Nicholas Matthew Neft Weinstock of Qualcomm wrote: > Without commenting on WHETHER any licenses should be > deprecated/disapproved/legacy, nor on WHICH licenses are appropriate > candidates, I would like to suggest a consideration related to HOW to do > so.
+1 (… and this may be the first time in my entire life I've ever agreed with Qualcomm about anything, so that's saying something … ☺) -- bkuhn _______________________________________________ The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Official statements by the Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address. License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@lists.opensource.org http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
