Re: Tunneling through a firewall to a vncserver.

vncconnect. Simply run: > > vncconnect host > > I don't understand, how can I connect to "host" if it is behind a > firewall? client: vncviewer -listen server: Xvnc :1 (or vncserver :1) server: vncconnect -display :1 client If the server is behin

Re: Tunneling through a firewall to a vncserver.

I agree, this 5-step process is a bit much, and probably can be reduced with few scripts.. But it was done more as a exercise rather than anything else. Also, an important feature is that nothing in this code is tied directly to VNC, so you could use this code to attach to any server process beh

Re: Tunneling through a firewall to a vncserver.

On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 05:15:12PM -0500, Chris Gokey wrote: > > I'd be interested in any feedback this group can offer, regarding best > encryption to use, best way to compress data, security concerns, etc. Zlib compression is great, although it would be unnecessary if you use TightVNC with tig

Tunneling through a firewall to a vncserver.

I have written some code in Java that would allow a vncclient to tunnel through a firewall and connect to a vncserver. The code is currently at a temporary http address: http://24.91.182.203:8080/vnc_tunnel/index.html.; This package will allow a VNC client to communicate with a VNC server

Suggestions on server redirection behind firewall

Can somebody point me in the right direction here. What we are trying to do is to have multiple servers which are behind a firewall. Clients can connect through a proxy/gateway machine and have their vnc session redirected to on of the servers. All clients would go to the same server. The

RE: firewall woes

On Thu, 2001-12-13 at 22:41, Penke, Troy D wrote: > Somebody correct me if this sounds boneheaded.. but don't you need TWO > ports open when the JAVA viewer is involved? Yes: one for the browser, and one for VNC. - To unsubscribe

Re: firewall woes

Nate: Heya. You're *so* close. :) The browser-based VNC viewer is delivered to a requesting user via port 5800, which you have correctly setup and forwarded in your firewall. However...just like a regular VNC viewer...it *still* uses the default port 5900 for data exchange.

RE: firewall woes

ROTECTED] >Subject: firewall woes > > >Hi all, > >I have set up a router/firewall in front of a small network. > >I want to vnc into one of my machines from outside the firewall via the web. > >I set up the router/firewall as follows: > >Port 5801 is forwarded to p

RE: firewall woes

Can you telnet to 11.11.11.11 port 5900 from the client machine? -Original Message- From: Nate Harel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 19:14 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: firewall woes Hi all, I have set up a router/firewall in front of a small network. I

RE: firewall woes

lf Of Nate Harel Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 9:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: firewall woes Hi all, I have set up a router/firewall in front of a small network. I want to vnc into one of my machines from outside the firewall via the web. I set up the router/firewall as follows: Port 58

Re: firewall woes

If your Web server is on port 5801, VNC expects your VNC server to be on port 5901. On Thu, 2001-12-13 at 21:13, Nate Harel wrote: > Hi all, > > I have set up a router/firewall in front of a small network. > > I want to vnc into one of my machines from outside the firewall via

firewall woes

Hi all, I have set up a router/firewall in front of a small network. I want to vnc into one of my machines from outside the firewall via the web. I set up the router/firewall as follows: Port 5801 is forwarded to port 5800 on the machine I want to connect to (call it MachineA IP: 11.11.11.11

Re: AW: Timeout Problem with XP - firewall not the problem

ScanMan wrote: > If (hypothetically) the number of non-Micro$oft hosts on the Internet > dropped below, say, 20% or so, they would probably make it illegal to > connect to a non-Windoze box at all. They might even make it illegal to > spread rumors that non Micro$oft OS's even exist... Don't be

RE: AW: Timeout Problem with XP - firewall not the problem

S! I don't think they need any more help in coming up with new ideas on how to increase profits... Michael At 05:00 PM 2001-12-12, you wrote: >Subject: RE: AW: Timeout Problem with XP - firewall not the problem >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >I

Re: Timeout Problem with XP - firewall not the problem

We've used VNC okay here under Windows XP Pro Build 2600. AT&T's 3.3.3r9 for Win32 works okay (including the restoration of the default system wallpaper ;). We currently use the Tridia 1.5.4.0 source base for the machines though, and there are no troubles at all. Only troubles we've had are cl

RE: AW: Timeout Problem with XP - firewall not the problem

lenn Lovitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 1:25 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: AW: Timeout Problem with XP - firewall not the problem > > Enjoy your VNC connections with impunity. The real crime was committed by

Re: AW: Timeout Problem with XP - firewall not the problem

>Slashdot.org, circa 2006: > >Microsoft announced today the release of Windows PUO (the PU stands for >Pay Us Often.) It is most notable for its vastly simplified license >agreement - the new release ships with a short 500-page EULA that is >rumored to require only one new license to be purchased

RE: AW: Timeout Problem with XP - firewall not the problem

ct: RE: AW: Timeout Problem with XP - firewall not the problem Enjoy your VNC connections with impunity. The real crime was committed by the lawyers that wrote this EULA tripe to begin with and the MS Execs who approved it. Glenn Lovitz --

RE: AW: Timeout Problem with XP - firewall not the problem

TED] Subject: Re: AW: Timeout Problem with XP - firewall not the problem 1) I can only assume that it must lock out the display, keyboard and mouse on the client PC, essentially disabling access to the host PC locally until the remote session is done. This is what Microsoft does with their Remote De

Re: Timeout Problem with XP - firewall not the problem

ll, >> >> I tried Glenn's suggestion regarding turning off XP's firewall. (Thanks Glenn >> :-) ) I checked my settings, and the firewall was turned off already. I do run >> ZoneAlarm Pro, but I doubt it is the source of the problem because I am >> running

Re: Timeout Problem with XP - firewall not the problem

imeout Problem with XP - firewall not the problem > I do not recall hearing any success stories about WinXP and VNC. I do > not know if it is even possible using current code. Most likely, M$ has > obfusicated the display reading functions VNC uses beyond recognition. > > On Tue, 2001-1

Re: AW: Timeout Problem with XP - firewall not the problem

Slashdot.org, circa 2006: Microsoft announced today the release of Windows PUO (the PU stands for Pay Us Often.) It is most notable for its vastly simplified license agreement - the new release ships with a short 500-page EULA that is rumored to require only one new license to be purchased for ev

Re: AW: Timeout Problem with XP - firewall not the problem

1) I can only assume that it must lock out the display, keyboard and mouse on the client PC, essentially disabling access to the host PC locally until the remote session is done. This is what Microsoft does with their Remote Desktop Connection. 2) Read the last two lines of the license passage

AW: Timeout Problem with XP - firewall not the problem

on http://www.symantec.com/pcanywhere/Consumer/ they write pcanywhere can be used on XP. Is this legal? > "Except as otherwise permitted by the NetMeeting, Remote Assistance, > and Remote Desktop features described below, you may not use the > Product to permit any Device to use, access, d

Re: Timeout Problem with XP - firewall not the problem

Andrew Stockment wrote: > Regarding the legality of running VNC on Windows XP, I do not interpret the > license agreement to proclude the use of VNC. I don't see how else it can be read: "Except as otherwise permitted by the NetMeeting, Remote Assistance, and Remote Desktop features descri

RE: Timeout Problem with XP - firewall not the problem

[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of ScanMan > Sent: 11 December 2001 7:30 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Timeout Problem with XP - firewall not the problem > > > I do not recall hearing any success stories about WinXP and VNC. I do > not know if it is even possible using

Re: Timeout Problem with XP - firewall not the problem

; I tried Glenn's suggestion regarding turning off XP's firewall. (Thanks Glenn > :-) ) I checked my settings, and the firewall was turned off already. I do run > ZoneAlarm Pro, but I doubt it is the source of the problem because I am > running ZoneAlarm Pro with the same settings

Timeout Problem with XP - firewall not the problem

Howdy All, I tried Glenn's suggestion regarding turning off XP's firewall. (Thanks Glenn :-) ) I checked my settings, and the firewall was turned off already. I do run ZoneAlarm Pro, but I doubt it is the source of the problem because I am running ZoneAlarm Pro with the same settings

Re: ssh -R to hear ports outside the firewall

Hi Miroslav, > > So, this is the problem. The telnet hangs after printing: > > $ telnet 127.0.0.1 5911 > > Trying 127.0.0.1... > > Connected to localhost.localdomain (127.0.0.1). > > Escape character is '^]'. > > What is your SSH client? With Mindterm I get exactly the same behaviour. But > if

RE: ssh -R to hear ports outside the firewall

Hi, Sergey. > So, this is the problem. The telnet hangs after printing: > $ telnet 127.0.0.1 5911 > Trying 127.0.0.1... > Connected to localhost.localdomain (127.0.0.1). > Escape character is '^]'. What is your SSH client? With Mindterm I get exactly the same behaviour. But if I connect to t

Re: ssh -R to hear ports outside the firewall

Privet, Miro! > OK, let's try the next step. When logged > through ssh on your mysshd machine, try > "telnet 127.0.0.1 5911" and see if you > get a string like "RFB 003.003" Thank you very much! So, this is the problem. The telnet hangs after printing: $ telnet 127.0.0.1 5911 Trying 1

RE: ssh -R to hear ports outside the firewall

0 0 127.0.0.1:2793 127.0.0.1:5911 > ESTABLISHED OK, let's try the next step. When logged through ssh on your mysshd machine, try "telnet 127.0.0.1 5911" and see if you get a string like "RFB 003.003" > > Also, can you check t

RE: ssh -R to hear ports outside the firewall

Jonathan, > >(at least OpenSSH), then sshd listens only on 127.0.0.1:portnumber. > > Fix this using the -g parameter (listen to everywhere, not just > localhost). "-g" is a ssh, not sshd parameter. That means if you use "ssh -g -L", then ssh will listen on 0.0.0.0:port, otherwise (without -

Re: ssh -R to hear ports outside the firewall

0 0 127.0.0.1:5911 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN tcp0 0 127.0.0.1:5911 127.0.0.1:2793 ESTABLISHED tcp0 0 127.0.0.1:2793 127.0.0.1:5911 ESTABLISHED > > Also, can you check the firewall (port filtering) rules

RE: ssh -R to hear ports outside the firewall

> > I waited several hours, but nothing happened. Is there >> anybody succeded in >> connecting to VNC server through the tunnel, organized by >> "ssh -R" option? > >It works. But my experience is that when "ssh -R" is used with sshd on linux >(at least OpenSSH), then sshd listens only on 127.

RE: ssh -R to hear ports outside the firewall

OpenSSH), then sshd listens only on 127.0.0.1:portnumber. Send us the output of "netstat -rn | grep 5900" when you are connected to the mysshd machine. Also, can you check the firewall (port filtering) rules on your sshd server? Regards, Miroslav Luptak --

Re: ssh -R to hear ports outside the firewall

> > > That might be a DNS-reverse-lookup problem. Leave it for a few > > > minutes and see if it completes the connection. > > > >Hi Jonatan, will you please instruct me in details what should I do > >and what may be the source of such DNS-reverse-lookup check which > >failed, - VNC server, vie

Re: ssh -R to hear ports outside the firewall

> > That might be a DNS-reverse-lookup problem. Leave it for a few > > minutes and see if it completes the connection. > >Hi Jonatan, will you please instruct me in details what should I do >and what may be the source of such DNS-reverse-lookup check which >failed, - VNC server, viewer or ssh

Re: ssh -R to hear ports outside the firewall

On Tue, 4 Dec 2001 23:28:48 + Jonathan Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > That might be a DNS-reverse-lookup problem. Leave it for a few > minutes and see if it completes the connection. > Hi Jonatan, will you please instruct me in details what should I do and what may be the source o

Re: ssh -R to hear ports outside the firewall

>Thank you, I tried now to connect at linux server from another port, but >with the same result. >The interesting thing is that while 'ssh -R' tunnel is established vnc >viewer does not return any messages, but when I close the tunnel it >immediatesy tell to the consol I started it from that VNC s

Re: ssh -R to hear ports outside the firewall

m that VNC server closed connection. Sergey. - Original Message - From: "SI Reasoning" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 4:28 PM Subject: Re: ssh -R to hear ports outside the firewall > if this is a linux machine try -R

Re: ssh -R to hear ports outside the firewall

if this is a linux machine try -R 5901:0.0.0.0:5900 the reason being that port 0 is always taken by Xwindows in linux. --- Sergey Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > I easily connect from inside the firewall the > machines outside the > firewall with com

ssh -R to hear ports outside the firewall

Hi all, I easily connect from inside the firewall the machines outside the firewall with command ssh -L 5900::5900 But if I try command ssh -R 5900:0.0.0.0:5900 or with the same result ssh -R 5900:localhost:5900 I established connection which is supposed to pass all

Re: test SSH over through firewall

x27;CTRL+]' Microsoft Telnet> open xyzzy 22 SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_2.9.9p2 I'd do this first on the same side of the firewall as the SSH server ... you could "

test SSH over through firewall

How can I test if our firewall will let through SSH? VNC protocol (RFB) seems to be restricted. (I only see the sync sent and no response) My options basically are to try to tunnel through a different protocol. I only know about SSH and Tunnel (which is very slow due to public server&#

Re: Firewall

YOu have to pass port 590x through to the VNC machines, 5900 for display 0, 5901 for display 1 ect. Dan Titus wrote: > I'm new to VNC. I like what I see. Here is my dilemma. > > I have a firewall with a DMZ port. My email server is connected to the DMZ. I > want to set up mul

Firewall

I'm new to VNC. I like what I see. Here is my dilemma. I have a firewall with a DMZ port. My email server is connected to the DMZ. I want to set up multiple VNC servers behind the firewall. When the employees connect from a remote site to the firewall, how do I get them to see the VNC se

Re: VNC through evil nasty firewall

As far as finding which tcp ports are accessable, I have seen two programs which might be of assistance: firewalk: http://www.packetfactory.net/firewalk/ and tcptraceroute: http://michael.toren.net/code/tcptraceroute/ I haven't actually tried either, the former is beyond what I neded, and the

Re: VNC through evil nasty firewall

>> Sysadmin or Login had an article last year about using ssh as a VPN >> by tunneling PPP though it which would give you full network >> connectivity. > >Do you have a link to this article? I'd love to read it. http://csociety.ecn.purdue.edu/~sigos/projects/ssh/forwarding/ http://sites.inka

Re: VNC through evil nasty firewall

> Sysadmin or Login had an article last year about using ssh as a VPN > by tunneling PPP though it which would give you full network > connectivity. Do you have a link to this article? I'd love to read it. --Robert - To unsub

VNC Server behind firewall not responding

I have a Squid proxy and firewall which allows me to connect to workstations (VNC servers) outside the firewall. When I try to connect to one inside, my traffic will reach the workstation (VNC server) but the outbound traffic will use a random port number (between 1200 and 1700 have been

Re: VNC through evil nasty firewall

Mark Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: ... > I've tried using HTTPort to > tunnel, and have also tried using Harmen van der Wal's VNC client (although > even this required learning more about Java than I knew before - now FA rather > than its square root) - I get as far as the password scree

VNC through evil nasty firewall - f/u1

MAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mark Peterson >Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 11:44 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: VNC through evil nasty firewall > > >I am behind a country wide firewall. No ICMP packets can get through and >even >port 119 is bl

RE: VNC through evil nasty firewall

he other side of the firewall. In the case of the mol biol databases, they won't be able to provide this functionality, in the case of my Dad, it's tough to set up his machine as the "server" remotely. I don't yet feel proficient enough to lay out money for a shell account to ex

Re: VNC through evil nasty firewall

work. You can use SSH on ports other than 22, if you have access to a machine capable of running the SSH deamon (SSHD) outside of the firewall (which are any Unix/Linux, Windows NT or 2000 using cygwin, www.cygwin.com) you can set it for any port and tunnel anything through it. Sysadmin or Login

RE: VNC through evil nasty firewall

mode that doesn't encrypt. -Original Message- From: Robert A. Book [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 1:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: VNC through evil nasty firewall Anyway, if port 22 is open, and if you can install an SSH client on your end and an SSH se

Re: VNC through evil nasty firewall

> I am behind a country wide firewall. No ICMP packets can get through and even > port 119 is blocked. Ports 20 ,21, 23, 25, 80 and 110 are open, but I'm not > sure about any others as any port scanner tells me all ports (even 80, 20 and > 21) are blocked, which is clearly n

VNC through evil nasty firewall

I am behind a country wide firewall. No ICMP packets can get through and even port 119 is blocked. Ports 20 ,21, 23, 25, 80 and 110 are open, but I'm not sure about any others as any port scanner tells me all ports (even 80, 20 and 21) are blocked, which is clearly not the case, so I

Windows 2000 as a service (behind a router/firewall)

Hey everyone I was wondering if anyone could help me with this problem. Here's my situation: I'm running windows 2000 on a PC that connects to the internet via a 3com Home Ethernet Gateway (router/firewall) and a cable modem. When I run VNC Server in App. mode, it

RE: VNC and Firewall problems

--- From: Chris Neil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 October 2001 10:13 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: VNC and Firewall problems I am having problems VNCing to a machine via our company's VPN. This goes through two firewalls both of which I believe are configured correctly.

VNC and Firewall problems

I am having problems VNCing to a machine via our company's VPN. This goes through two firewalls both of which I believe are configured correctly. We have been using this method of administration successfully for some time, but are unable to connect via VNC to the latest machine we have put there

RE: work(WINNT) <-> firewall(sockets allowed) <-> internet ,-> ho me(MACos9)

Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 5:28 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: work(WINNT) <-> firewall(sockets allowed) <-> internet ,-> ho me(MACos9) I do have a firewalll... and It is a real pain I hope this he

Java error from firewall.....please help

When I try to VNC into my home computer from work, I get this error when I go thru my IP redirect java.net.UnknownHostException:jrummer.myvnc.com when i go directly with my IP I get this error java.net.SocketException:connect Can anyone explain what this means and how to get around it so I can V

Problem with viewing a remote server via firewall

I've hit a problem with an NT4 server that has me baffled. I'm connecting via a firewall, with port 5900 open to use it. The session on the remote starts ok but the mouse response on screen freezes within seconds. Anyone got any thoughts? thanks Steve Brereton * * * * * * * * * * * *

RE: work(WINNT) <-> firewall(sockets allowed) <-> internet ,-> ho me(MACos9)

ECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: (bcc: Gerard Briscoe/RED/RESEARCH/PHILIPS) Subject: RE: work(WINNT) <-> firewall(sockets allowed) <-> internet ,-> ho me(MACos9) Classification: Please specify if you have a firewall. If you don't have one then you might be ab

Re: firewall issue

The machine that has the WinVNC server has the firewall. The macine running the viewer has no firewall. In addition, the WinVNC machine is running NT and the machine running the viewer is Windows 98. Jonathan Maton wrote: > > Might be more of a firewall issue than a VNC issue... I get a s

RE: work(WINNT) <-> firewall(sockets allowed) <-> internet ,-> ho me(MACos9)

Please specify if you have a firewall. If you don't have one then you might be able to do w/o "socks" unless MACos9 works differently then the Windows version. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 12:2

Re: firewall issue

Might be more of a firewall issue than a VNC issue... I get a similar behavior out of my SSH client when connecting to a remote SSH host; sporadically (but at least once a day) I get booted. Please clarify - which machine is behind the firewall: the machine running WinVNC server or the machine

firewall issue

I just installed ZoneLabs ZoneAlarm Firewall on a server that I reguarly connect to using WinVNC. However, since I have installed the firewall, VNC viewer (not the server) has been crashing quite a bit. I can connect and and do things and sporadically I will be disconnected or it will issue a VC

work(WINNT) <-> firewall(sockets allowed) <-> internet ,-> home(MACos9)

work(WINNT) <-> firewall(sockets allowed) <-> internet ,-> home(MACos9) This summarises my problem I have succeded in being to acces my home computer from work via using... chromiVNC on my mac at home... sockscap32 and vncviewer on a winnt box in the office.

Tray icon and Firewall conflict

This is my second posting - the first one never made it to the list. I have read problems with Tray Icon not shutting down. It has happened to me only with Win 98 when they have a software firewall installed - Zone Labs Zone Alarm. On the machines which do not have the fireewall they can shut

Tray Icon Freezes with Firewall

them I load an additional software firewall -Zone Labs Zone Alarm) when they have the ZoneLabs Zone Alarm firewall - they encounter an error trying to shut down the "tray Icon" and the "wait-end task-cancel" dialog box appears. I do log on again after a few seconds and the box is t

Running VNCServer on Linux firewall

I have VNC Server running on my Linux firewall and it appears to work the way I sort of want it to. I can use it so that I can jump from there to my internal machines on my network. however, I can not use it so far to view what is on the desktop that I would see if I turn on the monitor. I

VNC through a firewall.

I too am trying to run VNC through a firewall. Everything was fine connecting out to my server at my home computer and vice versa until we implemented a new firewall. I understand that there's some Java viewer out there that would let me communicate through the firewall by setting up some ki

VNC / Firewall

What is the simple way to get out when only a limited amount of ports are open. I know that you set the port # on the server side but how do you go about setting the port on the viewer side ? Maybe a silly question. I'm not familiar. thanks -Original Message- From: Alain LaBonti [mailt

Getting into firewall......

I can get out of my firewall to machine at home via SocksCap32... however I dont think I can get to my machine at work from home.. What do I need to do ?? Regards G - To unsubscribe, send a message with the line

Re: firewall SOCKS https

/RED/RESEARCH/PHILIPS) Subject: Re: firewall SOCKS https Classification: I have the latest version of ICQ for windows... and the different proxy settings that are available are as follows SOCKS4, SOCKS5 and HTTPS. only HTTPS actually works. This is partially what I am basing my

Re: firewall SOCKS https

ion. I am willing to have a go if u are... > > This is my understanding > work: VNCClient > firewall: NON-TRANSPARENT > home: VNCServer > > With a socks capable client or a program such as SocksCap32 I can opena socket >through the firewall. > However I then

Re: firewall SOCKS https

: VNCClient firewall: NON-TRANSPARENT home: VNCServer With a socks capable client or a program such as SocksCap32 I can opena socket through the firewall. However I then run into SOCK version issues, SOCKS4, SOCKS5, HTTPS The only program I have found with HTTPS socket support is ICQ, which

Re: firewall SOCKS https

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Unfortunately SocksCap32 only has support for Socks4 and Socks5 proxies, and I need >support for HTTPS proxies. Is there anything else I can try > This is very confusing. Your wrote: >However, I cannot get past the firewall, which has SOCK

Re: firewall SOCKS https

: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]@SMTP cc: Subject: Re: firewall SOCKS https Classification: For a SOCKS client that can Socksify apps, goto www.socks.nec.com and download SocksCap32. You then add applications to and launch them from SocksCap and they will go thru the SOCKS gateway just

Re: firewall SOCKS https

> > > > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 06/13/2001 12:16:01 PM >Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]@SMTP >Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]@SMTP >cc: >Subject:Re: firewall SOCKS https >Classification: > > >On Wednesday 13 J

RE: VNC and Firewall questions

AIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Brent Horowitz Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 12:06 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:VNC and Firewall questions I am running WinVNC and im trying to get through the firewall , we have a cisco pix firewall, port 80 is open. Im not sure wha

Re: vnc past past firewall and ip-masqing.

"Scott C. Best" wrote: > Shea: > > So...just to be sure: > > > > ipchains -I 1 input -s 0.0.0.0/0 -d $IP_EXT/32 5900 -p tcp -j ACCEPT > > > > I tried adding the commands right after the FTP section of the firewall > > script. Then I rest

Re: firewall SOCKS https

"Scott C. Best" wrote: > > Gerard: > Heya. I'd suggest not trying to work-around the > corporate firewall and SOCKS proxy, but rather to use them. That kind of use of a proxy could be excactly what a work-around the corporate firewall is! Of course it all

Re: firewall SOCKS https

Hi, Scott. If you primarily need SSH access over HTTP Proxy, I recommend you try Mindterm (http://www.mindbright.se/mindterm). Regards, Miro > Gerard: > Heya. I'd suggest not trying to work-around the > corporate firewall and SOCKS proxy, but rather to use them. > It&

Re: firewall SOCKS https

Gerard: Heya. I'd suggest not trying to work-around the corporate firewall and SOCKS proxy, but rather to use them. It's not optimal but...grab a copy of httptunnel, and setup one side at work, and another side at home: http://freshmeat.net/projects/httptunnel/

Re: firewall SOCKS https

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I would definately like to give it a try... > I suspect Mindterm provides a cleaner solution, so maybe you should try that first. But if you like, you can start by setting up http://www1.tip.nl/~t515027/brandgang/ and testing it with your (Socks) proxy. Then fe

Re: firewall SOCKS https

Jonathan Morton wrote: <...> > I would suggest talking to your network admin. If you can't make him > understand what SSH is and why it's a good thing, talk to his manager > about getting a new network admin. Of course, if he has good, logical > reasons why he doesn't want SSH going, that's up

Re: firewall SOCKS https

I would definately like to give it a try... Regards G [EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 06/14/2001 11:28:20 AM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]@SMTP Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]@SMTP cc: Subject:Re: firewall SOCKS https Classification

Re: firewall SOCKS https

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: <...> > >Mindterm is a Java SSH client which supports HTTP proxy, perhaps your firewall > >would allow > >using Mindterm. See http://www.mindbright.se/mindterm The OP is using Socks, but that is also supported by Mindterm. > >I am goig

Re: firewall SOCKS https

On Thursday, June 14, 2001, at 09:58 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > If there is a possibility to run SSHD on your Mac, > yes, what is SSHD exactly. (I know SSH is the protocol) SSHD stands for SSH Daemon, and means a program designed to accept SSH connections. This is in contrast to an S

Re: firewall SOCKS https

Most people here do not even know what ssh is... !!! G - To unsubscribe, send a message with the line: unsubscribe vnc-list to [EMAIL PROTECTED] See also: http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/intouch.html --

Re: firewall SOCKS https

supports HTTP proxy, perhaps your firewall would allow using Mindterm. See http://www.mindbright.se/mindterm I am goign to try it Thanks G - To unsubscribe, send a message with the line: unsubscribe vnc-list to [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: firewall SOCKS https

> This place is crazy... why we cant have a transparent firewall I dont know > but every protocol except HTTP and FTP are blocked. the sad thing is everyone > else here seems oblivious to the fact that other things exists. Its like > living in pre-internet > state or somethi

Re: firewall SOCKS https

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > This place is crazy... why we cant have a transparent firewall I dont know Maybe they had good reasons to support only certain applications. Think about it. > but every protocol except HTTP and FTP are blocked. Protocol or port? Socks doesn't re

Re: firewall SOCKS https

This place is crazy... why we cant have a transparent firewall I dont know but every protocol except HTTP and FTP are blocked. the sad thing is everyone else here seems oblivious to the fact that other things exists. Its like living in pre-internet state or something... I am determined to

VNC and Firewall questions

I am running WinVNC and im trying to get through the firewall , we have a cisco pix firewall, port 80 is open. Im not sure what i should set the viewer to connect to and what i should set WINVNC as. Should i set WinVNC to display # 80 or should and try to connect at 5820 or is it -5820. I was

Re: vnc past past firewall and ip-masqing.

Shea: Heya. Good progress. :) Some thoughts: > I have vnc running successfully. I start the vncserver on box B, and > then can log in w/ xvncviewer on B as well. I logged into my > Firewall/Masq box and entered the last two commands. I tried to vnc > to my ip C, today at

Re: firewall SOCKS https

S htpps support . Yes, you need a socksified viewer, and a server (or redirector) that listens on port 443. It has been discussed several times on this list how to achieve the latter. However, it has also been suggested that you should take the *intended* effect of your firewall into consid

  1   2   >