanks for the clarification - it explains a few things. The reason for all this is because I provide "out-sourced" email services to people who are willing to pay for added features like Spam and Virus filtering. Most of my clients connect to the internet via DSL or Cable (Comcast). We th

Re: [SAtalk] required value met, but spam not flagged

On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 08:55:08AM -0700, John Schneider wrote: > I have been working too much lately, so my eyes might be a little > crossed But, the following message seems to have met the required value > for spam, but was not flagged: > > Received: from supply.erhouse.com ([211.217.250.70]

Re: [SAtalk] dynablock confusion...

I'm new to SA so forgive... but I saw this same problem when I upgraded to SA 2.60 from 2.55.. all incoming mail from anybody on Earthlink, or Verizon.. either DSL or Dialup was being tagged... it appeared as if SA was seeing the IP of the sending machine, not of the relaying SMTP server.. I manu

Re: [SAtalk] required value met, but spam not flagged

The 8.0 value you're seeing for the score is a rounded value, and is probably slightly below 8. John Schneider wrote: I have been working too much lately, so my eyes might be a little crossed But, the following message seems to have met the required value for spam, but was not flagged: [s

Re: [SAtalk] Cannot debug spamassassin

- Original Message - From: "Bob Ambroso" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 12:20 AM Subject: [SAtalk] Cannot debug spamassassin Can anyone direct me in debugging SpamAssassin install? As far as I can tell, it is installed correctly (using Qmai

[SAtalk] Upgraded from 2.60beta to 2.60 final, now problems

I upgraded from 2.60beta (version prior to the rc1) to 2.60 final. SA itself seems to be running fine (meaning it is catching and tagging messages like it should). However, the bayes database seems to be toast. A look at the ~/.spamassassin directory shows: drwx--2 cbarnes barnes

Re: [SAtalk] Re: spamd & qmail, round 2...

Rumor has it that Ralf Guenthner may have mentioned these words: I'm also running spamd under supervise and just recently I asked this list why I couldn't get the -D option to work. Where were you guys then? ;-) I wasn't here yet... so I have an excuse! ;-) I solved it in the meantime by sending

Re: [SAtalk] required value met, but spam not flagged

On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 08:55:08AM -0700, John Schneider wrote: > I have been working too much lately, so my eyes might be a little > crossed But, the following message seems to have met the required value > for spam, but was not flagged: > > X-Spam-Level: *** > X-Spam-Status: No, hits=8.0

[SAtalk] DCC timeout not working with spamd 2.55

Hi, I am having a problem with spamd 2.55 and DCC timeout. I have set DCC timeout to 5 seconds and if it times out I would expect no value to be returned for the DCC test. However when DCC times out I appear to be getting the default values for the DCC test which where set when spamd initialis

[SAtalk] required value met, but spam not flagged

I have been working too much lately, so my eyes might be a little crossed But, the following message seems to have met the required value for spam, but was not flagged: Received: from supply.erhouse.com ([211.217.250.70]) by server.com (8.12.8/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h91FMGUx066014 for <[EMAIL

Re: [SAtalk] dynablock confusion...

First, most of your message has a lot of misconceptions about dynablock, and SA's use of it. It's also very long so, I'm just going to leave it out, and reply to your points of confusion free-form. Dynablock does not block spamsources. It lists the IPs of dialups, cablemodems, and DSL, regardle

Re: [SAtalk] where do i defined what should happen with SPAM mails

On 2003-10-01 16:05:20 +0200, Mrvka Andreas wrote: > where do i define what should happen with spams? > move to specific folder, get deleted, etc. ? man procmail You might want to read the FAQ, btw. Best regards Martin -- Martin Schröder, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ArtCom Gmb

RE: [SAtalk] Whitelist Issue

A... I see. Thanks Matt. I mis-understood the white list format. How would I whitelist a machine? I have Ham that is from major local ISP's that I would like to white list. I can figure out there SMTP server naming conventions for example: priv-edtnes57.telusplanet.net -> priv-*.telusplan

[SAtalk] pyzor not found

I am getting an error saying pyzor is not found: Oct 1 09:46:55 altair spamd[7110]: debug: Pyzor is not available: pyzor not found I installed pyzor and it is in the path, but for some reason it cant find it. I had the same issue on my home box, but I just installed pyzor and it was fixed. I am

Re: [SAtalk] Re: spamd & qmail, round 2...

Rumor has it that Klaus Alexander Seistrup may have mentioned these words: On Roger Merchberger wrote: > 1) Is anyone else running spamd from tcpserver? I've been running spamd under dæmontools/supervise with a run file similar to yours for months -- works like a charm. (You did mean supervise ra

Re: [SAtalk] Re: spamd & qmail, round 2...

- Original Message - From: "Klaus Alexander Seistrup" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 8:22 PM Subject: [SAtalk] Re: spamd & qmail, round 2... > On Roger Merchberger wrote: > > > 1) Is anyone else running spamd from tcpserver? > > I've been ru

RE: [SAtalk] Silly question about whitelist to a certain mailbox

Well, I use procmail to send mail to SA. So how about a recipe, checking to see if mail is to that certain mailbox, and putting that recipe before the recipe that sends "everything else" to SA? I find that procmail solves a whole host of my email problems, btw. William L. Polhemus, Jr. P.E. Polh

Re: [SAtalk] Whitelist Issue

At 08:45 AM 10/1/03 -0600, Dan Tappin wrote: whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] whitelist_from_rcvd *.tsn.ca tsn.ca whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] whitelist_from_rcvd *.theglobeandmail.comtheglobeandmail.com Am I missing something obvious here? Well that

Re: [SAtalk] Bayes db in mysql

On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 10:19:48AM -0500, Chris Hilts wrote: > Is anyone currently working on storing the bayes databases in mysql? I've > already got SQL prefs working, which I like very much. I want to enable > Bayes on my domain, but am unwilling to create home directories for my > (otherwise

[SAtalk] Pyzor in 2.60?

Since upgrading to 2.60, I don't see that Pyzor is being used anymore.. yet I don't see any reference saying that it is no longer supported.. has anybody else noticed this, or can anybody clue me in as to what happened or might be happening? Thanks!!

[SAtalk] 10_misc.cf in brazilian portuguese

Here is the 10_misc.cf file translated to brazilian portuguese. I have problems with the acute accent an other.   I am sending they 2 one without the accents and other with the accents.   If there is some clue about how can put the accents.   Hope it can help.   Marcelo Cruzeta ZOE Informátic

[SAtalk] Re: spamd & qmail, round 2...

On Roger Merchberger wrote: > 1) Is anyone else running spamd from tcpserver? I've been running spamd under dæmontools/supervise with a run file similar to yours for months -- works like a charm. (You did mean supervise rather than tcpserver, didn't you?) // Klaus -- ><>o mordo tua nu

[SAtalk] Bayes db in mysql

Is anyone currently working on storing the bayes databases in mysql? I've already got SQL prefs working, which I like very much. I want to enable Bayes on my domain, but am unwilling to create home directories for my (otherwise virtual) users. If someone's working on this, I'd like to offer my a

[SAtalk] Cannot debug spamassassin

Can anyone direct me in debugging SpamAssassin install? As far as I can tell, it is installed correctly (using Qmailscanner, Clam, Spamassassin) as I do not get any errors anywhere, yet I do not see spamassassing is doing anything. No timestamps, no log entries, no nothing? All I see in /var/lo

Re: [SAtalk] 'Opt'

On Sep 30, 2003 at 15:03, Robert Leonard III wrote: >I hadn't thought of that! That sounds like a bug to me then.. surely my >company isn't the only one that has the letters opt in their name?! Blame the spammers. >Is there a process I should go through to report this? I think there's a way to

Re: [SAtalk] Bayes (again)

At 08:04 AM 10/1/03 -0400, Jack Gostl wrote: By the way, when I say "caught", I'm passing in the spam, heaer and all, that SpamAssassin caught. Maybe this is causing the problem. That should be a non-issue. SA will automatically remove it's own markups when learning. However, if you're doing som

Re: [SAtalk] where do i defined what should happen with SPAM mails

Original Message - From: "Mrvka Andreas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Talk about SpamAssassin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 4:05 PM Subject: [SAtalk] where do i defined what should happen with SPAM mails > hi > > where do i define what should happen with spams? > mo

[SAtalk] bayes db locking

Shortly after upgrading to 2.60, I started getting these errors: spamd[29617]: lock: 29617 unlink of lock file \ /u/fletcher/.spamassassin/bayes.lock failed: No such file or directory And running db_verify, I find cs.utexas.edu$ /lusr/BerkeleyDB.4.1/bin/db_verify bayes_toks db_verify: P

[SAtalk] uninitialized value

I have Spamassassin 2.60 installed on my FreeBSD 4.7 box, everything works fine but sometimes in my system logs occur strange lines, like this: Sep 30 00:53:34 omega spamd[91935]: Use of uninitialized value at /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005/Mail/SpamAssassin/Bayes.pm line 515, chunk 1461. S

Re: [SAtalk] Silly question about whitelist to a certain mailbox

At 09:42 AM 10/1/03 -0400, Jennifer Fountain wrote: Is there anyway to configure SA to not check spam status for certain mailboxes? IE: my hr dept wants their resume acct not tag any email as spam - regardless. I guess - is there a way to whitelist recepients? SA itself does not have access to t

Re: [SAtalk] Forwarding email to learn

And along those same lines.. if a piece of mail comes in, and is learned as a certain type, be it ham or spam... but in the end it's decided that it should be the other way around. If this is a user, how do you automate re-learning it? Isn't the proper way to "forget" it, and then relearn.. i

RE: [SAtalk] 2.60 Upgrade - SpamD not using trained bayes databas e

Bart, Thanks for the reply. Will try the process you propose, and get rid of the timepath statement, since timing is now gone from SA. <> | -Original Message- | From: Bart Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 12:01 PM | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Subject:

[SAtalk] Whitelist Issue

Below is the header of a legitimate mailing list message that keeps getting flagged as spam: Here is part of my local.cf file where I tried to whitelist it: whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] whitelist_from_rcvd *.tsn.ca tsn.ca whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] w

RE: [SAtalk] Silly question about whitelist to a certain mailbox

Jennifer: Good news! It's easy. Just use the whitelist_to statement. You will add that to the ~/.spamassassin/user_perfs file. Syntax is as follows - whitelist_to [EMAIL PROTECTED] If the given address appears as a recipient in the message headers (Resent-To, To, Cc, obvious envelope recipie

[SAtalk] Spam Assassin Question

How do I troubleshoot Spamassassin??? I installed everything as instructed on a site called qmailrocks and while I did not get any error messages during the install, I do not see that spamassassin is working.. All I see in /var/log/maillog is this: Sep 25 12:39:24 webmail spamd[705]: server sta

RE: [SAtalk] Silly question about whitelist to a certain mailbox

you rock! thank you. I was wondering if I could do that but couldn't find anything. maybe I googled wrong. Thanks! -Original Message- From: Info Desk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 10:42 AM To: Jennifer Fountain; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Silly

[SAtalk] AWL much slower in 2.60?

[ Apologies if this already appeared; I don't see it in the archives. ] Howdy, Just upgraded to 2.60, seems to work great for the most part! Catching even more spam than before (as to be expected). One thing which has become a bit of a problem - AWL seem to be much slower in some cases, althoug

[SAtalk] sa-learn learns mbox, but bayes doesn't work

Hi folks, I think I've got the same problem that Dan described a couple of days ago. I set up new 2.60er SA (I previously used 2.43, so I got no old bayes- data) and began to train the bayes-filter with my spam-mbox file. I trained the ham afterwards, and when I looked into the db it said, tha

[SAtalk] Microsoft Outlook and saving spams for learning..

I have a question about when you save a mail as mailname.msg from microsoft outlook sa-learn --spam --dir /home/bates/JunkMail sa-learn --ham --dir /home/bates/HamMail It doesn't seam to be learning my Spams... will the command spamassassin -r < /home/bates/JunkMail/mailname.msg remove

Re: [SAtalk] Silly question about whitelist to a certain mailbox

On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 09:42:31AM -0400 or thereabouts, Jennifer Fountain wrote: > Is there anyway to configure SA to not check spam status for certain > mailboxes? IE: my hr dept wants their resume acct not tag any email as > spam - regardless. I guess - is there a way to whitelist recepients?

  1   2   >