Hi,
I can't install spam assassins.
i have perl v5.8.0 and redhat 9
i got this error:
~~~
./configuremake: ./configure: Command not
foundmake: *** [binaries.mk] Error 127~~~
What should I do?
Thanks
> Don't call ./configure.. read the INSTALL file which will tell you to:
>
> 1)perl Makefile.PL
> 2)make
> 3)make install
>
> Note there's no ./configure in there :)
I did that. I got this error when i tried to do the "make" command
~~
Makefile:92: *** missing separator. S
I tried to install SA but get this
error:
--
Makefile:92: *** missing separator.
Stop.
when i tried to type this command before i type
perl Makefile.PL "export LANG=en_US"
i get this error:
--
./configuremake: ./configure: Command not
foundmake: *** [binaries.mk] Error 127--
Any Idea
HI,
Is there a way I can tell SA not to use
OPENSSL?
I get this error when I test SA.
Apparently its in DNS/RR/SIG.pm line
12
thanks
uldn't see anything about it over on the razor
homepage or mailing list archives
Regards,
Simon
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of E
At 04:33 29/01/2004, Matt Kettler wrote:
At 02:00 AM 1/28/2004, Simon Byrnand wrote:
Has anyone else noticed frequent timeouts with Razor2 ?
I disabled it Friday due to timeouts.
Ah... Yes I just disabled it myself last night after about half an hour of
debugging to make sure it wasn't a sof
I'm running a base debian stable box and just installed the
spamassassin yesterday via source. for some reason when I perform
an /etc/init.d/sysklogd restart on the box the spamd process dies
about 30 seconds later. Is that normal? I've tried running the
daemon in the foreground, watching the proc
Our mail server machine (i586 debian gnu/linux 128 MB RAM) crashed the
other day. Looking over the logs it appears we were spambombed..
12AM 4/15/02 - 12AM 4/16/02 - 7126 Messages received (about average)
12AM 4/16/02 - 9AM 4/16/02 - 28,084 Messages received
in a console before a slow-taking re
Hi there,
how can I activate/setup the german translation with comes with the new
2.20 release? It seems that the translation is only covered by the CVS
...
Regards,
Simon
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https
hi there!
how can i use localised config files? i've put them in the config dir
but they won't be read by SA. do i have to set a locale??
thanks advance.
regards,
simon
___
Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking fo
t;this mail is probably spam" even though it scored -2.8!!
Er, anyone have any ideas?
Simon
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
___
Have big pipe
S_DUL Received via RBLed relay, see http://www.mail-abuse.org/rbl/
header X_RBL_RSS_DULeval:check_rbl_results_for('rblplus', '127.0.0.7')
describe X_RBL_RSS_DUL Received via RBLed relay, see http://www.mail-abuse.org/rbl/
score RCVD_IN_RBL_PLUS 0.01
score X_RBL 4
sco
contains bad words
testDOMAIN_BADWORD ok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
maybe?
Someone want to throw it at the GA?
--
Simon Lyall.| Newsmaster | Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Network/System Admin | Postmaster | Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ihug, Auckland, NZ | A
t's own header which is easy to parse.
We then have a backend program on the final delivery stage that looks at
the header, does a LDAP query for the users spam threshold and then puts
the email whereever.
--
Simon Lyall.| Newsmaster | Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Net
sent from blackholed (RBL etc) sites.
--
Simon Lyall.| Newsmaster | Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Network/System Admin | Postmaster | Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ihug, Auckland, NZ | Asst Doorman | Web: http://www.darkmere.gen.nz
>
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] C version
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 14:34:54 +0200
--
Simon Lyall.| Newsmaster | Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Network/System Admin | Postmaster | Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ihug, Auckland, NZ | Asst Doorman | Web: http://www
intending to
install a local razor server without connecting it to the main
razor network.
--
Simon Lyall.| Newsmaster | Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Network/System Admin | Postmaster | Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ihug, Auckland, NZ | Asst Doorman | Web: http://www.darkme
ssin is here to help avoid. Each message should be
judged on its own merits, and shouldn't be rejected simply because the
*first* octet of the ip address is the samegeeze...
Of course, you'll only receive my reply through the list and not directly,
since you're already blocking m
Hi Everyone,
I don't normally forward spams onto the list, but this particular one
caught my attention because it only scored 0.9, and I have *ALL* network
tests on (RBL, Razor, DCC, Pyzor) as well as Bayes :-(
Regards,
Simon
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from
At 22:43 11/08/2003 -0400, Ryan Bingham wrote:
Oh the Irony!
Oh bugger... you beat me to it :) (word for word)
Regards,
Simon
- Original Message -
From: "Justin Mason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 7:14 PM
Subject: [
user for testing. :-(
Hi,
Add -H to the end of your spamd options linealso, if you use -u on the
spamd options line, make sure the user it switches to has a valid home
directory.
Regards,
Simon
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free
positives, and there was talk of taking the test out altogether, so
from the point of view of SpamAssassin using SPEWS, I think its pretty
much case closed.
Arguing about whether SPEWS are doing the right thing or not in general
should be taken to private email or to some other list/group w
e included into 2.60 :-(
Also broken is MSGID_OE_SPAM_4ZERO which triggers on netfolders updates..
Regards,
Simon
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available
> At Fri Aug 15 22:36:30 2003, Simon Byrnand wrote:
>
>> Exactly what version of Outlook or Outlook Express are you using ?
>>
>> As far as I can see the FORGED_MUA_OIMO rule is significantly broken and
>> falsely detects recent versions of Outlook/Outlook Express as
age-ids?
You suddenly get significant problems with spammers forging X-Mailer
headers again (a la 2.5[0123]).
We'll have to see what happens
Well I don't think we can dictate subtle behavioural requirements to people
like Microsoft, we just basically have to go with whatever they do
shell
install HTML::Parser
quit
It will either say its already up to date, or it will get and install the
latest version for you.
Regards,
Simon
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by Dice.com.
Did you know that Dice has over 25,000 tech jobs
any case, the practice of spammers using your email address as the from
address in their spam to make it look like you're sending spam is commonly
referred to as a "joe job" and there is nothing much you can do about it.
Regards,
Simon
-
At 17:20 19/08/2003 -0400, Fred I-IS.COM wrote:
Wow, that was a 5 hour delay from when I sent that message.
Only 5 hours ? Thats pretty good for this list, sometimes I don't see my
own posts the same day :)
(And no, I'm only slightly exagerating..)
Rega
more advanced features.
(All a neophyte has to do is enable the quarantine option)
Regards,
Simon
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine.
WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linu
don't see whats special about those particular spams over and above the
millions of others that are circulating around
Regards,
Simon
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a singl
Hi,
The tech support team who look ofter my dedicated machine have just
installed SpamAssassin and Clam AV, which seems to be working extremely
well. There's just one thing that has me a bit stumped...
According to the SpamAssassin docs any mail tagged as spam should have
the subject rewritten
esn't call the
razor binaries, it directly loads the Razor perl modules...
Regards,
Simon
>
> On Friday, July 4, 2003, at 08:02 PM, Dale LaFountain wrote:
>
>>> On 05.06.2003 16:48 Uhr, Chris Balay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> AARGHH! I am
ozled by a Precedence header, then
maybe you need to look at why and fix it. (It should have no effect either
positive or negative on spam filtering.)
Regards,
Simon
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run m
.. (which I suspect
doesn't get as much testing as report_safe 1 :)
Regards,
Simon
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine.
WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows
> On Sat, Aug 23, 2003 at 10:38:35PM +1200, Simon Byrnand wrote:
>> Ok, I'll probably get thumped by someone for not RTFM but I'm just
>> trying
>> out 2.60-rc2 on a test machine, and for whatever reason it is not adding
>> the X-Spam-Report header on message
se of this ?
Just curious...
Regards,
Simon
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine.
WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines
at the same time.
> On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 12:26:49AM +1200, Simon Byrnand wrote:
>> But the report doesn't look anything like the old full reports... (which
>> I
>
> As I said, no more full reports in the header.
:(
>
>> You suggested using _REPORT_ (which I will try instea
n=2.60-rc2
Mucked up by email client wrapping of course - but anyhow the first \n
actually did give a new line in the header, but the following ones are
just showing up in the report. I tried putting spaces around them but it
didn't help, so it seems to simply not process any \n'
> On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 11:24:03AM +1200, Simon Byrnand wrote:
>> Well I tried both _REPORT_ and _SUMMARY_ in the header, and they both
>> look
>> the same ?? And they're quite badly formatted too:
>
> Are you using one of the rc releases? The default header is
>> On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 11:24:03AM +1200, Simon Byrnand wrote:
> I suspect there could be a bug in the header folding, perhaps if some of
> the report lines are very long, because I've definately seen the
> occasional lines in the report where the line is wrapped right in
> On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 12:13:41PM +1200, Simon Byrnand wrote:
>> Mucked up by email client wrapping of course - but anyhow the first \n
>> actually did give a new line in the header, but the following ones are
>> just showing up in the report. I tried putting spaces around
being wrapped. This is a copy of the message I
forwared to the Squirrelmail devel list
Regards,
Simon
--8<-
I'm not sure how far away 1.4.2 is but I think I've found a bug in header
display/wrapping in "View all Headers" (1.4.1) that is tri
At 01:16 25/08/2003 +0200, Malte S. Stretz wrote:
On Monday 25 August 2003 00:30 CET Simon Byrnand wrote:
> This is directed partly at Theo, partly at the list
Hope you forgive me for answering :o)
Of course :)
> It seems to be caused by using tabs for folded header lines instead of
At 21:03 24/08/2003 -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 11:36:02AM +1200, Simon Byrnand wrote:
> Ok, that clears that up. I'm pretty sure the problem is with Squirrelmail,
> either the tabs or the long lines, I was mainly posting a copy in this
list
> to find
is using a fairly old version, it may
not be supported...
Regards,
Simon
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine.
WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Nove
ocmail script relied on seeing 80 stars or more
to be able to detect blacklisted email (only)... and it will be quite
difficult to rearrange that along with the user preferences frontend I
have...is that 50 star limit staying in ?
Regards,
Simon
--
At 22:56 24/08/2003 -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 02:14:12PM +1200, Simon Byrnand wrote:
> I don't know whether this is fixed by Theo's patch or not, as I havn't
> tried it...I suspect not.
Nope.
> In any case there seems to be some bad i
At 03:56 25/08/2003 +0200, Malte S. Stretz wrote:
On Monday 25 August 2003 03:18 CET Simon Byrnand wrote:
> At 21:03 24/08/2003 -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> >X-Spam-Status (and all the X-Spam-* headers actually) is wrapped unless
> >you set the "fold_headers" option to
At 23:22 24/08/2003 -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 02:59:42PM +1200, Simon Byrnand wrote:
> already using on 2.55 I'm curious to know if the new values were chosen
> empirically or whether some kind of stats were involved to check the
lowest
> scores of spam a
At 21:03 24/08/2003 -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 11:36:02AM +1200, Simon Byrnand wrote:
> Ok, that clears that up. I'm pretty sure the problem is with Squirrelmail,
> either the tabs or the long lines, I was mainly posting a copy in this
list
> to find
ups :)
As for the others:
DCC Outgoing Port 6277 UDP
Pyzor Outgoing Port 24441 UDP
Razor Outgoing Ports 7 and 2703 TCP
Regards,
Simon
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems o
At 23:40 24/08/2003 -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 03:36:50PM +1200, Simon Byrnand wrote:
> Ok. Did the statistics file give any suggestion of what kind of balance
> between spam and ham would get autolearnt with those thresholds ? Is the
Have you looked at the STAT
At 03:56 25/08/2003 +0200, Malte S. Stretz wrote:
On Monday 25 August 2003 03:18 CET Simon Byrnand wrote:
> At 21:03 24/08/2003 -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> >X-Spam-Status (and all the X-Spam-* headers actually) is wrapped unless
> >you set the "fold_headers" option to
and the headers indeed showed
no SA checks. I too reverted back to 2.55.
Try rc2, thats probably the DNS lookup error that caused the scanning of
the whole message to fail if an RBL check timed out
Regards,
Simon
---
This SF.net email is spon
At 00:05 26/08/2003 -0400, Larry Gilson wrote:
I have not had much call to create custom rules. I just started
experimenting with rules and I noticed that the rules were not checked
unless I first restarted spamd. Is this normal?
Yep.
Regards,
Simon
pam is above 6 as much as possible". Or am I missing
something ?
Just an idea :)
Regards,
Simon
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
st after a new
SpamAssassin release, or just after the GA run for a new release has been
completed ;-)
Regards,
Simon
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
s for, I think there would be a
defintate improvement in FN/FP rate of an independant corpus using the 6/4
threshold instead of 5/5.
Anybody able to blow holes in my theory or suggest a way of proving it ?
Regards,
Simon
---
This sf.net email is spon
ore X_OSIRU_DUL 0
score X_OSIRU_DUL_FH 0
score X_OSIRU_OPEN_RELAY 0
score X_OSIRU_SPAMWARE_SITE 0
score X_OSIRU_SPAM_SRC 0
(Hope I didn't miss any)
Regards,
Simon
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkG
Good reason to get 2.60rc3 out ASAP ;)
So are the scores just zero'ed out for rc3 then ? I suppose its not worth
the effort and time of another GA run...:)
Regards,
Simon
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome
>
> Simon Byrnand writes:
>> I was just thinking about the GA process and although I havn't looked at
>> it to see exactly how it works, I was wondering the following
>>
>> Presumably it starts with a certain scoreset, runs the spam through,
>> sees
&g
> By all means do it! :) ... but it won't help that there are still
> servers
> that use the rbl directly from sendmail or postfix and the like.. :(
And they will soon discover that they've been rejecting nearlly all mail
because of it, and remove relays.osirusoft.com.
d showed
> no SA checks. I too reverted back to 2.55.
Have you tried rc2 ? I read that it was a bug in the DNS lookups that
caused the message to fail to be scanned if one of the DNS requests timed
out... Aparently fixed in rc2. (I havn't seen that problem o
razor and DCC :)
Regards,
Simon
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourc
s...
Oh yeah, it claims to be written in Java too.. :)
I don't think I'll be switching away from SpamAssassin any time soon...
Comments anyone ?
Regards,
Simon
---
This sf.net email is sponsored
should ignore it. Well
duh! Spam anyone ? :) (And yes, their bogus virus reports are detected by
both DCC and Razor now)
Regards
Simon
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
At 20:51 27/08/2003 -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 12:40:12PM +1200, Simon Byrnand wrote:
> I don't think I'll be switching away from SpamAssassin any time soon...
>
> Comments anyone ?
98% of all statistics are lies. :)
Heheheh... I don't think I
At 18:41 27/08/2003 -0700, Justin Mason wrote:
Simon Byrnand writes:
>Just got a sales pitch today by phone followed up by email from these guys:
>
>http://www.death2spam.net.nz/
>
>Anybody else heard of them ? Their system claims to be based on Bayesian
>filtering and claim
tm) adds a whole host
of new RBL checks. Unless you have a specific RBL you're interested in that
isn't currently supported by SpamAssassin, then it is *already* using a
selection of RBL lists...
Regards,
Simon
Selon Bob Apthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, 27 Aug 200
At 18:41 27/08/2003 -0700, Justin Mason wrote:
Simon Byrnand writes:
>Just got a sales pitch today by phone followed up by email from these guys:
>
>http://www.death2spam.net.nz/
>
>Anybody else heard of them ? Their system claims to be based on Bayesian
>filtering and claim
ll be a bit of short term pain (for some people) for longterm
gain :)
Regards,
Simon
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Sp
rusoft tests for 2.60-rc3, so by the time 2.60 comes out the tests will
be gone.
It's also on the news page of the website how to disable the tests for
2.55, and its been discussed at least 4 or 5 times already in the mailing
list, so theres not much more that can be done...
Regards,
Simon
is through
CPAN.
perl -MCPAN -e shell
install Net::DNS
quit
After that you want to try running a message through SpamAssassin manually
from the command prompt in debugging mode and look at the debugging output
for mention of DNS and RBL che
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 10:31:50PM +1200, Simon Byrnand wrote:
>> RBL checks are on by default, but you have to have the Net::DNS perl
>> module installed for them to work.
>
> Woah!
>
> I DON'T have that installed! And I never got a warning anywhere?!
>
iling when they shouldn't...
Regards,
Simon
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https
ables automatic header folding causing long lines...
Regards,
Simon
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[
At 22:38 28/08/2003 -0700, Daniel Quinlan wrote:
Simon Byrnand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Although I don't have the answer to your question, I suggest you look at
> using the following options to reduce the various timeouts to minimize the
> chance of a "train wreck&qu
> Simon Byrnand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> So umm, how does the rbl_timeout setting work in 2.60 then ? I didn't
>> quite
>> follow the logic of what you said :) I would have previously assumed
>> that
>> it was just a cutoff where if an ind
l/etc to
> /etc).
> See also bug 2374 [1].
Argh, more traps...
So what is the behaviour when running perl Makefile.PL with no command
line arguments ? Will it be looking for /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf ??
Regards,
Simon
---
This sf.net
sin or /usr/local/etc/mail/spamassassin), and use that
> one. Or, ask, like it does for Razor2.
>
> Simply switching between versions however is a bad idea.
I agree wholeheartedly... There are enough surprises for the unwary
between 2.55 and 2.60 alr
> Installed fine, upgraded fine from cvs of three weeks ago or so. Can't
> comment on effectiveness yet. One thing I note is that it again needs more
> RAM, it's now at almost 25 MB.
Not for me it size, Size of 19996, and RSS of 17M after running for a
while... the same as 2.
> On Friday 29 August 2003 04:34 CET Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 01:57:27PM +1200, Simon Byrnand wrote:
>> > Fixed now, but the second part of Theo's fix (assuming he did it :)
>> > doesn't seem to be in there - using any \n's to add
otherwise it won't learn ham.
>
> --Luke
Hi,
Did you actually check what the default is for 2.60 ? In rc2 and rc3 the
default is 0.1 for ham and 12 for spam... (we should give the developers
some credit ;-)
Regards,
Simon
>
>
> As
>"Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL
la ticket
in about it just in case it gets forgotten :)
Regards,
Simon
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing li
s with tflags set to 'userconf' (user
white/black-listing rules, etc)
Regards,
Simon
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Spamass
At 17:50 1/09/2003 +0200, Carlo Wood wrote:
On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 04:31:34PM +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> > whitelisted mails should not be auto learned.
>
> That is just what Simon said and SA does.
Oh... sorry. He said
S> Please check the docs, Bayes auto_learn does not t
At 02:24 2/09/2003 +0200, Carlo Wood wrote:
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 09:56:54AM +1200, Simon Byrnand wrote:
> On the other hand, there is nothing to stop the message being
autolearnt if
> its score before the whitelisting value is added, so for example if a spam
> would normally score
At 06:02 2/09/2003 +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 01:02:47PM +1200, Simon Byrnand wrote:
> At 02:24 2/09/2003 +0200, Carlo Wood wrote:
> >On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 09:56:54AM +1200, Simon Byrnand wrote:
> I don't whitelist this mailing list and I know at
te normal for example for spamd to use close to 20MB
of ram.
Also, how are you calling spamassassin. (spamc, spamassassin, or a direct
filter plugin etc)
Regards,
Simon
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven
What you say is true of course...(as well as funny)
Regards,
Simon
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing l
a limit on concurant
scanning, however it will also cause connections to be rejected when this
limit is reached. (As well as that, 24 simultaneous spamassassin processes
is enough to bring most machines to their knees)
Regards,
Simon
---
This sf.ne
ay to
find this out from spamd directly rather than using ps ?) and if its over a
set limit, exit with EX_TEMPFAIL. A workaround like that could be used by
anyone calling spamc from procmail...
I might have a tutu around later and see if I can work out a procmail
recipie to d
At 14:20 2/09/2003 +0200, Carlo Wood wrote:
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 01:02:47PM +1200, Simon Byrnand wrote:
> Well don't forget that the auto_learn_spam threshold is 15 in 2.55 and 12
> in 2.60, and its very rare that a spam pasted into the *body* of a message
> will be autolearnt,
es not to be learnt.
There are quite a number of reason for autolearning not to learn something,
its not just a matter of if its greater than 15 learn it
Regards,
Simon
---
This sf.net email is sponsored
the score of an RBL check to zero
*does* disable the test itself, and has be confirmed by the developers on
previous occasions
Regards,
Simon
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven
> Simon Byrnand wrote:
>
>> At 20:43 4/09/2003 +0200, Ralf G. R. Bergs wrote:
>>
>>> Jim Porter wrote:
>>>
>>>> score RCVD_IN_OSIRUSOFT_COM 0
>>>> score X_OSIRU_DUL 0
>>>> score X_OSIRU_DUL_FH0
is reduce the initial communication setup
latency between spamc and spamd, and also allow large messages to be
transfered through to spamd and back again faster, but the actual scanning
of the message would be the same as before. As this is likely to be the
bulk of the scanning time I
unctioning properly,
and that it could be an integration problem...
Regards,
Simon
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Spamassassin-talk ma
Essentially this would be off-by-default extra information/debugging
information.
Regards,
Simon
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
without making a donation.
Spamcop can be turned on just by setting the score to something that's not 0.
Which brings up a good question that I've been meaning to ask. If spamcop
is not free to use, why does 2.60-rc3 enable it by default ?
score RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET 0 2.
1 - 100 of 356 matches
Mail list logo
