You also may want to check out the “Additional Permission” excepting licensees from having to comply with the Installation Information requirement (in GPLv3) that the Canola project did about 15 years ago, discussed here:
https://www.linuxfoundation.org/blog/blog/canola-projectaos-gplv3-permissions-are-worth-a-look From: License-discuss <license-discuss-boun...@lists.opensource.org> On Behalf Of Wiebe Cazemier Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2023 4:05 PM To: license-discuss@lists.opensource.org Subject: Re: [License-discuss] Network copyleft license without requiring 'Installation Information' _____ From: "McCoy Smith" <mc...@lexpan.law <mailto:mc...@lexpan.law> > To: license-discuss@lists.opensource.org <mailto:license-discuss@lists.opensource.org> Sent: Tuesday, 23 May, 2023 20:41:00 Subject: Re: [License-discuss] Network copyleft license without requiring 'Installation Information' On May 22, 2023, at 3:19 AM, Wiebe Cazemier <wi...@flashmq.org <mailto:wi...@flashmq.org> > wrote: Or, is there simply an existing alternative? Regards, Wiebe There is at least one OSI license that fits your criteria: <https://opensource.org/license/osl-3-0-php/> The Open Software License 3.0 (OSL-3.0) <https://opensource.org/license/osl-3-0-php/> opensource.org See Sec 5 Thanks, I'll check it out.
_______________________________________________ The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Official statements by the Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address. License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@lists.opensource.org http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
