> -----Original Message----- > From: Nigel T <nigel.2...@gmail.com> > Sent: Tuesday, April 6, 2021 1:52 PM > To: License-discuss@lists.opensource.org > Cc: mc...@lexpan.law > Subject: Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] Please rename "Free Public > License-1.0.0" to 0BSD... again. > > There would then be no ambiguity that 0BSD is the only name in use, that FPL > was what it was submitted under for OSI in the unlikely scenario someone > wants to see the approval discussion and that FPL no longer should be used > on new projects to avoid confusion. > Well, except here: https://tldrlegal.com/license/free-public-license-1.0.0 And here: https://github.com/jmickle66666666/DoomUnity And here: https://github.com/bidachon/PluginManager And here: https://github.com/fraction/set-timer/blob/master/LICENSE
You get the idea. I don’t see the harm in saying something like "this license was submitted and approved as the Free Public License 1.0.0 but is more now commonly referred to as 0BSD and is now referred to on this list (and SPDX) as 0BSD, but may still be used by some under its original submission name." or something like that. _______________________________________________ The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Official statements by the Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address. License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@lists.opensource.org http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
