On Sat, 2024-12-28 at 21:01 -0800, Edward Murphy via agora-discussion wrote: > ais523 wrote: > > (It is also worth noting that "an experienced player aiming for some > > level of ambiguity" would also cause a registration: unambiguously > > intending to ambiguously register still demonstrates a desire to become > > a player. IIRC there was a past CFJ on the subject, although I didn't > > manage to find it.) > > Not necessarily, it may simply demonstrate a desire to /possibly/ become > a player at that time, especially if pro-actively followed by something > like "I register" (to see which way the judge leans, but minimize the > reporting burden on the Registrar and other officers).
I've now found the precedent: CFJ 2980 <https://agoranomic.org/cases/?2980>, which references CFJ 2972 <https://agoranomic.org/cases/?2972>. Contradicting this precedent may have major consequences for the gamestate, given that it would probably mean that some players who everyone thought were registered weren't actually registered, meaning that their actions weren't actually performed, and self-ratification has been broken at many points in Agora's history. -- ais523
