On the CRA, Mike was gracious enough to note in his first blog post
that, while Eclipse and a few other big shops might be able to
metabolize the overhead of all the
conformity/safety-testing-and-certifying that a regulatory regime
might impose ... most FOSS shops could not.  But as he also notes,
this EU proposal probably comes from a place of good will:  it's not a
deliberate attack on noncommercial / indie code development.  In case
this didn't get mentioned in the thread, there's more of a discussion
of this ongoing legislative issue in Open Forum Europe channels.   
Jamie usually from OASIS but personal views only here.
On 2/23/2023 at 2:39 PM, "Mike Milinkovich"  wrote:                  
On 2023-02-20 1:36 p.m., Brian       Behlendorf wrote:
          On       Sat, 18 Feb 2023, Thorsten Glaser wrote:       
       What is a CRA?         Assuming you don’t means clan
restoration act here…         
       Cyber Resiliency Act, the prompt for this thread:       
      
https://eclipse-foundation.blog/2023/01/15/european-cyber-resiliency-act-potential-impact-on-the-eclipse-foundation/
    

        For those who are interested in this topic, I've written a        
second blog post[1] on the unintended consequences of the       Cyber
Resilience Act. 
        I have also recently come to realize that the CRA needs to      
understood as a companion piece to the revised       Product        
Liability Directive[2][3]. AIUI the CRA is the legislation       that
makes the open source community _responsible _for the       CE Mark
validation for all of its software, and it is the PLD that       makes
the open source community _liable _for any defects. 
        I cannot stress enough how damaging these soon-to-be laws are to     
 the future viability of open source as we know it. 
        [1]
https://eclipse-foundation.blog/2023/02/23/cyber-resilience-act-good-intentions-and-unintended-consequences/
       [2]
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2023/739341/EPRS_BRI(2023)739341_EN.pdf
       [3]
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52022PC0495&from=EN
         
_______________________________________________
The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not 
necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Official statements by the 
Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address.

License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@lists.opensource.org
http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org

Reply via email to