On 4/6/21 2:25 PM, McCoy Smith wrote: > You get the idea. > I don’t see the harm in saying something like "this license was submitted and > approved as the Free Public License 1.0.0 but is more now commonly referred > to as 0BSD and is now referred to on this list (and SPDX) as 0BSD, but may > still be used by some under its original submission name." or something like > that.
Yes, and it should still be indexed as the FPL, in case someone wants to look that up. Which is ... kinda the situation we already have. -- Josh Berkus _______________________________________________ The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Official statements by the Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address. License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@lists.opensource.org http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
