At 21:03 24/08/2003 -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 11:36:02AM +1200, Simon Byrnand wrote:
> Ok, that clears that up. I'm pretty sure the problem is with Squirrelmail,
> either the tabs or the long lines, I was mainly posting a copy in this list
> to find out if the new header behaviour of 2.60 was legit or not...


it is. :)

> I do wonder though whether the very long lines are a good idea. Normal
> email bodies are normally wrapped to a certain maximum line length, is it
> necessary for headers to be wrapped as well ? Since 2.60 the X-Spam-Status
> header is no longer wrapped, its just one big long line and I wonder if
> that could cause problems with other clients as well as Squirrelmail ?

X-Spam-Status (and all the X-Spam-* headers actually) is wrapped unless
you set the "fold_headers" option to 0.

Well, I don't have any fold_headers option in the config anywhere, (never have) and according to the man page, fold_headers defaults to 1 (on) and yet in 2.60-rc2 I'm definately seeing the X-Spam-Status: header unfolded - eg I can see ones that are as long as 240 characters on one line.


So either the default for fold_headers has somehow become 0 or its a bug ?

Regards,
Simon



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine.
WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines
at the same time. Free trial click here:http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/358/0
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to