On 12/31/24 17:53, Mischief via agora-discussion wrote: > Quick summary: players are better off -- in expectation, at least -- > gambling their excess spendies here than converting them directly to > radiance, but there is also risk involved. Also, the Veblen might even > affect the outcome! > > IV) D) is meant to cover taxes (if those ever arise again), adjustments > happening via proposals, scam effects, etc.
I think I would object to this on principle. My expectation was that contests would be, well, contests, rather than arbitrage on the spendy -> candle conversion rate. -- Janet Cobb Assessor, Rulekeepor
