On 1/10/25 12:33, 4st nomic via agora-discussion wrote: > Gratuitous: i see 6 >. And no one can prove otherwise. Therefore, take this > as an argument for IRRELEVANT: the transfer is specifying an ambiguous > number of spendies, and is therefor invalid.
Is that a true statement? You haven't sent this to the public forum. -- Janet Cobb Assessor, Rulekeepor
