Thanks Bruce. If you could add your comment on the wiki, that would be very helpful. We're trying to have just one feedback channel for comments.

Pam

Pamela Chestek
Chair, License Committee
Open Source Initiative

On 1/26/2023 10:09 PM, Bruce Perens via License-discuss wrote:
> The license does not have terms that structurally put the licensor in a more favored position than any licensee.

Please use "must". Does is like "shall". This is one of a zillion references on why not to use "shall": https://www.isba.org/barnews/2009/11/25/must-vs-shall

On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 6:12 PM Pamela Chestek <pamela.ches...@opensource.org> wrote:

    Hi all,

    The OSI has now posted the recommendations of the License Review
    Working
    Group. The blog post is at
    
https://blog.opensource.org/the-license-review-working-group-asks-for-community-input-on-its-recommendations/,

    with a wiki version available for comments.
    
https://wiki.opensource.org/bin/Working%20Groups%20%26%20Incubator%20Projects/License%20Review/#

    Comments will be open on the wiki for four months to allow adequate
    time. The OSI will also have a session in the Legal and Policy Issues
    Dev Room at FOSDEM,
    https://fosdem.org/2023/schedule/event/license_review/

    Looking forward to all of your comments and insight.

    Pamela Chestek
    Chair, License Committee
    Open Source Initiative

    _______________________________________________
    The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and
    not necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Official
    statements by the Open Source Initiative will be sent from an
    opensource.org <http://opensource.org> email address.

    License-discuss mailing list
    License-discuss@lists.opensource.org
    
http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org



--
Bruce Perens K6BP

_______________________________________________
The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not 
necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Official statements by the 
Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address.

License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@lists.opensource.org
http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
_______________________________________________
The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not 
necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Official statements by the 
Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address.

License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@lists.opensource.org
http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org

Reply via email to