juan wrote:
Edward Murphy via agora-discussion [2025-02-17 21:10]:
RadicalRose wrote:
I activate myself. I push the boulder.
[…]
This may have been ineffective in re-registering you (see CFJ 4100). I
recommend announcing "I register", just in case.
But RadicalRose wasn'
On 2/20/25 12:57 AM, secretsnail9 via agora-discussion wrote:
A few issues i can think of: coming up with 100 events could be hard, and
To be clear, it's 100 (or however many) samples from the set of events. We
don't need that much more than 24 events in total to get a decent varie
On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 6:24 AM Mischief via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> I know the tournament hasn't started yet, but I had an idea already:
> Agoran
> Bingo.
>
> Quick summary of bingo in case it's not a thing in other coun
---
> 9214~ Mischief1.0 Stone Badgers
I vote PRESENT
On Tue, 18 Feb 2025, 21:01 Katherina Walshe-Grey via agora-business, <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 2025-02-17 at
Mischief via agora-discussion [2025-02-18 07:23]:
> I know the tournament hasn't started yet, but I had an idea already: Agoran
> Bingo.
I love it.
It's perfect for my skill set: reading messages, keeping records, and doing
nothing.
--
juan
Edward Murphy via agora-discussion [2025-02-17 21:10]:
> RadicalRose wrote:
>
> > I activate myself. I push the boulder.
> >
> […]
>
> This may have been ineffective in re-registering you (see CFJ 4100). I
> recommend announcing "I register", just in ca
I know the tournament hasn't started yet, but I had an idea already: Agoran
Bingo.
Quick summary of bingo in case it's not a thing in other countries: players
have 5x5 boards; the centermost square is "free" (automatically counts). The
remaining 24 symbols vary from board to board, both in
RadicalRose wrote:
I activate myself. I push the boulder.
--
RadicalRose
Hat: knitted cap
This may have been ineffective in re-registering you (see CFJ 4100). I
recommend announcing "I register", just in case.
--
[ANSC H:GE V:G B:0]
On 2/17/25 5:43 PM, Matt Smyth via agora-business wrote:
Does this mean my lily stamp is rare, now? Or is that not how it works xp
Three things going on here...
1) players can be active or inactive. The difference is mainly that inactive
players can be deregistered after 60 days (without 3
Does this mean my lily stamp is rare, now? Or is that not how it works xp
--
juniper
On Tue, 18 Feb 2025, 08:45 secretsnail9 via agora-business, <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 7:26 PM secretsnail9 via agora-business <
> agora-busin...@agoran
I push the boulder whilst sleepwalking
——
Ben
From: agora-business on behalf of Kiako
via agora-business
Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2025 9:52:40 PM
To: agora-busin...@agoranomic.org
Cc: Kiako
Subject: BUS: (@Absurdor) Slippery Slopes
I push the boulder
On 2/16/25 20:01, Janet Cobb via agora-official wrote:
> PROPOSAL 9211 (De-Convoluting Mooting v1.1)
> AUTHOR: Kate
> CLASS: ORDINARY
> FOR (8): 4st, Janet^, Kate%, Mischief^, Murphy^, ais523%, juan%, kiako$
> AGAINST (0):
> PRESENT (1): snail^
> BALLOTS: 9
> AI (F/A): 40
In order to avoid bias (or the appearance of bias), I usually attempt to
assign judicial cases to people who were not involved in the
circumstances under investigation and have not become significantly
invested in any following discussion.
Recently, this has been challenging because there are rela
On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 11:59 AM Janet Cobb via agora-business
wrote:
> On 2/13/25 14:47, Gaelan Steele via agora-business wrote:
> >> On Feb 13, 2025, at 7:40 PM, Katherina Walshe-Grey via agora-business
> >> wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2025-02-13 at 19:38 +, Ga
On Fri, 2025-02-07 at 19:25 -0600, secretsnail9 via agora-business wrote:
> This is a call to action instead of inaction. I think it might be time for
> a revival of sorts, given the lack of gameplay right now, and a recent
> burst of interest. I will be in support of any proposals
Mischief via agora-discussion [2025-02-07 18:44]:
> On 2/6/25 8:20 AM, juan via agora-discussion wrote:
>
> > That's why I created a civic duty rewarding scheme for deactivations
> > that no one seemed to notice.
>
> For those of us drawing a blank here, coul
On Sun, 2025-02-09 at 12:09 -0800, Edward Murphy via agora-discussion
wrote:
> Kate wrote:
>
> > Have I fixed my email?
>
> I don't know, have you?
>
Apparently so!
~qenya
Kate wrote:
Have I fixed my email?
I don't know, have you?
--
[ANSC H:GE V:G B:0]
Have I fixed my email?
~qenya
On Sun, 2025-02-09 at 20:58 +0800, Finley W. via agora-discussion
wrote:
> I object to my deactivation and push the boulder. (Salute)
You sent that to agora-discussion; it won't do anything unless you send
it to agora-business.
--
ais523
I object to my deactivation and push the boulder. (Salute)
On Sat, Feb 8, 2025, 9:26 AM secretsnail9 via agora-business, <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> This is a call to action instead of inaction. I think it might be time for
> a revival of sorts, given the lack of gamepl
I believe I have pushed the boulder as well as claimed the Veblen.
Also I own the Veblen and it has infinite points and is thus no longer
pointless.
——
Ben
From: agora-business on behalf of
secretsnail9 via agora-business
Sent: Friday, February 7, 2025 8:25
On 2/6/25 8:20 AM, juan via agora-discussion wrote:
That's why I created a civic duty rewarding scheme for deactivations
that no one seemed to notice.
For those of us drawing a blank here, could you remind us?
--
Mischief
Collector, Illuminator, Prime Minister
Hat: steampunk hat
Vit
On Fri, 2025-02-07 at 11:08 -0800, 4st nomic via agora-business wrote:
> I vote FOR on 9211
> I vote FOR on 9212
> I vote FOR on 9213
> I vote FOR on 9214
Despite the thread subject, I don't think 9214 was actually
distributed?
--
ais523
Matt Smyth via agora-business [2025-02-06 07:03]:
> […] noting that I'm somehow still active after a few months of
> inactivity.
As a fan of automation for boring tasks, I avoid doing things I don't
MUST if they cannot be automated.
That's why I created a civic duty
Janet Cobb via agora-discussion [2025-02-05 17:21]:
> Testing Discord RSS feed.
Wow what. Is there a digest one? This is interesting.
Also, I support any intents to declare Apathy.
--
juan
On Thu, 2025-02-06 at 07:16 -0500, Mischief via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 2/5/25 1:02 PM, ais523 via agora-business wrote:
> > On Wed, 2025-02-05 at 17:44 +, Katherina Walshe-Grey via agora-
> > business wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2025-02-05 at 02:16 -0600, secretsnail9 v
On 2/5/25 1:02 PM, ais523 via agora-business wrote:
On Wed, 2025-02-05 at 17:44 +, Katherina Walshe-Grey via agora-
business wrote:
On Wed, 2025-02-05 at 02:16 -0600, secretsnail9 via agora-official
wrote:
9211~ qenya, Mischief 1.7 De-Convoluting Mooting v1.1
9212* Mischief
On Wed, Feb 5, 2025 at 1:02 PM ais523 via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 2025-02-05 at 17:44 +, Katherina Walshe-Grey via agora-
> business wrote:
> > On Wed, 2025-02-05 at 02:16 -0600, secretsnail9 via agora-official
> > wrote:
>
Testing Discord RSS feed.
This messages contains no game actions.
--
Janet Cobb
Assessor, Rulekeepor
On 2/5/25 12:53, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Wed, 2025-02-05 at 17:44 +, Katherina Walshe-Grey via agora-
> business wrote:
>> On Wed, 2025-02-05 at 02:16 -0600, secretsnail9 via agora-official
>> wrote:
>>> 9211~ qenya, Mischief 1.7 De-Convol
On Wed, 2025-02-05 at 17:44 +, Katherina Walshe-Grey via agora-
business wrote:
> On Wed, 2025-02-05 at 02:16 -0600, secretsnail9 via agora-official
> wrote:
> > 9211~ qenya, Mischief 1.7 De-Convoluting Mooting v1.1
> > 9212* Mischief 3.0 I
Mischief via agora-discussion [2025-01-31 21:13]:
> On 1/31/25 9:10 PM, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> > Ah, oops.
> >
> > However, only 7 should have failed since I was transferred 4 spendies for
> > that CFJ whose number I can't look up right now.
&
Kate wrote:
On Sun, 2025-01-26 at 22:55 +, Katherina Walshe-Grey via agora-
discussion wrote:
On Sun, 2025-01-26 at 22:16 +, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
Is the officeholder switch self-ratifying? At a quick glance over the
ruleset, I couldn't see a reason why it would be
Mischief wrote:
On 1/26/25 4:52 PM, Edward Murphy via agora-discussion wrote:
a) eir Agoran Birthdate (if known), otherwise
How do we legally resolve "if known"? Known to whom?
Maybe this... change it to Official Agoran Birthday (that way it doesn't
matter if it
On 1/31/25 9:10 PM, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
Ah, oops.
However, only 7 should have failed since I was transferred 4 spendies for that
CFJ whose number I can't look up right now.
-sigh- This is why we need a Spendor.
--
Mischief
Collector, Illuminator, Prime Ministe
Ah, oops.
However, only 7 should have failed since I was transferred 4 spendies for that
CFJ whose number I can't look up right now.
On 1/31/25 6:10 PM, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote:
Ten times, I pay a fee of two spendies to gain one radiance.
Janet Cobb
Nine of these failed
https://www.mail-archive.com/agora-business@agoranomic.org/msg47444.html
--
Mischief
Collector, Illuminator, Prime Minister
Hat: steampunk hat
On Sun, 2025-01-26 at 22:55 +, Katherina Walshe-Grey via agora-
discussion wrote:
> On Sun, 2025-01-26 at 22:16 +, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> > Is the officeholder switch self-ratifying? At a quick glance over the
> > ruleset, I couldn't see a reason why it
On Sun, 2025-01-26 at 22:16 +, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> Is the officeholder switch self-ratifying? At a quick glance over the
> ruleset, I couldn't see a reason why it would be, but maybe I'm missing
> something. (If it isn't, then of course an offici
On Sun, 2025-01-26 at 14:05 -0800, Edward Murphy via agora-discussion
wrote:
> I wrote:
>
> > =Metareport=
>
> > Office Holder[1] Since Last Election Complexity
> > --
On 1/26/25 4:52 PM, Edward Murphy via agora-discussion wrote:
a) eir Agoran Birthdate (if known), otherwise
How do we legally resolve "if known"? Known to whom?
Maybe this... change it to Official Agoran Birthday (that way it doesn't
matter if it's estim
I wrote:
=Metareport=
Office Holder[1] Since Last Election Complexity
Geologist *(vacant) 2025-01-15[2] 2024-09-15 [4] 1
Unofficial CoE: Geologist may have already b
alues null (default) and
all dates since Agora was created. If a player's Agoran Birthdate
is unknown, then e CAN, with Agoran consent, flip eir Estimated
Agoran Birthdate to a specified valid past date.
A player's Agoran Birthday is the anniversary of
Well I push it towards
——
Ben
From: agora-business on behalf of Owen
C via agora-business
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2025 11:12:28 PM
To: agora-busin...@agoranomic.org
Cc: Owen C
Subject: BUS: Boulder!
I push it backwards.
On 1/19/25 9:06 PM, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
What about contests? The most successful Agoran contests historically
seem to have been ones that work similar to proposal voting, in that
you get a batch of things to do every week, and can focus on them at
any point during the week
ais523 via agora-discussion [2025-01-20 02:06]:
> I feel like the secret to making online nomic gameplay work is to have
> something you can play in bursts, regardless of whether or not the
> other players are doing anything – when you feel ready to make a move,
> you can spend as much
the other players outcompeting you.
Agora has historically done this pretty well with its core rules-and-
proposals gameplay; in particular, achieving a win by scam or paradox
is generally a case of carefully studying the ruleset to look for
loopholes that might be exploitable, which is somethi
Janet wrote:
On 1/17/25 13:47, ais523 via agora-business wrote:
I call for judgement on the statement "If a player publicly quotes a
distribution of an Agoran decision on whether to adopt a proposl,
adding 'I vote AGAINT' immediately after the quote, this would
generally be i
On 1/17/25 1:47 PM, ais523 via agora-business wrote:
(Note: the CFJ appears earlier in this message than
these arguments do, so the judge should probably evaluate the CFJ as
though the argument are not publicly known, although I'm interested in
whether the mere fact of me posting
On 1/13/25 10:37 AM, 4st nomic via agora-discussion wrote:
So there there appears to be interest in goblins and gnomes, however,
ais523 has a point: this would potentially increase their workload
unreasonably. Could we modify the refs office to allow a similar system to
cfjs wherein noted
We've had a persistent lack of volunteers for Spendor. I'd be willing to
take it on, but I don't want to commit to three reporting offices
simultaneously. If someone is interested in Collector or Illuminator,
though, we could potentially pull off a bit of musical chairs to make
this work.
So there there appears to be interest in goblins and gnomes, however,
ais523 has a point: this would potentially increase their workload
unreasonably. Could we modify the refs office to allow a similar system to
cfjs wherein noted infractions can be investigated by a person of the refs
choice?
--
I push the boulder
I object to each intent to declare apathy
——
Ben
From: agora-business on behalf of
secretsnail9 via agora-business
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2025 8:29:04 PM
To: agora-busin...@agoranomic.org
Cc: secretsnail9
Subject: BUS: (@absurdor
On Tue, 2025-01-07 at 13:38 -0800, Owen C via agora-discussion wrote:
> I would like to sell my Automaticat rare stamp, along with a contract not
> to mint any more for a period of time and therefore to ensure it remains a
> rare stamp. Any takers?
Although I've historically been
On Sat, 2025-01-11 at 13:15 -0500, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> When we've considered this before (e.g. for coins, before boatloads were
> invented), people had written a bunch of contracts that would not handle
> assets being destroyed out from under them (their
On 1/11/25 13:41, Mischief via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 1/11/25 1:15 PM, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
>
>> When we've considered this before (e.g. for coins, before boatloads were
>> invented), people had written a bunch of contracts that would not handle
&g
On 1/11/25 1:15 PM, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
When we've considered this before (e.g. for coins, before boatloads were
invented), people had written a bunch of contracts that would not handle
assets being destroyed out from under them (their internal state
wouldn't m
On 1/11/25 13:13, Mischief via agora-discussion wrote:
>> AGAINST. This will make it far more difficult to implement taxation if
>> we ever decide that's something we're interested in.
> Why? We already can't use wording like "every player who owns X" for
On 1/11/25 12:50 PM, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote:
9206~ Mischief1.0 Let Contracts Own Stamps
AGAINST. This will make it far more difficult to implement taxation if
we ever decide that's something we're interested in.
Why? We already can't use word
On 1/11/25 13:08, Mischief via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 1/11/25 12:48 PM, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
>
>> Hmm. I think I'd argue that, regardless, people who are doing that are
>> not truly subscribed to the forum. For instance, if mail-archive went
>>
On 1/11/25 12:48 PM, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
Hmm. I think I'd argue that, regardless, people who are doing that are
not truly subscribed to the forum. For instance, if mail-archive went
down but the lists themselves stayed up, I don't think we'd accept that
the li
On 1/11/25 12:46, Katherina Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Sat, 2025-01-11 at 12:44 -0500, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>> On 1/11/25 12:42, Katherina Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2025-01-10 at 00:47 +0000, ais523 via
On Sat, 2025-01-11 at 12:44 -0500, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion
wrote:
> On 1/11/25 12:42, Katherina Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion wrote:
> > On Fri, 2025-01-10 at 00:47 +, ais523 via agora-business wrote:
> > > Gratuitous: I received a copy of this mess
On 1/11/25 12:42, Katherina Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Fri, 2025-01-10 at 00:47 +, ais523 via agora-business wrote:
>> Gratuitous: I received a copy of this message with only four ">"
>> characters (the relevant portion is quoted above), so it is
On Fri, 2025-01-10 at 00:47 +, ais523 via agora-business wrote:
> Gratuitous: I received a copy of this message with only four ">"
> characters (the relevant portion is quoted above), so it is at least
> possible for me to tell that the original had a line starting wit
Ah, i see. Also the No Faking wasn't related to spendies at all anyway,
which is what I thought had happened.
--
4st
putting jesters cap back on, it fell off while mobile
-- Forwarded message -
From: ais523 via agora-business
Date: Fri, Jan 10, 2025, 2:34 PM
Subject: Re
On 1/10/25 12:33, 4st nomic via agora-discussion wrote:
> Gratuitous: i see 6 >. And no one can prove otherwise. Therefore, take this
> as an argument for IRRELEVANT: the transfer is specifying an ambiguous
> number of spendies, and is therefor invalid.
Is that a true statement? You
ina Walshe-Grey via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> From x
> >From x
> >>From x
>
> I transfer to Janet a number of Spendies equal to the number of ">"
> characters in this message.
>
> CFJ: "I possess 16 Spendies."
ef139f68-d4c9-4c18-b408-575ea7a4dce7
From
>From
>>From
>From x
>From x
>>From x
I screwed up what I was trying to test the first time. Very sorry. I
hope this will be the last one.
I declare under penalty of No Faking that this message is not intended
as part of any scam or exploit.
~qenya
b0298f01-928c-4697-a3e4-ef011b6544d6
From
>From
>>From
Pardon the spam, I'm trying to debug a thing.
I declare under penalty of No Faking that this message is not intended
as part of any scam or exploit.
~qenya
On 1/8/25 11:14 AM, 4st nomic via agora-business wrote:
In case this comes back...
- Whenever a player wins the game, grant each Angel player 2 gnomes.
"Whenever one or more players win the game..."
Otherwise, a single group win can give every Angel player the ability to
win at
Understood, thanks.
On Wed, Jan 8, 2025, 12:48 PM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 1/8/25 15:44, Owen C via agora-business wrote:
> > I vote FOR both proposals here.
>
>
> You can't vote on these yet; they have to be &q
On 1/8/25 15:44, Owen C via agora-business wrote:
> I vote FOR both proposals here.
You can't vote on these yet; they have to be "distributed" by the
Promotor first. See [0] for an example.
[0]
https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-official/2024-De
On 1/8/25 11:14, 4st nomic via agora-business wrote:
> I am generally proposing an informal classification of rules, one that is
> clearly marked "DANGER", so that players may be aware that playing that
> subgame may come at a cost. With no risk, there is no reward.
>
&g
On Wed, 2025-01-08 at 08:14 -0800, 4st nomic via agora-business wrote:
> - Once per player per week by announcement, a feral goblin can be
> transferred to anything so long as that goblin becomes loyal by doing so.
> - Once per player per week by announcement, a goblin owned by the
On 1/8/25 1:39 AM, 4st nomic via agora-business wrote:
Infractions of this rule are class 4. The referee is ENCOURAGED to specify
the maximum number of blots for infractions related to goblins.
How does one violate this rule? An incorrect Goblin Rebellion
announcement just doesn'
On 1/7/25 4:34 PM, Owen C via agora-business wrote:
I transfer 1 Jackrabbit stamp to myself from the L&FD for 5 spendies
I transfer 1 Mercury stamp to myself from the L&FD for 6 spendies
Janet grabbed the last Jackrabbit stamp, so the first action fails. That
in turn caused th
I would like to sell my Automaticat rare stamp, along with a contract not
to mint any more for a period of time and therefore to ensure it remains a
rare stamp. Any takers?
On 1/5/25 18:18, Janet Cobb via agora-official wrote:
> Date of this ruleset: 5 Jan 2024
Correction: This should be 2025. As this doesn't self-ratify, I don't
see any point in publishing a revision. I will do my best to not make
this mistake in the future.
Same for the FLR.
-
I have no relation to them whatsoever.
On Sun, Jan 5, 2025, 12:54 PM Edward Murphy via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> Automaticat wrote:
>
> > I register as Automaticat, give myself a welcome package, and push the
> > boulder.
>
> W
Automaticat wrote:
I register as Automaticat, give myself a welcome package, and push the
boulder.
Welcome!
Are you the player previously nicknamed "o" (registered from 2016-2018
and 2019-2020), or is their e-mail address just somewhat similar?
--
[ANSC H:GE V:G B:0]
Mischief wrote:
1) the number of tickets held by each entity holding one or
more tickets (however, e NEED NOT list any such entities
who, as of the time the spin is resolved, are not
players);
"the number of tickets held by each play
Mischief via agora-business [2025-01-02 06:56]:
> > From: 4st nomic via agora-business
> > Date: Tue, Dec 31, 2024, 12:15 PM
> > Subject: BUS: (@absurdor) ???
> > To: Agora Business
> > Cc: 4st nomic <4st.no...@gmail.com>
> >
> > Unless it
On 1/2/25 6:59 AM, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
I'm worried that that the existence of a simple random game would have
a chilling effect on the creation of more skill-based games; players
have to choose where to spend their candles, and if a game with no
skill exists, then players
On 1/2/25 6:48 AM, Katherina Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion wrote:
Proto-proto-proposal: Officers CAN (and perhaps SHALL) issue Humiliating
Public Reminders when players violate SHOULDs in their Administrative
Regulations...
CAN isn't necessary unless HPRs are meant to have a spe
On Wed, 2025-01-01 at 21:19 -0500, Mischief via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 1/1/25 9:04 PM, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
>
> > I mean, that's certainly better, but I guess I was imagining some form
> > of skill being required. These were pitched as minigames o
On 1/2/25 1:39 AM, 4st nomic via agora-business wrote:
"At the beginning of each quarter, all crystals whose identity is not equal
to the ID of any rule in the current ruleset has its size increased by 3."
Instead of "...all crystals... has..." maybe "...any crysta
On Wed, 2025-01-01 at 21:02 -0500, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion
wrote:
> In any event, there's very clear game custom about this. [0] shows 83
> appearances of "quoted message" (as opposed to simply saying "this
> message" to refer to a quoted message), and pi
On 1/1/25 9:04 PM, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
I mean, that's certainly better, but I guess I was imagining some form
of skill being required. These were pitched as minigames or small
tournaments. I'll think about it, I guess (and it's moot if nobody else
would object
On 12/31/24 18:12, Mischief via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 12/31/24 5:55 PM, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
>
>> I think I would object to this on principle. My expectation was that
>> contests would be, well, contests, rather than arbitrage on the spendy
>> -
On 12/31/24 21:09, Mischief via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 12/31/24 6:41 PM, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote:
>
>> Gratuitous:
>>
>> This is trivially FALSE. "in this message" means the message in which
>> the CFJ was called.
> Ha, initially I did
On 12/31/24 6:41 PM, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote:
Gratuitous:
This is trivially FALSE. "in this message" means the message in which
the CFJ was called.
Ha, initially I didn't even catch that the first sentence is a
counterargument to the second.
The point being,
On 12/31/24 6:41 PM, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote:
Gratuitous:
"in this message" means the message in which
the CFJ was called.
This argument is not one I agree with.
--
Mischief
Collector, Illuminator, Prime Minister
Hat: steampunk hat
Vitality: alive
Bang holdings: 2
On 12/31/24 5:55 PM, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
I think I would object to this on principle. My expectation was that
contests would be, well, contests, rather than arbitrage on the spendy
-> candle conversion rate.
Even with the double risk element (risk that another particip
On 12/31/24 17:53, Mischief via agora-discussion wrote:
> Quick summary: players are better off -- in expectation, at least --
> gambling their excess spendies here than converting them directly to
> radiance, but there is also risk involved. Also, the Veblen might even
> affect
I posted a prior version of this to Discord earlier this month for some
initial feedback, but I wanted to give folks another chance to weigh in.
Because the amendment process is (deliberately) a bit cumbersome and
making it into a contest will require acting without 2 objections, I'd
rather
I’ll just push the boulder normally.
The previous sentence is a game action intended to push the boulder
——
Ben
From: agora-business on behalf of 4st
nomic via agora-business
Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2024 3:15:08 PM
To: Agora Business
Cc: 4st nomic <4st
ais523 wrote:
On Sat, 2024-12-28 at 21:01 -0800, Edward Murphy via agora-discussion wrote:
ais523 wrote:
So the message itself is sufficient indication of the person's
intentions, as far as I can tell. I don't think it's reasonable to
assume that someone might have intenti
ais523 wrote:
On Sat, 2024-12-28 at 21:01 -0800, Edward Murphy via agora-discussion wrote:
ais523 wrote:
(It is also worth noting that "an experienced player aiming for some
level of ambiguity" would also cause a registration: unambiguously
intending to ambiguously register still de
1 - 100 of 1220 matches
Mail list logo
