license-discuss  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [License-discuss] License Consistency Working Group, call for volunteers Josh Berkus
• [License-discuss] Network copyleft license without requiring 'Installation Information' Wiebe Cazemier
  • Re: [License-discuss] Network copyleft license without requiring 'Installation Information' Kevin P. Fleming
  • Re: [License-discuss] Network copyleft license without requiring 'Installation Information' Wiebe Cazemier
  • Re: [License-discuss] Network copyleft license without requiring 'Installation Information' McCoy Smith
  • Re: [License-discuss] Network copyleft license without requiring 'Installation Information' Wiebe Cazemier
  • Re: [License-discuss] Network copyleft license without requiring 'Installation Information' McCoy Smith
  • Re: [License-discuss] Network copyleft license without requiring 'Installation Information' Wiebe Cazemier
• [License-discuss] License pages cleanup project underway - status update Giulia Dellanoce
  • Re: [License-discuss] License pages cleanup project underway - status update Stefano Maffulli
  • Re: [License-discuss] License pages cleanup project underway - status update Richard Fontana
  • Re: [License-discuss] License pages cleanup project underway - status update Simon Phipps
• [License-discuss] License pages cleanup project underway Stefano Maffulli
  • Re: [License-discuss] License pages cleanup project underway Giulia Dellanoce
  • Re: [License-discuss] License pages cleanup project underway Richard Fontana
  • Re: [License-discuss] License pages cleanup project underway Stefano Maffulli
  • Re: [License-discuss] License pages cleanup project underway Richard Fontana
  • Re: [License-discuss] License pages cleanup project underway Stefano Maffulli
  • Re: [License-discuss] License pages cleanup project underway Aaron Williamson
  • Re: [License-discuss] License pages cleanup project underway Brian Behlendorf
  • Re: [License-discuss] License pages cleanup project underway McCoy Smith
• [License-discuss] The ambiguous scope of the Apache License 2.0 patent grant ygrex908 via License-discuss
  • Re: [License-discuss] The ambiguous scope of the Apache License 2.0 patent grant Kevin P. Fleming
  • Re: [License-discuss] The ambiguous scope of the Apache License 2.0 patent grant Nicholas Matthew Neft Weinstock
• [License-discuss] Reconsidering the "unless required by applicable law" clauses on warranties and limitations of liability Brian Behlendorf
  • Re: [License-discuss] Reconsidering the "unless required by applicable law" clauses on warranties and limitations of liability Thorsten Glaser
  • Re: [License-discuss] Reconsidering the "unless required by applicable law" clauses on warranties and limitations of liability Pamela Chestek
  • Re: [License-discuss] Reconsidering the "unless required by applicable law" clauses on warranties and limitations of liability Brian Behlendorf
  • Re: [License-discuss] Reconsidering the "unless required by applicable law" clauses on warranties and limitations of liability Thorsten Glaser
  • Re: [License-discuss] Reconsidering the "unless required by applicable law" clauses on warranties and limitations of liability Brian Behlendorf
  • Re: [License-discuss] Reconsidering the "unless required by applicable law" clauses on warranties and limitations of liability Mike Milinkovich
  • Re: [License-discuss] Reconsidering the "unless required by applicable law" clauses on warranties and limitations of liability (CRA) JBC offsite
  • Re: [License-discuss] Reconsidering the "unless required by applicable law" clauses on warranties and limitations of liability David Woolley
  • Re: [License-discuss] Reconsidering the "unless required by applicable law" clauses on warranties and limitations of liability Mike Milinkovich
• [License-discuss] License Review working group asks for community input on its recommendations Pamela Chestek
  • Re: [License-discuss] License Review working group asks for community input on its recommendations Bruce Perens via License-discuss
  • Re: [License-discuss] License Review working group asks for community input on its recommendations Pamela Chestek
  • Re: [License-discuss] License Review working group asks for community input on its recommendations Bruce Perens via License-discuss
  • Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] License Review working group asks for community input on its recommendations Josh Berkus
  • Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] License Review working group asks for community input on its recommendations Pamela Chestek
• Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] Final comment on Open Logistics License (was Re: For Approval: Open Logistics License v1.2) Pamela Chestek
• Re: [License-discuss] in opposition of 'choice of law' provisions in FOSS licenses Pamela Chestek
• [License-discuss] Retroactively disapproving licenses Lawrence Rosen
  • Re: [License-discuss] Retroactively disapproving licenses Bruce Perens via License-discuss
  • Re: [License-discuss] Retroactively disapproving licenses McCoy Smith
  • Re: [License-discuss] Retroactively disapproving licenses Pamela Chestek
  • Re: [License-discuss] Retroactively disapproving licenses McCoy Smith
  • Re: [License-discuss] Retroactively disapproving licenses Chris DiBona
  • Re: [License-discuss] Retroactively disapproving licenses Pamela Chestek
  • Re: [License-discuss] Retroactively disapproving licenses Nicholas Matthew Neft Weinstock
  • Re: [License-discuss] Retroactively disapproving licenses Bradley M. Kuhn
  • Re: [License-discuss] Retroactively disapproving licenses Myrle Krantz
  • Re: [License-discuss] Retroactively disapproving licenses McCoy Smith
  • Re: [License-discuss] Retroactively disapproving licenses Marc Jones
  • Re: [License-discuss] Retroactively disapproving licenses Bruce Perens via License-discuss
  • Re: [License-discuss] Retroactively disapproving licenses Russell Nelson
• Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] in opposition of 'choice of law' provisions in FOSS licenses (was: For Approval: Open Logistics License v1.2) Richard Fontana
  • Re: [License-discuss] in opposition of 'choice of law' provisions in FOSS licenses Bradley M. Kuhn
  • Re: [License-discuss] in opposition of 'choice of law' provisions in FOSS licenses Richard Fontana
  • Re: [License-discuss] in opposition of 'choice of law' provisions in FOSS licenses Bradley M. Kuhn
  • Re: [License-discuss] in opposition of 'choice of law' provisions in FOSS licenses Pamela Chestek
  • Re: [License-discuss] in opposition of 'choice of law' provisions in FOSS licenses Bradley M. Kuhn
  • Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] in opposition of 'choice of law' provisions in FOSS licenses (was: For Approval: Open Logistics License v1.2) Bruce Perens via License-discuss
  • Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] in opposition of 'choice of law' provisions in FOSS licenses (was: For Approval: Open Logistics License v1.2) Mike Milinkovich
  • Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] in opposition of 'choice of law' provisions in FOSS licenses (was: For Approval: Open Logistics License v1.2) Lawrence Rosen
  • Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] in opposition of 'choice of law' provisions in FOSS licenses (was: For Approval: Open Logistics License v1.2) Lawrence Rosen
  • Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] in opposition of 'choice of law' provisions in FOSS licenses (was: For Approval: Open Logistics License v1.2) Patrice-Emmanuel Schmitz via License-discuss
  • Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] in opposition of 'choice of law' provisions in FOSS licenses (was: For Approval: Open Logistics License v1.2) David Woolley
  • Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] in opposition of 'choice of law' provisions in FOSS licenses (was: For Approval: Open Logistics License v1.2) Patrice-Emmanuel Schmitz via License-discuss
  • Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] in opposition of 'choice of law' provisions in FOSS licenses (was: For Approval: Open Logistics License v1.2) David Woolley
  • Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] in opposition of 'choice of law' provisions in FOSS licenses (was: For Approval: Open Logistics License v1.2) van de Westelaken Janneke (C/LSC-IPL2) via License-discuss
• [License-discuss] Clarity on Licensing for SaaS Bryan Masterson
  • Re: [License-discuss] Clarity on Licensing for SaaS Kevin P. Fleming
  • Re: [License-discuss] Clarity on Licensing for SaaS Thorsten Glaser
• [License-discuss] Does the LinShare "attribution" notice violate OSD? Josh Berkus
  • Re: [License-discuss] Does the LinShare "attribution" notice violate OSD? Simon Phipps
  • Re: [License-discuss] Does the LinShare "attribution" notice violate OSD? Pamela Chestek
  • Re: [License-discuss] Does the LinShare "attribution" notice violate OSD? Thorsten Glaser
  • Re: [License-discuss] Does the LinShare "attribution" notice violate OSD? Pamela Chestek
  • Re: [License-discuss] Does the LinShare "attribution" notice violate OSD? Thorsten Glaser
  • Re: [License-discuss] Does the LinShare "attribution" notice violate OSD? Bruce Perens via License-discuss
  • Re: [License-discuss] Does the LinShare "attribution" notice violate OSD? Thorsten Glaser
  • Re: [License-discuss] Does the LinShare "attribution" notice violate OSD? Bruce Perens via License-discuss
  • Re: [License-discuss] Does the LinShare "attribution" notice violate OSD? McCoy Smith
  • Re: [License-discuss] Does the LinShare "attribution" notice violate OSD? Stefano Zacchiroli
  • Re: [License-discuss] Does the LinShare "attribution" notice violate OSD? Simon Phipps
  • Re: [License-discuss] Does the LinShare "attribution" notice violate OSD? McCoy Smith
  • Re: [License-discuss] Does the LinShare "attribution" notice violate OSD? Simon Phipps
  • Re: [License-discuss] Does the LinShare "attribution" notice violate OSD? McCoy Smith
  • Re: [License-discuss] Does the LinShare "attribution" notice violate OSD? Bradley M. Kuhn
  • Re: [License-discuss] Does the LinShare "attribution" notice violate OSD? Florian Weimer
  • Re: [License-discuss] Does the LinShare "attribution" notice violate OSD? Stefano Zacchiroli
  • Re: [License-discuss] Does the LinShare "attribution" notice violate OSD? Bradley M. Kuhn
  • Re: [License-discuss] Does the LinShare "attribution" notice violate OSD? Florian Weimer
  • Re: [License-discuss] Does the LinShare "attribution" notice violate OSD? Bradley M. Kuhn
  • Re: [License-discuss] Does the LinShare "attribution" notice violate OSD? Pamela Chestek
  • Re: [License-discuss] Does the LinShare "attribution" notice violate OSD? Bruce Perens via License-discuss
• [License-discuss] For Discussion: Open Logistics License v1.1 Andreas Nettsträter
  • Re: [License-discuss] For Discussion: Open Logistics License v1.1 Andreas Nettsträter
  • Re: [License-discuss] For Discussion: Open Logistics License v1.1 McCoy Smith
  • Re: [License-discuss] For Discussion: Open Logistics License v1.1 Andreas Nettsträter
  • Re: [License-discuss] For Discussion: Open Logistics License v1.1 Andreas Nettsträter
  • Re: [License-discuss] For Discussion: Open Logistics License v1.1 Andreas Nettsträter
• [License-discuss] Question about AGPLv3 with a Plugin Exception Joel Kelley
  • Re: [License-discuss] Question about AGPLv3 with a Plugin Exception McCoy Smith
  • Re: [License-discuss] Question about AGPLv3 with a Plugin Exception Kevin P. Fleming
  • Re: [License-discuss] Question about AGPLv3 with a Plugin Exception Lawrence Rosen
  • Re: [License-discuss] Question about AGPLv3 with a Plugin Exception Bradley M. Kuhn
  • Re: [License-discuss] Question about AGPLv3 with a Plugin Exception McCoy Smith
  • Re: [License-discuss] Question about AGPLv3 with a Plugin Exception Bradley M. Kuhn
  • Re: [License-discuss] Question about AGPLv3 with a Plugin Exception Bruce Perens via License-discuss
  • Re: [License-discuss] Question about AGPLv3 with a Plugin Exception Joel Kelley
  • Re: [License-discuss] Question about AGPLv3 with a Plugin Exception Josh Berkus
  • Re: [License-discuss] Question about AGPLv3 with a Plugin Exception Thorsten Glaser
  • Re: [License-discuss] Question about AGPLv3 with a Plugin Exception Bradley M. Kuhn
  • Re: [License-discuss] Question about AGPLv3 with a Plugin Exception Ben Tilly
  • Re: [License-discuss] Question about AGPLv3 with a Plugin Exception Bruce Perens via License-discuss
• [License-discuss] Fwd: Should fork a project on github be seen as distribution of origin project? なつよるほたる
  • Re: [License-discuss] Fwd: Should fork a project on github be seen as distribution of origin project? Ben Tilly
  • Re: [License-discuss] Fwd: Should fork a project on github be seen as distribution of origin project? Roland Turner via License-discuss
  • Re: [License-discuss] Fwd: Should fork a project on github be seen as distribution of origin project? Bruce Perens via License-discuss
  • Re: [License-discuss] Fwd: Should fork a project on github be seen as distribution of origin project? Alex Rousskov
  • Re: [License-discuss] Fwd: Should fork a project on github be seen as distribution of origin project? Josh Berkus
  • Re: [License-discuss] Fwd: Should fork a project on github be seen as distribution of origin project? Thorsten Glaser
  • Re: [License-discuss] Fwd: Should fork a project on github be seen as distribution of origin project? Bruce Perens via License-discuss
• [License-discuss] McCoy Smith, GNOME, and RPI patent article Christopher Sean Morrison via License-discuss
• [License-discuss] MIT License with mandatory arbitration? Michael Downey
  • Re: [License-discuss] MIT License with mandatory arbitration? McCoy Smith
• [License-discuss] Consumer protection, defective product Dirk RIEHLE
  • Re: [License-discuss] Consumer protection, defective product Roland Turner via License-discuss
  • Re: [License-discuss] Consumer protection, defective product Pamela Chestek
  • Re: [License-discuss] Consumer protection, defective product Bradley M. Kuhn
• [License-discuss] Status of earlier AFL licenses? VM (Vicky) Brasseur
  • Re: [License-discuss] Status of earlier AFL licenses? McCoy Smith
  • Re: [License-discuss] Status of earlier AFL licenses? Lawrence Rosen
  • Re: [License-discuss] Status of earlier AFL licenses? McCoy Smith
  • Re: [License-discuss] Status of earlier AFL licenses? VM (Vicky) Brasseur
  • Re: [License-discuss] Status of earlier AFL licenses? McCoy Smith
  • Re: [License-discuss] Status of earlier AFL licenses? Kevin P. Fleming
  • Re: [License-discuss] Status of earlier AFL licenses? McCoy Smith
  • Re: [License-discuss] Status of earlier AFL licenses? VM (Vicky) Brasseur
  • Re: [License-discuss] Status of earlier AFL licenses? Sebastian Crane
  • Re: [License-discuss] Status of earlier AFL licenses? Lawrence Rosen
  • Re: [License-discuss] Status of earlier AFL licenses? VM (Vicky) Brasseur
  • Re: [License-discuss] Status of earlier AFL licenses? Bruce Perens via License-discuss
• [License-discuss] OSI as guarantor for "or later" *GPL clauses Enrico Zini
  • Re: [License-discuss] OSI as guarantor for "or later" *GPL clauses Patrice-Emmanuel Schmitz via License-discuss
  • Re: [License-discuss] OSI as guarantor for "or later" *GPL clauses Enrico Zini
  • Re: [License-discuss] OSI as guarantor for "or later" *GPL clauses Enrico Zini
  • Re: [License-discuss] OSI as guarantor for "or later" *GPL clauses Andrew DeMarsh
  • Re: [License-discuss] OSI as guarantor for "or later" *GPL clauses Enrico Zini
  • Re: [License-discuss] OSI as guarantor for "or later" *GPL clauses Roland Turner via License-discuss
  • Re: [License-discuss] OSI as guarantor for "or later" *GPL clauses Dirk RIEHLE
  • Re: [License-discuss] OSI as guarantor for "or later" *GPL clauses Pamela Chestek
• [License-discuss] License of open source licenses (the legal texts)? Dirk RIEHLE
  • Re: [License-discuss] License of open source licenses (the legal texts)? Richard Fontana
  • Re: [License-discuss] License of open source licenses (the legal texts)? Dirk RIEHLE
• [License-discuss] Who is the user in 6. b), LGPL v2.1 Yamada Yoshi
  • Re: [License-discuss] Who is the user in 6. b), LGPL v2.1 Johnny A. Solbu
  • Re: [License-discuss] Who is the user in 6. b), LGPL v2.1 Yamada Yoshi
  • Re: [License-discuss] Who is the user in 6. b), LGPL v2.1 VM (Vicky) Brasseur
• Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] request for review of the 3D Slicer License Lawrence Rosen
  • Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] request for review of the 3D Slicer License Lawrence Rosen
  • Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] request for review of the 3D Slicer License Lawrence Rosen
• Re: [License-discuss] License-discuss Digest, Vol 106, Issue 8 Gustavo G . Mármol
• [License-discuss] Google v. Oracle Lawrence Rosen
  • Re: [License-discuss] Google v. Oracle Pamela Chestek
  • Re: [License-discuss] Google v. Oracle Patrice-Emmanuel Schmitz via License-discuss
  • Re: [License-discuss] Google v. Oracle Pamela Chestek
  • Re: [License-discuss] Google v. Oracle McCoy Smith
  • Re: [License-discuss] Google v. Oracle Richard Fontana
• [License-discuss] Database of all licenses? James
  • Re: [License-discuss] Database of all licenses? Kevin P. Fleming
• [License-discuss] Google wins Lawrence Rosen
  • Re: [License-discuss] Google wins Ben Tilly
  • Re: [License-discuss] Google wins dmg
• Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] Please rename "Free Public License-1.0.0" to 0BSD... again. Rob Landley
  • Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] Please rename "Free Public License-1.0.0" to 0BSD... again. Richard Fontana
  • Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] Please rename "Free Public License-1.0.0" to 0BSD... again. Rob Landley
  • Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] Please rename "Free Public License-1.0.0" to 0BSD... again. Christopher Sean Morrison via License-discuss
  • Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] Please rename "Free Public License-1.0.0" to 0BSD... again. Pamela Chestek
  • Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] Please rename "Free Public License-1.0.0" to 0BSD... again. McCoy Smith
  • Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] Please rename "Free Public License-1.0.0" to 0BSD... again. Rob Landley
  • Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] Please rename "Free Public License-1.0.0" to 0BSD... again. McCoy Smith
  • Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] Please rename "Free Public License-1.0.0" to 0BSD... again. Nigel T
  • Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] Please rename "Free Public License-1.0.0" to 0BSD... again. Josh Berkus
  • Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] Please rename "Free Public License-1.0.0" to 0BSD... again. Nigel T
  • Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] Please rename "Free Public License-1.0.0" to 0BSD... again. McCoy Smith
  • Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] Please rename "Free Public License-1.0.0" to 0BSD... again. Josh Berkus
• [License-discuss] MIT license difference between X.org, SPDX and OSI Keith Packard via License-discuss
  • Re: [License-discuss] MIT license difference between X.org, SPDX and OSI Sebastian Crane
• [License-discuss] Legal use of software Lawrence Rosen
• [License-discuss] Does GeoGebra meet the Open Source Definition? robert . pollak
  • Re: [License-discuss] Does GeoGebra meet the Open Source Definition? Thorsten Glaser
• [License-discuss] Question about Python 2.0 license Candice Wright
  • Re: [License-discuss] Question about Python 2.0 license Gregor Hoffleit
  • Re: [License-discuss] Question about Python 2.0 license Candice Wright
  • Re: [License-discuss] Question about Python 2.0 license Gregor Hoffleit
  • Re: [License-discuss] Question about Python 2.0 license Candice Wright
• Re: [License-discuss] License-discuss Digest, Vol 104, Issue 4 Gustavo G . Mármol

• Earlier messages
• Later messages