On Fri, 2024-12-27 at 20:35 -0800, Edward Murphy via agora-business wrote: > In the absence of such evidence, I find that the precedent from CFJ 3776 > still holds. Merely attempting an action limited to players is not > reasonably unambiguous evidence of intent to register; it is reasonably > likely that a new player simply misread the rules and/or mixed up the > order of eir intended actions, or that an experienced player was aiming > for some level of ambiguity (reasonable or otherwise).
Part of this paragraph doesn't seem to match the judgement: if a new player mixed up the order of eir actions, that *would* indicate an intent to register, as one of the actions would be a registration. -- ais523
