juan wrote:
Edward Murphy via agora-discussion [2025-02-17 21:10]:
RadicalRose wrote:
I activate myself. I push the boulder.
[…]
This may have been ineffective in re-registering you (see CFJ 4100). I
recommend announcing "I register", just in case.
But RadicalRose wasn't deregistered. On
---
> 9214~ Mischief1.0 Stone Badgers
I vote PRESENT
On Tue, 18 Feb 2025, 21:01 Katherina Walshe-Grey via agora-business, <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 2025-02-17 at 19:38 -0600, secre
Edward Murphy via agora-discussion [2025-02-17 21:10]:
> RadicalRose wrote:
>
> > I activate myself. I push the boulder.
> >
> […]
>
> This may have been ineffective in re-registering you (see CFJ 4100). I
> recommend announcing "I register", just in case.
But RadicalRose wasn't deregistered. O
RadicalRose wrote:
I activate myself. I push the boulder.
--
RadicalRose
Hat: knitted cap
This may have been ineffective in re-registering you (see CFJ 4100). I
recommend announcing "I register", just in case.
--
[ANSC H:GE V:G B:0]
On 2/17/25 5:43 PM, Matt Smyth via agora-business wrote:
Does this mean my lily stamp is rare, now? Or is that not how it works xp
Three things going on here...
1) players can be active or inactive. The difference is mainly that inactive
players can be deregistered after 60 days (without 3
Does this mean my lily stamp is rare, now? Or is that not how it works xp
--
juniper
On Tue, 18 Feb 2025, 08:45 secretsnail9 via agora-business, <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 7:26 PM secretsnail9 via agora-business <
> agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> >
I push the boulder whilst sleepwalking
——
Ben
From: agora-business on behalf of Kiako
via agora-business
Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2025 9:52:40 PM
To: agora-busin...@agoranomic.org
Cc: Kiako
Subject: BUS: (@Absurdor) Slippery Slopes
I push the boulder.
--
On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 11:59 AM Janet Cobb via agora-business
wrote:
> On 2/13/25 14:47, Gaelan Steele via agora-business wrote:
> >> On Feb 13, 2025, at 7:40 PM, Katherina Walshe-Grey via agora-business
> >> wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2025-02-13 at 19:38 +, Gaelan Steele via agora-business
> >> w
On Fri, 2025-02-07 at 19:25 -0600, secretsnail9 via agora-business wrote:
> This is a call to action instead of inaction. I think it might be time for
> a revival of sorts, given the lack of gameplay right now, and a recent
> burst of interest. I will be in support of any proposals that add gamepla
Mischief via agora-discussion [2025-02-07 18:44]:
> On 2/6/25 8:20 AM, juan via agora-discussion wrote:
>
> > That's why I created a civic duty rewarding scheme for deactivations
> > that no one seemed to notice.
>
> For those of us drawing a blank here, could you remind us?
I created a contract
On Sun, 2025-02-09 at 20:58 +0800, Finley W. via agora-discussion
wrote:
> I object to my deactivation and push the boulder. (Salute)
You sent that to agora-discussion; it won't do anything unless you send
it to agora-business.
--
ais523
I object to my deactivation and push the boulder. (Salute)
On Sat, Feb 8, 2025, 9:26 AM secretsnail9 via agora-business, <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> This is a call to action instead of inaction. I think it might be time for
> a revival of sorts, given the lack of gameplay right now,
I believe I have pushed the boulder as well as claimed the Veblen.
Also I own the Veblen and it has infinite points and is thus no longer
pointless.
——
Ben
From: agora-business on behalf of
secretsnail9 via agora-business
Sent: Friday, February 7, 2025 8:25:50
On 2/6/25 8:20 AM, juan via agora-discussion wrote:
That's why I created a civic duty rewarding scheme for deactivations
that no one seemed to notice.
For those of us drawing a blank here, could you remind us?
--
Mischief
Collector, Illuminator, Prime Minister
Hat: steampunk hat
Vitality: gho
On Fri, 2025-02-07 at 11:08 -0800, 4st nomic via agora-business wrote:
> I vote FOR on 9211
> I vote FOR on 9212
> I vote FOR on 9213
> I vote FOR on 9214
Despite the thread subject, I don't think 9214 was actually
distributed?
--
ais523
Matt Smyth via agora-business [2025-02-06 07:03]:
> […] noting that I'm somehow still active after a few months of
> inactivity.
As a fan of automation for boring tasks, I avoid doing things I don't
MUST if they cannot be automated.
That's why I created a civic duty rewarding scheme for deactivat
On 2/5/25 12:53, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Wed, 2025-02-05 at 17:44 +, Katherina Walshe-Grey via agora-
> business wrote:
>> On Wed, 2025-02-05 at 02:16 -0600, secretsnail9 via agora-official
>> wrote:
>>> 9211~ qenya, Mischief 1.7 De-Convoluting Mooting v1.1
>>> 9212*
On Wed, 2025-02-05 at 17:44 +, Katherina Walshe-Grey via agora-
business wrote:
> On Wed, 2025-02-05 at 02:16 -0600, secretsnail9 via agora-official
> wrote:
> > 9211~ qenya, Mischief 1.7 De-Convoluting Mooting v1.1
> > 9212* Mischief 3.0 Incentives
> > 9213~ Mu
Mischief via agora-discussion [2025-01-31 21:13]:
> On 1/31/25 9:10 PM, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> > Ah, oops.
> >
> > However, only 7 should have failed since I was transferred 4 spendies for
> > that CFJ whose number I can't look up right now.
>
> -sigh- This is why we need a Spe
On 1/31/25 9:10 PM, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
Ah, oops.
However, only 7 should have failed since I was transferred 4 spendies for that
CFJ whose number I can't look up right now.
-sigh- This is why we need a Spendor.
--
Mischief
Collector, Illuminator, Prime Minister
Hat: steamp
Ah, oops.
However, only 7 should have failed since I was transferred 4 spendies for that
CFJ whose number I can't look up right now.
On 1/31/25 6:10 PM, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote:
Ten times, I pay a fee of two spendies to gain one radiance.
Janet Cobb
Nine of these failed
https://www.mail-archive.com/agora-business@agoranomic.org/msg47444.html
--
Mischief
Collector, Illuminator, Prime Minister
Hat: steampunk hat
Well I push it towards
——
Ben
From: agora-business on behalf of Owen
C via agora-business
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2025 11:12:28 PM
To: agora-busin...@agoranomic.org
Cc: Owen C
Subject: BUS: Boulder!
I push it backwards.
On 1/17/25 1:47 PM, ais523 via agora-business wrote:
(Note: the CFJ appears earlier in this message than
these arguments do, so the judge should probably evaluate the CFJ as
though the argument are not publicly known, although I'm interested in
whether the mere fact of me posting these arguments
I push the boulder
I object to each intent to declare apathy
——
Ben
From: agora-business on behalf of
secretsnail9 via agora-business
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2025 8:29:04 PM
To: agora-busin...@agoranomic.org
Cc: secretsnail9
Subject: BUS: (@absurdor) boulder
On Sat, 2025-01-11 at 13:15 -0500, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> When we've considered this before (e.g. for coins, before boatloads were
> invented), people had written a bunch of contracts that would not handle
> assets being destroyed out from under them (their internal state
> wouldn
On 1/11/25 13:41, Mischief via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 1/11/25 1:15 PM, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
>
>> When we've considered this before (e.g. for coins, before boatloads were
>> invented), people had written a bunch of contracts that would not handle
>> assets being destroyed out
On 1/11/25 1:15 PM, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
When we've considered this before (e.g. for coins, before boatloads were
invented), people had written a bunch of contracts that would not handle
assets being destroyed out from under them (their internal state
wouldn't match their actua
On 1/11/25 13:13, Mischief via agora-discussion wrote:
>> AGAINST. This will make it far more difficult to implement taxation if
>> we ever decide that's something we're interested in.
> Why? We already can't use wording like "every player who owns X" for a
> potential taxation rule since the L&F
On 1/11/25 12:50 PM, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote:
9206~ Mischief1.0 Let Contracts Own Stamps
AGAINST. This will make it far more difficult to implement taxation if
we ever decide that's something we're interested in.
Why? We already can't use wording like "every
On 1/11/25 13:08, Mischief via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 1/11/25 12:48 PM, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
>
>> Hmm. I think I'd argue that, regardless, people who are doing that are
>> not truly subscribed to the forum. For instance, if mail-archive went
>> down but the lists themselves
On 1/11/25 12:48 PM, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
Hmm. I think I'd argue that, regardless, people who are doing that are
not truly subscribed to the forum. For instance, if mail-archive went
down but the lists themselves stayed up, I don't think we'd accept that
the lists have ceased t
On 1/11/25 12:46, Katherina Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Sat, 2025-01-11 at 12:44 -0500, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>> On 1/11/25 12:42, Katherina Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2025-01-10 at 00:47 +, ais523 via agora-business wrote:
Gratu
On Sat, 2025-01-11 at 12:44 -0500, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion
wrote:
> On 1/11/25 12:42, Katherina Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion wrote:
> > On Fri, 2025-01-10 at 00:47 +, ais523 via agora-business wrote:
> > > Gratuitous: I received a copy of this message with only four ">"
> > > charac
On 1/11/25 12:42, Katherina Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Fri, 2025-01-10 at 00:47 +, ais523 via agora-business wrote:
>> Gratuitous: I received a copy of this message with only four ">"
>> characters (the relevant portion is quoted above), so it is at least
>> possible for me to
On Fri, 2025-01-10 at 00:47 +, ais523 via agora-business wrote:
> Gratuitous: I received a copy of this message with only four ">"
> characters (the relevant portion is quoted above), so it is at least
> possible for me to tell that the original had a line starting with
> "From ". There are ind
On 1/10/25 12:33, 4st nomic via agora-discussion wrote:
> Gratuitous: i see 6 >. And no one can prove otherwise. Therefore, take this
> as an argument for IRRELEVANT: the transfer is specifying an ambiguous
> number of spendies, and is therefor invalid.
Is that a true statement? You haven't sent
Gratuitous: i see 6 >. And no one can prove otherwise. Therefore, take this
as an argument for IRRELEVANT: the transfer is specifying an ambiguous
number of spendies, and is therefor invalid.
--
4st
putting jesters cap back on, it fell off while mobile
On Thu, Jan 9, 2025, 4:37 PM Katherina Wals
On 1/8/25 11:14 AM, 4st nomic via agora-business wrote:
In case this comes back...
- Whenever a player wins the game, grant each Angel player 2 gnomes.
"Whenever one or more players win the game..."
Otherwise, a single group win can give every Angel player the ability to
win at will (and th
Understood, thanks.
On Wed, Jan 8, 2025, 12:48 PM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 1/8/25 15:44, Owen C via agora-business wrote:
> > I vote FOR both proposals here.
>
>
> You can't vote on these yet; they have to be "distributed" by the
> Promotor fi
On 1/8/25 15:44, Owen C via agora-business wrote:
> I vote FOR both proposals here.
You can't vote on these yet; they have to be "distributed" by the
Promotor first. See [0] for an example.
[0]
https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-official/2024-December/018190.html
--
J
On 1/8/25 11:14, 4st nomic via agora-business wrote:
> I am generally proposing an informal classification of rules, one that is
> clearly marked "DANGER", so that players may be aware that playing that
> subgame may come at a cost. With no risk, there is no reward.
>
> I submit the following propo
On Wed, 2025-01-08 at 08:14 -0800, 4st nomic via agora-business wrote:
> - Once per player per week by announcement, a feral goblin can be
> transferred to anything so long as that goblin becomes loyal by doing so.
> - Once per player per week by announcement, a goblin owned by the Lost and
> Found
On 1/8/25 1:39 AM, 4st nomic via agora-business wrote:
Infractions of this rule are class 4. The referee is ENCOURAGED to specify
the maximum number of blots for infractions related to goblins.
How does one violate this rule? An incorrect Goblin Rebellion
announcement just doesn't do anything
I have no relation to them whatsoever.
On Sun, Jan 5, 2025, 12:54 PM Edward Murphy via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> Automaticat wrote:
>
> > I register as Automaticat, give myself a welcome package, and push the
> > boulder.
>
> Welcome!
>
> Are you the player prev
Automaticat wrote:
I register as Automaticat, give myself a welcome package, and push the
boulder.
Welcome!
Are you the player previously nicknamed "o" (registered from 2016-2018
and 2019-2020), or is their e-mail address just somewhat similar?
--
[ANSC H:GE V:G B:0]
I’ll just push the boulder normally.
The previous sentence is a game action intended to push the boulder
——
Ben
From: agora-business on behalf of 4st
nomic via agora-business
Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2024 3:15:08 PM
To: Agora Business
Cc: 4st nomic <4st.no..
ais523 wrote:
On Sat, 2024-12-28 at 21:01 -0800, Edward Murphy via agora-discussion wrote:
ais523 wrote:
So the message itself is sufficient indication of the person's
intentions, as far as I can tell. I don't think it's reasonable to
assume that someone might have intentionally tried to award
ais523 wrote:
On Sat, 2024-12-28 at 21:01 -0800, Edward Murphy via agora-discussion wrote:
ais523 wrote:
(It is also worth noting that "an experienced player aiming for some
level of ambiguity" would also cause a registration: unambiguously
intending to ambiguously register still demonstrates
On Sat, 2024-12-28 at 21:01 -0800, Edward Murphy via agora-discussion wrote:
> ais523 wrote:
> > (It is also worth noting that "an experienced player aiming for some
> > level of ambiguity" would also cause a registration: unambiguously
> > intending to ambiguously register still demonstrates a des
On Sat, 2024-12-28 at 21:01 -0800, Edward Murphy via agora-discussion wrote:
> ais523 wrote:
> > So the message itself is sufficient indication of the person's
> > intentions, as far as I can tell. I don't think it's reasonable to
> > assume that someone might have intentionally tried to award emse
ais523 wrote:
On Sat, 2024-12-28 at 11:46 -0800, Edward Murphy via agora-discussion wrote:
ais523 wrote:
On Fri, 2024-12-27 at 20:35 -0800, Edward Murphy via agora-business
wrote:
In the absence of such evidence, I find that the precedent from CFJ 3776
still holds. Merely attempting an actio
On Sat, 2024-12-28 at 11:46 -0800, Edward Murphy via agora-discussion wrote:
> ais523 wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2024-12-27 at 20:35 -0800, Edward Murphy via agora-business
> > wrote:
> > > In the absence of such evidence, I find that the precedent from CFJ 3776
> > > still holds. Merely attempting an a
ais523 wrote:
On Fri, 2024-12-27 at 20:35 -0800, Edward Murphy via agora-business
wrote:
In the absence of such evidence, I find that the precedent from CFJ 3776
still holds. Merely attempting an action limited to players is not
reasonably unambiguous evidence of intent to register; it is reaso
On Fri, 2024-12-27 at 20:35 -0800, Edward Murphy via agora-business
wrote:
> In the absence of such evidence, I find that the precedent from CFJ 3776
> still holds. Merely attempting an action limited to players is not
> reasonably unambiguous evidence of intent to register; it is reasonably
> like
On Fri, 2024-12-27 at 20:02 -0500, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> I object to each intent to declare apathy.
>
> [qenya mentioned tabled actions, so, you know, just to be safe.]
I was only trying to remember when my regulation amendment intent would
become mature! My reputation is being s
On Fri, 2024-12-20 at 21:00 -0500, Mischief via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 12/20/24 8:49 PM, ais523 via agora-business wrote:
>
> > > 9199~ Mischief 1.0 Rare Stamps, Differently
>
> > AGAINST, breakable by new players joining
>
> Could you explain this a bit more? The proble
On 12/20/24 8:49 PM, ais523 via agora-business wrote:
9199~ Mischief 1.0 Rare Stamps, Differently
AGAINST, breakable by new players joining
Could you explain this a bit more? The problem isn't obvious to me.
Yes, a welcome package usually creates a rare stamp, but it's i
On 12/16/24 21:03, Mischief via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 12/16/24 5:48 PM, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
>
>> None of those options in Rule 2201 are defining *new* actions, whereas
>> this clause is. "Denying" the claim has its natural language meaning,
>> "publish" is well-defined, an
On 12/16/24 5:48 PM, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
None of those options in Rule 2201 are defining *new* actions, whereas
this clause is. "Denying" the claim has its natural language meaning,
"publish" is well-defined, and "initiate an inquiry case" is
well-defined (except for "inquiry
On Mon, 2024-12-16 at 17:50 -0500, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> ["inquiry case" is a historical term used throughout the rules; defining
> it here removes any ambiguity and helps answer a question that has been
> asked multiple times by newer places. Also, standardize casing to match
> mo
On 12/16/24 17:46, Mischief via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 12/16/24 5:06 PM, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote:
>
>> On 12/15/24 16:45, secretsnail9 via agora-official wrote:
>>> 9197~ Mischief, ais523, Kate 1.5 The Game is Afoot
>> PRESENT. "by an announcement" isn't defined; it should be
On 12/16/24 5:06 PM, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote:
On 12/15/24 16:45, secretsnail9 via agora-official wrote:
9197~ Mischief, ais523, Kate 1.5 The Game is Afoot
PRESENT. "by an announcement" isn't defined; it should be "by
announcement, clearly identifying [...]".
Rule 2201 uses
On 12/14/24 7:01 PM, Brian Blomlie via agora-business wrote:
Also, in case I was not a player last time I attempted to grant myself a
welcome package, I grant myself a welcome package now.
If your attempt to do so failed, then ais523's shortly after succeeded
(CFJ 4100 will indirectly determ
Should've been to the business email. Jinkies.
In case the previous moves were not registered/legitimate:
I push the boulder.
I put on a jester's hat as an additional flourish. Announcing this is
doubly important to me.
On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 1:18 PM Finley W. wrote:
> I ought to be more econo
I ought to be more economical with my correspondence.
I would like to add:
I push the boulder.
I put on a jester's hat as an additional flourish. Announcing this is
important to me.
On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 12:46 PM Finley W. via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I spend 18
On Sun, Dec 15, 2024 at 4:48 PM Edward Murphy via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> juan wrote:
>
> > Edward Murphy via agora-discussion [2024-12-08 09:09]:
> >> Specifically, many reports self-ratify (Rule 2201) if they go
> >> unchallenged for a week. A CoE blocks this
juan wrote:
Edward Murphy via agora-discussion [2024-12-08 09:09]:
Specifically, many reports self-ratify (Rule 2201) if they go
unchallenged for a week. A CoE blocks this (though if it's denied, then
a new one-week countdown begins), while a CFJ blocks it indefinitely.
Of course an officer ca
Edward Murphy via agora-discussion [2024-12-08 09:09]:
> Specifically, many reports self-ratify (Rule 2201) if they go
> unchallenged for a week. A CoE blocks this (though if it's denied, then
> a new one-week countdown begins), while a CFJ blocks it indefinitely.
>
> Of course an officer can resp
I also push said boulder.
(I think my wording would make it fail if Murphy pushed the wrong boulder)
——
Ben
From: agora-business on behalf of
Edward Murphy via agora-business
Sent: Sunday, December 8, 2024 12:23:01 PM
To: Agora Business
Cc: Edward Murphy
Subje
Janet wrote:
On 12/2/24 09:21, juan via agora-official wrote:
Selected commits
dad9620 Remove ■'s deadname from record
This will be reflected in the next monthly report. I only publicize
this because I want to make it clear that other players may request
similar th
juan wrote:
RadicalRose via agora-business [2024-11-30 11:14]:
I push the boulder (also I pushed the boulder in my registration message and
I'm not sure this was picked up on).
Thank you for reminding me! Sorry for missing it. And by the way, the usual way
of dealing with these things is ca
Thank you for correcting me. I've kind of forgotten how to play.
On Sun, Dec 8, 2024, 7:34 PM ais523 via agora-discussion, <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 2024-12-08 at 19:30 +0800, Finley W. via agora-discussion
> wrote:
> > OK. I become active. Then, if possible, I push the
OK. I become active. Then, if possible, I push the boulder.
On Sun, Dec 8, 2024, 7:17 PM ais523 via agora-discussion, <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 2024-12-08 at 12:58 +0800, Finley W. via agora-business wrote:
> > I would like to reactivate my status as a player if I have n
On Sun, 2024-12-08 at 19:30 +0800, Finley W. via agora-discussion
wrote:
> OK. I become active. Then, if possible, I push the boulder.
You posted that message to agora-discussion by mistake. It needs to be
posted to a public forum to be successful (usually agora-business).
--
ais523
On Sun, 2024-12-08 at 12:58 +0800, Finley W. via agora-business wrote:
> I would like to reactivate my status as a player if I have not
> already done so before. Are there other things I should do?
At the moment, that message is stating your desires but it isn't
actually performing an action; you
On Tue, 2024-12-03 at 01:58 +, ais523 via agora-business wrote:
> Using the mechanism in rule 2569, I win the game by paying a fee of:
> * 1 4st stamp,
> * 1 ais523 stamp,
> * 1 blob stamp,
> * 1 Immae stamp,
> * 1 Jackrabbit stamp,
> * 1 Janet stamp,
> * 1 juan stamp,
> * 1 Kate stamp,
> * 1 K
(This idea started on Discord by a non player and I stole it. Base on do
and the agoran traditional -or suffix)
--
4st
putting jesters cap back on, it fell off while mobile
On Mon, Dec 2, 2024, 4:55 AM juan via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> 4st nomic via agora-busi
4st nomic via agora-business [2024-12-01 22:48]:
> I submit the following proposal:
> {Replace all instances of "Absurdor" with "Door".}
You know, as a curiosity, in Portuguese this is equivalent to calling
me dumb.
--
juan
Mischief via agora-business [2024-11-30 11:03]:
> I transfer my last two spendies to juan. (If that fails, I twice transfer
> one spendie to juan.)
Thank you!
--
juan
Thanks for mentioning tournaments!
#BringBackTheYellowRibbon!
--
4st
putting jesters cap back on, it fell off while mobile
On Sun, Dec 1, 2024, 2:20 PM Trigon via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 12/1/24 2:45 PM, Mischief via agora-business wrote:
> >
> > I submit the
On 12/1/24 5:19 PM, Trigon via agora-business wrote:
This would be almost entirely redundant because tournaments exist (and
are criminally underused IMO). The differences are just that tournaments
use regulations instead of contracts and that they award wins directly
instead of by way of victo
On 11/30/24 2:00 PM, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote:
I pay a fee of 5 spendies to transfer 1 nix stamp from the L&FD to myself.
I pay a fee of 6 spendies to transfer 1 R. Lee stamp from the L&FD to
myself.
I pay a fee of 7 spendies to transfer 1 Mercury stamp from the L&FD to
myself.
Th
On 11/25/24 6:15 PM, Katherina Walshe-Grey via agora-business wrote:
On Mon, 2024-11-25 at 15:06 -0800, 4st nomic via agora-business wrote:
I vote FOR on 9195.
The previous sentence is a fingerprint.
I note that 4st violated Rule 2471 in this message by claiming that the
sentence "I vote FOR o
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 25, 2024, at 18:16, Katherina Walshe-Grey via agora-business
> wrote:
>
> This clearly does not describe the
> sentence in question, which is a perfectly ordinary sentence that anyone
> might reasonably create by attempting to convey its meaning, without
> knowled
On Mon, 2024-11-25 at 16:09 -0500, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> I vote as follows:
> > 9195~ Mischief, Kate, Janet 1.0 Commitment Issues
>
> AGAINST. There is never any check that the purported kind of document
> matches reality.
Isn't that the very next sentence? "If the statemen
On November 22, 2024 7:57:14 AM MST, Katherina Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion
wrote:
>On Fri, 2024-11-22 at 10:56 -0300, juan via agora-discussion wrote:
>> Mischief via agora-business [2024-11-22 06:52]:
>> > On 11/21/24 10:26 AM, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote:
>> >
>> > > I object to e
On Fri, 2024-11-22 at 10:56 -0300, juan via agora-discussion wrote:
> Mischief via agora-business [2024-11-22 06:52]:
> > On 11/21/24 10:26 AM, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> >
> > > I object to each intent to deregister a player. (For the reasons that
> > > qenya points out.)
> >
> > I a
Mischief via agora-business [2024-11-22 06:52]:
> On 11/21/24 10:26 AM, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote:
>
> > I object to each intent to deregister a player. (For the reasons that
> > qenya points out.)
>
> I also object to each intent to deregister a player.
>
> I'm trying to avoid any unc
On Sat, Nov 16, 2024, at 2:04 PM, Paul McDowell via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 16, 2024 at 1:36 PM RadicalRose via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> > I may be wrong, but I interpret R1728 not as limiting the use of the word
> > "intend" to tabled actions,
On 11/16/24 12:14 PM, RadicalRose via agora-business wrote:
I intend to pay 5 Spendies to grant myself 2 RadicalRose stamps.
Based on the back and forth discussion and rule 2579's text (requiring
that fee-based action announcements "indicate intent to pay that fee for
the sole purpose of usi
On Sat, Nov 16, 2024 at 1:36 PM RadicalRose via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I may be wrong, but I interpret R1728 not as limiting the use of the word
> "intend" to tabled actions, and my usage of "intend" in the quoted above
> message achieves both "setting forth i
On Sat, Nov 16, 2024, at 12:59 PM, Kiako via agora-business wrote:
> On 11/16/24 11:14 AM, RadicalRose via agora-business wrote:
>
> > I register for Agora. My name is RadicalRose.
> >
> > I award myself a Welcome Package.
> Welcome!
>
> > I intend to pay 5 Spendies to grant myself 2 RadicalRos
Oooh my weekly task
I push the boulder (violently)
——
Ben
From: agora-business on behalf of
Edward Murphy via agora-business
Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2024 2:55:40 PM
To: Agora Business
Cc: Edward Murphy
Subject: BUS: This is still a thing (attn Absurdor)
I
As do I
On Thu, Nov 7, 2024 at 8:15 PM juan via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> Paul McDowell via agora-business [2024-11-07 13:23]:
> > On Thu, Nov 7, 2024 at 12:57 PM Janet Cobb via agora-business <
> > agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> >
> > > I object to eac
Paul McDowell via agora-business [2024-11-07 13:23]:
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2024 at 12:57 PM Janet Cobb via agora-business <
> agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> > I object to each intent to Declare Apathy.
> >
>
> As do I
I don't.
--
juan
Janet wrote:
I intend, without objection, to clean Rule 591 (Delivering
Judgements) by replacing "irresolvable" with "unresolvable".
I don't object to this one, but I'm not sure I see the point?
"irresolvable" seems fine and exists in several dictionaries.
I don't have a strong opinion on th
On 11/3/24 17:10, Mischief via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 11/3/24 4:50 PM, Edward Murphy via agora-business wrote:
>
>> I intend, without objection, to clean Rule 2695 (The Veblen) by
>> replacing "Abusrdor," with "Absurdor,".
> P9172 should have already fixed this
>
> https://www.mail-archive.co
On 11/3/24 4:50 PM, Edward Murphy via agora-business wrote:
I intend, without objection, to clean Rule 2695 (The Veblen) by
replacing "Abusrdor," with "Absurdor,".
P9172 should have already fixed this
https://www.mail-archive.com/agora-official@agoranomic.org/msg14130.html
--
Mischief
Collec
On 10/31/24 6:03 PM, ais523 via agora-business wrote:
Ten times, I perform the action "I increase my radiance by 1 by paying
a fee of 2 Spendies". If I have remembered my current Spendie balance
correctly, only the first seven of these work, with the remainder
failing due to inability to pay the
1 - 100 of 3026 matches
Mail list logo
