On Thu, 2025-02-06 at 07:16 -0500, Mischief via agora-discussion wrote: > On 2/5/25 1:02 PM, ais523 via agora-business wrote: > > On Wed, 2025-02-05 at 17:44 +0000, Katherina Walshe-Grey via agora- > > business wrote: > > > On Wed, 2025-02-05 at 02:16 -0600, secretsnail9 via agora- > > > official > > > wrote: > > > > 9211~ qenya, Mischief 1.7 De-Convoluting Mooting > > > > v1.1 > > > > 9212* Mischief 3.0 Incentives > > > > 9213~ Murphy 1.0 Twice the pride > > > > > > FOR, FOR, FOR. > > > > CFJ: qenya has submitted a valid ballot on each of the referenda on > > proposals 9211, 9212, and 9213. > > A possible precedent (even more puzzling because it seems to have one > more vote than there are proposals)... > > https://www.mail-archive.com/agora-business@agoranomic.org/msg27276.html > > https://www.mail-archive.com/agora-official@agoranomic.org/msg07605.html > > I didn't see any CFJ or discussion regarding it.
That one has to be Assessor error, I think – the message had four FORs, one AGAINST, and an AGAINT, but it was Assessed as three FORs and two AGAINSTs, which doesn't seem to fit the message at all. Perhaps the Assessor just miscounted. (It didn't make a difference to any of the results.) -- ais523
