Just a candid question from someone that has not closely followed the case. The case moved from patent infringement (original claim in 2010) to copyright infringement: 1) are API copyrightable 2) was their use fair or not? The second question only was answered by the Supreme Court. Did someone check the case according to the free software permissions granted by the library license (GPL-2.0 I presume)? Patrice-Emmanuel
Le sam. 24 avr. 2021 à 22:16, Lawrence Rosen <lro...@rosenlaw.com> a écrit : > To: OSI License Discuss > > > > For those of you interested in the details of the Google v. Oracle case > and the arguments raised by the lawyers and the Supreme Court, this is an > excellent 1-hour summary: > > > > https://youtu.be/BDLTOwoSRNg > > > > There is a 1-hour CLE credit if you want it. Please enjoy. /Larry > > > > Lawrence Rosen > > 707-478-8932 > > 3001 King Ranch Rd., Ukiah, CA 95482 > _______________________________________________ > The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not > necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Official statements by the > Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address. > > License-discuss mailing list > License-discuss@lists.opensource.org > > http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org > -- Patrice-Emmanuel Schmitz pe.schm...@gmail.com tel. + 32 478 50 40 65
_______________________________________________ The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Official statements by the Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address. License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@lists.opensource.org http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
