Messages by Date
-
2023/06/26
Re: [License-discuss] License Consistency Working Group, call for volunteers
Thorsten Glaser
-
2023/06/26
Re: [License-discuss] License Consistency Working Group, call for volunteers
Kevin P. Fleming
-
2023/06/26
Re: [License-discuss] License Consistency Working Group, call for volunteers
Josh Berkus
-
2023/06/26
Re: [License-discuss] License Consistency Working Group, call for volunteers
Kevin P. Fleming
-
2023/06/26
[License-discuss] License Consistency Working Group, call for volunteers
Josh Berkus
-
2023/05/23
Re: [License-discuss] Network copyleft license without requiring 'Installation Information'
Wiebe Cazemier
-
2023/05/23
Re: [License-discuss] Network copyleft license without requiring 'Installation Information'
McCoy Smith
-
2023/05/23
Re: [License-discuss] Network copyleft license without requiring 'Installation Information'
Wiebe Cazemier
-
2023/05/23
Re: [License-discuss] Network copyleft license without requiring 'Installation Information'
Wiebe Cazemier
-
2023/05/23
Re: [License-discuss] Network copyleft license without requiring 'Installation Information'
McCoy Smith
-
2023/05/23
Re: [License-discuss] Network copyleft license without requiring 'Installation Information'
Kevin P. Fleming
-
2023/05/22
[License-discuss] Network copyleft license without requiring 'Installation Information'
Wiebe Cazemier
-
2023/04/27
[License-discuss] License pages cleanup project underway - status update
Giulia Dellanoce
-
2023/04/06
Re: [License-discuss] License pages cleanup project underway
Aaron Williamson
-
2023/04/05
Re: [License-discuss] License pages cleanup project underway
McCoy Smith
-
2023/04/05
Re: [License-discuss] License pages cleanup project underway
Stefano Maffulli
-
2023/04/04
Re: [License-discuss] License pages cleanup project underway
Brian Behlendorf
-
2023/04/04
Re: [License-discuss] License pages cleanup project underway
Richard Fontana
-
2023/04/04
Re: [License-discuss] License pages cleanup project underway
Stefano Maffulli
-
2023/04/03
Re: [License-discuss] License pages cleanup project underway
Richard Fontana
-
2023/04/03
Re: [License-discuss] License pages cleanup project underway
Giulia Dellanoce
-
2023/03/31
[License-discuss] License pages cleanup project underway
Stefano Maffulli
-
2023/03/13
Re: [License-discuss] Reconsidering the "unless required by applicable law" clauses on warranties and limitations of liability
Mike Milinkovich
-
2023/03/07
Re: [License-discuss] The ambiguous scope of the Apache License 2.0 patent grant
Nicholas Matthew Neft Weinstock
-
2023/03/07
Re: [License-discuss] The ambiguous scope of the Apache License 2.0 patent grant
Kevin P. Fleming
-
2023/02/23
Re: [License-discuss] Reconsidering the "unless required by applicable law" clauses on warranties and limitations of liability (CRA)
JBC offsite
-
2023/02/23
Re: [License-discuss] Reconsidering the "unless required by applicable law" clauses on warranties and limitations of liability
Mike Milinkovich
-
2023/02/20
Re: [License-discuss] Reconsidering the "unless required by applicable law" clauses on warranties and limitations of liability
Brian Behlendorf
-
2023/02/18
Re: [License-discuss] Reconsidering the "unless required by applicable law" clauses on warranties and limitations of liability
David Woolley
-
2023/02/18
Re: [License-discuss] Reconsidering the "unless required by applicable law" clauses on warranties and limitations of liability
Thorsten Glaser
-
2023/02/18
Re: [License-discuss] Reconsidering the "unless required by applicable law" clauses on warranties and limitations of liability
Brian Behlendorf
-
2023/02/18
Re: [License-discuss] Reconsidering the "unless required by applicable law" clauses on warranties and limitations of liability
Pamela Chestek
-
2023/02/17
Re: [License-discuss] Reconsidering the "unless required by applicable law" clauses on warranties and limitations of liability
Thorsten Glaser
-
2023/02/17
[License-discuss] The ambiguous scope of the Apache License 2.0 patent grant
ygrex908 via License-discuss
-
2023/02/17
[License-discuss] Reconsidering the "unless required by applicable law" clauses on warranties and limitations of liability
Brian Behlendorf
-
2023/01/28
Re: [License-discuss] License Review working group asks for community input on its recommendations
Bruce Perens via License-discuss
-
2023/01/27
Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] License Review working group asks for community input on its recommendations
Pamela Chestek
-
2023/01/27
Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] License Review working group asks for community input on its recommendations
Josh Berkus
-
2023/01/27
Re: [License-discuss] License Review working group asks for community input on its recommendations
Pamela Chestek
-
2023/01/27
Re: [License-discuss] License Review working group asks for community input on its recommendations
Bruce Perens via License-discuss
-
2023/01/26
[License-discuss] License Review working group asks for community input on its recommendations
Pamela Chestek
-
2022/12/23
Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] in opposition of 'choice of law' provisions in FOSS licenses (was: For Approval: Open Logistics License v1.2)
van de Westelaken Janneke (C/LSC-IPL2) via License-discuss
-
2022/12/22
Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] in opposition of 'choice of law' provisions in FOSS licenses (was: For Approval: Open Logistics License v1.2)
Bruce Perens via License-discuss
-
2022/12/21
Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] in opposition of 'choice of law' provisions in FOSS licenses (was: For Approval: Open Logistics License v1.2)
David Woolley
-
2022/12/21
Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] in opposition of 'choice of law' provisions in FOSS licenses (was: For Approval: Open Logistics License v1.2)
Patrice-Emmanuel Schmitz via License-discuss
-
2022/12/21
Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] in opposition of 'choice of law' provisions in FOSS licenses (was: For Approval: Open Logistics License v1.2)
David Woolley
-
2022/12/21
Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] in opposition of 'choice of law' provisions in FOSS licenses (was: For Approval: Open Logistics License v1.2)
Patrice-Emmanuel Schmitz via License-discuss
-
2022/12/17
Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] in opposition of 'choice of law' provisions in FOSS licenses (was: For Approval: Open Logistics License v1.2)
Lawrence Rosen
-
2022/12/16
Re: [License-discuss] Retroactively disapproving licenses
Myrle Krantz
-
2022/12/16
Re: [License-discuss] Retroactively disapproving licenses
Bruce Perens via License-discuss
-
2022/12/16
Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] in opposition of 'choice of law' provisions in FOSS licenses (was: For Approval: Open Logistics License v1.2)
Lawrence Rosen
-
2022/12/15
Re: [License-discuss] Retroactively disapproving licenses
Marc Jones
-
2022/12/15
Re: [License-discuss] Retroactively disapproving licenses
Russell Nelson
-
2022/12/15
Re: [License-discuss] Retroactively disapproving licenses
McCoy Smith
-
2022/12/15
Re: [License-discuss] Retroactively disapproving licenses
Bradley M. Kuhn
-
2022/12/15
Re: [License-discuss] Retroactively disapproving licenses
Nicholas Matthew Neft Weinstock
-
2022/12/15
Re: [License-discuss] in opposition of 'choice of law' provisions in FOSS licenses
Bradley M. Kuhn
-
2022/12/14
Re: [License-discuss] Retroactively disapproving licenses
Pamela Chestek
-
2022/12/14
Re: [License-discuss] Retroactively disapproving licenses
Chris DiBona
-
2022/12/14
Re: [License-discuss] Retroactively disapproving licenses
McCoy Smith
-
2022/12/14
Re: [License-discuss] Retroactively disapproving licenses
Pamela Chestek
-
2022/12/14
Re: [License-discuss] Retroactively disapproving licenses
McCoy Smith
-
2022/12/14
Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] in opposition of 'choice of law' provisions in FOSS licenses (was: For Approval: Open Logistics License v1.2)
Mike Milinkovich
-
2022/12/14
Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] Final comment on Open Logistics License (was Re: For Approval: Open Logistics License v1.2)
Pamela Chestek
-
2022/12/14
Re: [License-discuss] in opposition of 'choice of law' provisions in FOSS licenses
Pamela Chestek
-
2022/12/14
Re: [License-discuss] Retroactively disapproving licenses
Bruce Perens via License-discuss
-
2022/12/14
Re: [License-discuss] in opposition of 'choice of law' provisions in FOSS licenses
Bradley M. Kuhn
-
2022/12/13
Re: [License-discuss] in opposition of 'choice of law' provisions in FOSS licenses
Pamela Chestek
-
2022/12/13
[License-discuss] Retroactively disapproving licenses
Lawrence Rosen
-
2022/12/13
Re: [License-discuss] in opposition of 'choice of law' provisions in FOSS licenses
Richard Fontana
-
2022/12/13
Re: [License-discuss] in opposition of 'choice of law' provisions in FOSS licenses
Bradley M. Kuhn
-
2022/12/13
Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] in opposition of 'choice of law' provisions in FOSS licenses (was: For Approval: Open Logistics License v1.2)
Richard Fontana
-
2022/11/27
Re: [License-discuss] For Discussion: Open Logistics License v1.1
Andreas Nettsträter
-
2022/11/04
Re: [License-discuss] For Discussion: Open Logistics License v1.1
Andreas Nettsträter
-
2022/10/21
Re: [License-discuss] Clarity on Licensing for SaaS
Thorsten Glaser
-
2022/10/21
Re: [License-discuss] Clarity on Licensing for SaaS
Kevin P. Fleming
-
2022/10/21
[License-discuss] Clarity on Licensing for SaaS
Bryan Masterson
-
2022/10/06
Re: [License-discuss] For Discussion: Open Logistics License v1.1
Andreas Nettsträter
-
2022/09/22
Re: [License-discuss] Does the LinShare "attribution" notice violate OSD?
Pamela Chestek
-
2022/09/21
Re: [License-discuss] Does the LinShare "attribution" notice violate OSD?
Bradley M. Kuhn
-
2022/09/21
Re: [License-discuss] Does the LinShare "attribution" notice violate OSD?
Florian Weimer
-
2022/09/21
Re: [License-discuss] Does the LinShare "attribution" notice violate OSD?
Bradley M. Kuhn
-
2022/09/21
Re: [License-discuss] Does the LinShare "attribution" notice violate OSD?
Stefano Zacchiroli
-
2022/09/21
Re: [License-discuss] Does the LinShare "attribution" notice violate OSD?
Florian Weimer
-
2022/09/20
Re: [License-discuss] Does the LinShare "attribution" notice violate OSD?
Thorsten Glaser
-
2022/09/20
Re: [License-discuss] Does the LinShare "attribution" notice violate OSD?
Bradley M. Kuhn
-
2022/09/20
Re: [License-discuss] Does the LinShare "attribution" notice violate OSD?
Bruce Perens via License-discuss
-
2022/09/20
Re: [License-discuss] Does the LinShare "attribution" notice violate OSD?
Bruce Perens via License-discuss
-
2022/09/20
Re: [License-discuss] Does the LinShare "attribution" notice violate OSD?
Bruce Perens via License-discuss
-
2022/09/19
Re: [License-discuss] Does the LinShare "attribution" notice violate OSD?
Thorsten Glaser
-
2022/09/19
Re: [License-discuss] Does the LinShare "attribution" notice violate OSD?
Pamela Chestek
-
2022/09/19
Re: [License-discuss] Does the LinShare "attribution" notice violate OSD?
McCoy Smith
-
2022/09/19
Re: [License-discuss] Does the LinShare "attribution" notice violate OSD?
Simon Phipps
-
2022/09/19
Re: [License-discuss] Does the LinShare "attribution" notice violate OSD?
McCoy Smith
-
2022/09/19
Re: [License-discuss] Does the LinShare "attribution" notice violate OSD?
Thorsten Glaser
-
2022/09/19
Re: [License-discuss] Does the LinShare "attribution" notice violate OSD?
Simon Phipps
-
2022/09/19
Re: [License-discuss] Does the LinShare "attribution" notice violate OSD?
Stefano Zacchiroli
-
2022/09/19
Re: [License-discuss] Does the LinShare "attribution" notice violate OSD?
Pamela Chestek
-
2022/09/19
Re: [License-discuss] Does the LinShare "attribution" notice violate OSD?
McCoy Smith
-
2022/09/19
Re: [License-discuss] Does the LinShare "attribution" notice violate OSD?
Simon Phipps
-
2022/09/19
[License-discuss] Does the LinShare "attribution" notice violate OSD?
Josh Berkus
-
2022/09/19
Re: [License-discuss] For Discussion: Open Logistics License v1.1
McCoy Smith
-
2022/09/18
Re: [License-discuss] For Discussion: Open Logistics License v1.1
Andreas Nettsträter
-
2022/08/30
[License-discuss] For Discussion: Open Logistics License v1.1
Andreas Nettsträter
-
2022/08/18
Re: [License-discuss] Question about AGPLv3 with a Plugin Exception
Bruce Perens via License-discuss
-
2022/08/16
Re: [License-discuss] Question about AGPLv3 with a Plugin Exception
Ben Tilly
-
2022/08/15
Re: [License-discuss] Question about AGPLv3 with a Plugin Exception
Bradley M. Kuhn
-
2022/08/15
Re: [License-discuss] Question about AGPLv3 with a Plugin Exception
Thorsten Glaser
-
2022/08/15
Re: [License-discuss] Question about AGPLv3 with a Plugin Exception
Josh Berkus
-
2022/08/14
Re: [License-discuss] Question about AGPLv3 with a Plugin Exception
Joel Kelley
-
2022/08/14
Re: [License-discuss] Question about AGPLv3 with a Plugin Exception
Bruce Perens via License-discuss
-
2022/08/12
Re: [License-discuss] Question about AGPLv3 with a Plugin Exception
Bradley M. Kuhn
-
2022/08/10
Re: [License-discuss] Question about AGPLv3 with a Plugin Exception
McCoy Smith
-
2022/08/10
Re: [License-discuss] Question about AGPLv3 with a Plugin Exception
Bradley M. Kuhn
-
2022/08/10
Re: [License-discuss] Question about AGPLv3 with a Plugin Exception
Lawrence Rosen
-
2022/08/10
Re: [License-discuss] Question about AGPLv3 with a Plugin Exception
Kevin P. Fleming
-
2022/08/10
Re: [License-discuss] Question about AGPLv3 with a Plugin Exception
McCoy Smith
-
2022/08/10
[License-discuss] Question about AGPLv3 with a Plugin Exception
Joel Kelley
-
2022/08/05
Re: [License-discuss] Fwd: Should fork a project on github be seen as distribution of origin project?
Bruce Perens via License-discuss
-
2022/08/03
Re: [License-discuss] Fwd: Should fork a project on github be seen as distribution of origin project?
Thorsten Glaser
-
2022/08/03
Re: [License-discuss] Fwd: Should fork a project on github be seen as distribution of origin project?
Josh Berkus
-
2022/08/03
Re: [License-discuss] Fwd: Should fork a project on github be seen as distribution of origin project?
Alex Rousskov
-
2022/08/03
Re: [License-discuss] Fwd: Should fork a project on github be seen as distribution of origin project?
Bruce Perens via License-discuss
-
2022/08/02
Re: [License-discuss] Fwd: Should fork a project on github be seen as distribution of origin project?
Roland Turner via License-discuss
-
2022/08/02
Re: [License-discuss] Fwd: Should fork a project on github be seen as distribution of origin project?
Ben Tilly
-
2022/08/02
[License-discuss] Fwd: Should fork a project on github be seen as distribution of origin project?
なつよるほたる
-
2022/04/28
[License-discuss] McCoy Smith, GNOME, and RPI patent article
Christopher Sean Morrison via License-discuss
-
2021/11/16
Re: [License-discuss] MIT License with mandatory arbitration?
McCoy Smith
-
2021/11/16
[License-discuss] MIT License with mandatory arbitration?
Michael Downey
-
2021/11/11
Re: [License-discuss] Consumer protection, defective product
Bradley M. Kuhn
-
2021/11/11
Re: [License-discuss] Consumer protection, defective product
Pamela Chestek
-
2021/11/11
Re: [License-discuss] OSI as guarantor for "or later" *GPL clauses
Pamela Chestek
-
2021/11/03
Re: [License-discuss] Consumer protection, defective product
Roland Turner via License-discuss
-
2021/11/03
[License-discuss] Consumer protection, defective product
Dirk RIEHLE
-
2021/10/28
Re: [License-discuss] OSI as guarantor for "or later" *GPL clauses
Dirk RIEHLE
-
2021/10/27
Re: [License-discuss] OSI as guarantor for "or later" *GPL clauses
Roland Turner via License-discuss
-
2021/10/27
Re: [License-discuss] OSI as guarantor for "or later" *GPL clauses
Enrico Zini
-
2021/10/27
Re: [License-discuss] OSI as guarantor for "or later" *GPL clauses
Andrew DeMarsh
-
2021/10/27
Re: [License-discuss] OSI as guarantor for "or later" *GPL clauses
Enrico Zini
-
2021/09/09
Re: [License-discuss] Status of earlier AFL licenses?
Bruce Perens via License-discuss
-
2021/09/09
Re: [License-discuss] OSI as guarantor for "or later" *GPL clauses
Enrico Zini
-
2021/09/09
Re: [License-discuss] Status of earlier AFL licenses?
Sebastian Crane
-
2021/09/08
Re: [License-discuss] Status of earlier AFL licenses?
VM (Vicky) Brasseur
-
2021/09/08
Re: [License-discuss] Status of earlier AFL licenses?
Lawrence Rosen
-
2021/09/08
Re: [License-discuss] Status of earlier AFL licenses?
McCoy Smith
-
2021/09/08
Re: [License-discuss] Status of earlier AFL licenses?
VM (Vicky) Brasseur
-
2021/09/08
Re: [License-discuss] Status of earlier AFL licenses?
Kevin P. Fleming
-
2021/09/08
Re: [License-discuss] Status of earlier AFL licenses?
McCoy Smith
-
2021/09/08
Re: [License-discuss] Status of earlier AFL licenses?
VM (Vicky) Brasseur
-
2021/09/08
Re: [License-discuss] Status of earlier AFL licenses?
McCoy Smith
-
2021/09/08
Re: [License-discuss] Status of earlier AFL licenses?
Lawrence Rosen
-
2021/09/08
Re: [License-discuss] OSI as guarantor for "or later" *GPL clauses
Patrice-Emmanuel Schmitz via License-discuss
-
2021/09/07
Re: [License-discuss] Status of earlier AFL licenses?
McCoy Smith
-
2021/09/07
[License-discuss] Status of earlier AFL licenses?
VM (Vicky) Brasseur
-
2021/09/02
[License-discuss] OSI as guarantor for "or later" *GPL clauses
Enrico Zini
-
2021/09/02
Re: [License-discuss] License of open source licenses (the legal texts)?
Dirk RIEHLE
-
2021/08/31
Re: [License-discuss] License of open source licenses (the legal texts)?
Richard Fontana
-
2021/08/31
[License-discuss] License of open source licenses (the legal texts)?
Dirk RIEHLE
-
2021/08/25
Re: [License-discuss] Who is the user in 6. b), LGPL v2.1
VM (Vicky) Brasseur
-
2021/08/24
Re: [License-discuss] Who is the user in 6. b), LGPL v2.1
Yamada Yoshi
-
2021/08/23
Re: [License-discuss] Who is the user in 6. b), LGPL v2.1
Johnny A. Solbu
-
2021/08/23
[License-discuss] Who is the user in 6. b), LGPL v2.1
Yamada Yoshi
-
2021/07/01
Re: [License-discuss] MIT license difference between X.org, SPDX and OSI
Sebastian Crane
-
2021/06/09
Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] request for review of the 3D Slicer License
Lawrence Rosen
-
2021/06/08
Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] request for review of the 3D Slicer License
Lawrence Rosen
-
2021/06/08
Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] request for review of the 3D Slicer License
Lawrence Rosen
-
2021/05/03
Re: [License-discuss] License-discuss Digest, Vol 106, Issue 8
Gustavo G . Mármol
-
2021/04/30
Re: [License-discuss] Google v. Oracle
Richard Fontana
-
2021/04/30
Re: [License-discuss] Google v. Oracle
McCoy Smith
-
2021/04/30
Re: [License-discuss] Google v. Oracle
Pamela Chestek
-
2021/04/29
Re: [License-discuss] Google v. Oracle
Patrice-Emmanuel Schmitz via License-discuss
-
2021/04/25
Re: [License-discuss] Google v. Oracle
Pamela Chestek
-
2021/04/24
[License-discuss] Google v. Oracle
Lawrence Rosen
-
2021/04/07
Re: [License-discuss] Database of all licenses?
Kevin P. Fleming
-
2021/04/06
[License-discuss] Database of all licenses?
James
-
2021/04/06
Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] Please rename "Free Public License-1.0.0" to 0BSD... again.
Pamela Chestek
-
2021/04/06
Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] Please rename "Free Public License-1.0.0" to 0BSD... again.
Josh Berkus
-
2021/04/06
Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] Please rename "Free Public License-1.0.0" to 0BSD... again.
McCoy Smith
-
2021/04/06
Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] Please rename "Free Public License-1.0.0" to 0BSD... again.
Nigel T
-
2021/04/06
Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] Please rename "Free Public License-1.0.0" to 0BSD... again.
Josh Berkus
-
2021/04/06
Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] Please rename "Free Public License-1.0.0" to 0BSD... again.
Christopher Sean Morrison via License-discuss
-
2021/04/06
Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] Please rename "Free Public License-1.0.0" to 0BSD... again.
Nigel T
-
2021/04/06
Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] Please rename "Free Public License-1.0.0" to 0BSD... again.
McCoy Smith
-
2021/04/06
Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] Please rename "Free Public License-1.0.0" to 0BSD... again.
Rob Landley
-
2021/04/05
Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] Please rename "Free Public License-1.0.0" to 0BSD... again.
Rob Landley
-
2021/04/05
Re: [License-discuss] Google wins
dmg
-
2021/04/05
Re: [License-discuss] Google wins
Ben Tilly
-
2021/04/05
[License-discuss] Google wins
Lawrence Rosen
-
2021/04/05
Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] Please rename "Free Public License-1.0.0" to 0BSD... again.
McCoy Smith
-
2021/04/05
Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] Please rename "Free Public License-1.0.0" to 0BSD... again.
Richard Fontana
-
2021/04/05
Re: [License-discuss] [License-review] Please rename "Free Public License-1.0.0" to 0BSD... again.
Rob Landley
-
2021/03/22
[License-discuss] MIT license difference between X.org, SPDX and OSI
Keith Packard via License-discuss
-
2021/02/27
[License-discuss] Legal use of software
Lawrence Rosen
-
2021/02/23
Re: [License-discuss] Question about Python 2.0 license
Candice Wright
-
2021/02/22
Re: [License-discuss] Does GeoGebra meet the Open Source Definition?
Thorsten Glaser
-
2021/02/22
[License-discuss] Does GeoGebra meet the Open Source Definition?
robert . pollak
-
2021/02/13
Re: [License-discuss] Question about Python 2.0 license
Gregor Hoffleit
-
2021/02/12
Re: [License-discuss] Question about Python 2.0 license
Candice Wright
-
2021/02/12
Re: [License-discuss] Question about Python 2.0 license
Gregor Hoffleit
-
2021/02/12
[License-discuss] Question about Python 2.0 license
Candice Wright