> From: "McCoy Smith" <mc...@lexpan.law> > To: license-discuss@lists.opensource.org > Sent: Wednesday, 24 May, 2023 09:29:44 > Subject: Re: [License-discuss] Network copyleft license without requiring > 'Installation Information'
> You also may want to check out the “Additional Permission” excepting licensees > from having to comply with the Installation Information requirement (in GPLv3) > that the Canola project did about 15 years ago, discussed here: > [ > https://www.linuxfoundation.org/blog/blog/canola-projectaos-gplv3-permissions-are-worth-a-look > | > https://www.linuxfoundation.org/blog/blog/canola-projectaos-gplv3-permissions-are-worth-a-look > ] Interesting. At least that gives me tested text. I had drafted one myself (but better to use a tested one): Additional permission under GNU AGPL version 3 section 7: The licensors of this Program grant you additional permission to convey an object code version of this Program in a User Product without providing Installation Information.
_______________________________________________ The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Official statements by the Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address. License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@lists.opensource.org http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
