On 2/5/25 12:53, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote: > On Wed, 2025-02-05 at 17:44 +0000, Katherina Walshe-Grey via agora- > business wrote: >> On Wed, 2025-02-05 at 02:16 -0600, secretsnail9 via agora-official >> wrote: >>> 9211~ qenya, Mischief 1.7 De-Convoluting Mooting v1.1 >>> 9212* Mischief 3.0 Incentives >>> 9213~ Murphy 1.0 Twice the pride >> FOR, FOR, FOR. > I'm intrigued as to whether this is a set of three valid votes or not – > R683p3 might not be complied with, but I'm not sure. Do we already have > a precedent about it, or is it worth calling a CFJ?
I'm not aware of any precedent, and I would appreciate a CFJ (or can call one myself later). -- Janet Cobb Assessor, Rulekeepor
